A Final Palin Post

I’m back from the Last Frontier with this week’s dead tree cover story on Sarah Palin, written with the very excellent editor-at-large David Von Drehle. I don’t think this will be the last we hear from the soon-to-be-former governor. To me, one of the most interesting aspects of the story is how vehemently the Palin camp blames Barack Obama.

From the story:

For Palin, however, these aren’t isolated incidents. She believes they grow from the same root, which is too big and too formidable to ignore. “A lot of this comes from Washington, D.C. The trail is pretty direct and pretty obvious to us,” says Meg Stapleton, a close Palin adviser in Alaska. Awaiting a flight back to Anchorage from distant Dillingham, Stapleton adds that the anti-Palin offensive seems lifted straight from The Thumpin’, which describes the political strategies of Rahm Emanuel, who is now the White House chief of staff. “It’s the Sarah Palin playbook. It’s how they operate,” Stapleton says.

Palin and her Alaska circle find evidence for their suspicions about the White House in the person of Pete Rouse, who lived in Juneau for a time before he became chief of staff to a young U.S. Senator named Barack Obama. Rouse, they note, is a friend of former Alaska state senator Kim Elton, who pushed the first ethics investigation of Palin, examining her controversial firing of the state’s public-safety commissioner. Both Rouse and Elton have joined the Obama Administration. White House press secretary Robert Gibbs scoffed at the theory. “The charge is ridiculous,” he said. “Obviously there is no effort … From my vantage point, a lot of the criticism she is getting from others seems to be generated from self-inflicted wounds.

Meg went a step further at one point telling me, “I just hope to God Rahm Emanuel isn’t using taxpayer money to come after Alaska.” That’s the way they think about it: that these Alaskans filing ethics complaints have been hoodwinked by Obama operatives into wasting the Alaskan government’s time and resources. They believe that with Palin gone, the state will no longer face this barrage of “frivolous” compliants. On that point, they are probably right — there will be much less interest in filing complaints against Lt. Gov. Sean Parnell. Palin, Meg said, was their target all along because she “represents the biggest threat to Obama. She’s the only one who can get the base excited.” I’m not entirely convinced of Obama’s Nixon-esque sabotage capabilities, but I do think Palin has felt under attack for the last eight months and it wasn’t a hard leap for anyone in her orbit to connect local progressive wingnuts and the Administration. Palin has never been great at playing defense.

But “the barracuda” enjoys the offense and I think that’s part of what we’ll see from her going forward: an offensive against the Obama Administration. Obama is probably not shaking in his boots just yet, but a U.S.A. Today/Gallup poll showed that Palin’s surprise resignation has actually given her a bump amongst G.O.P. voters. She lost ground, though, with Dems and Independents, voters critical to winning the White House. On the other hand, moderates a general election target group. Right now, the only people Palin needs to please ahead of a potential 2012 run are Republican primary voters.

Subscribe to Jay Newton-Small on Facebook
Related Topics: 2012, obama, Sarah Palin, Barack Obama, Sarah Palin, Uncategorized, White House
  • Latest on Swampland

    Morning Must Reads: Secret

    Obama Administration Blocks Global Health Fund To Fight Disease In Developing NationsHuffPost Politics

    SAUL LOEB / AFP / Getty Images

    A Tale of Two Economies: Mitt Romney vs. Republican Governors

    The great recession has left the state of Ohio battered and bruised–and Mitt Romney would have you believe it’s Barack Obama’s fault. Writing in the Cleveland Plain-Dealer on May 4, Romney advised Ohioans that the President has delivered them “paltry results,” and that their state is in need of “a fundamental change in direction.”

  • mrtoads

    “To me, one of the most interesting aspects of the story is how vehemently the Palin camp blames Barack Obama.”
    Interesting? That’s the norm in the insane world of the far right these days – blame him for anything and everything. You don’t specify what the Palinauts blame him for, but then you don’t really need to.
    In Palin’s case, that’s the norm too, but it applies to her life – it’s always somebody else’s fault.
    Look; I know you guys are fixated on this silly, dangerous woman, but can we just drop her? I mean, you’re so busy explaining how she thinks the liberals and the press and Barack Obama are trying to destroy the country in general and her in particular that you’ve even stopped going after your favorite targets, the Clintons. I bet they feel lonely and abandoned.

  • kbanginmotown

    JNS: After the pile-on over your SP interview the other day, one would think it might be prudent to down play another Palinoscopy.


    David Corn (link)
    posits that this is a blatant ploy by TIME to sell magazines (as if 2 weeks’ worth of MJ 24/7 were not enough!).

    If you’re going to be “not entirely convinced” about the WH’s non-involvement with this story, why not try for the double-reverse: Rahm, by turning Palin into a martyr, boosts her chances of defeating Romney in the GOP primaries, and insures that BHO faces the weaker candidate in 2012.

    P.S. Did you get to keep the souvenir tin foil hat? Also.

  • albertofuente

    I would be embarrassed to admit authorship of that piece of garbage.

  • egilsson1

    WOLVERINES!!!!

  • abhiag

    “A lot of this comes from Washington, D.C. The trail is pretty direct and pretty obvious to us,” says Meg Stapleton, a close Palin adviser in Alaska.

    I am always curious when reporters find flacks saying things that are obviously false, whether the reporters ask the flacks if they have any proof. JNS, did you ask for substantiation for any of the statements that you dutifully quoted in the article? Did you ask them to prove that all the local ethics complaints were frivolous as they claim?

    Also, I wonder if the WH wouldnt actually love to see Palin run in the primary, if for nothing else just to spend all the money of the Republican base on Neiman Marcus’ clothes.

  • bobcn1

    ‘To me, one of the most interesting aspects of the story is how vehemently the Palin camp blames Barack Obama.’

    So what are YOU going to do about it? To me it sounds like the typical whining we hear over and over from the wingnuts — playing the victim card while they’re busy smearing their opponents. Are you going to pursue it or are you going to leave it as another ‘He said, She said’ accusation that just happens to smear the Dems and benefit Palin?

    Are you following it up with investigation of your own? Are you going to commit some journalism and try to confirm or debunk the charges? Or are you just going to leave the accusation hanging out there (with a little bit of promotion from you)?

    “I just hope to God Rahm Emanuel isn’t using taxpayer money to come after Alaska.”

    Do you plan to check?

  • Mr. Nice Guy

    OT: but worth a read. Here’s a discussion on how the government in spending money – $18 mil – to show us, the public, how it’s spending money on the recovery:

    http://news.slashdot.org/story/09/07/09/1711238/Recoverygov-To-Get-18-Million-Redesign

  • piper1

    As Rush Limbaugh interrupted his vacation to declare, “She is going to continue to fire up people in the conservative Republican base as often as she speaks to them.”
    .
    Good thing that conservative base is small and growing smaller. Sarah Palin has already gotten far too close to the White House for comfort.

  • http://phd9.blogspot.com Paul Dirks

    Résumés ain’t what they used to be; they count only with people who trust credentials — a dwindling breed. The mathematics Ph.D.s who dreamed up economy-killing derivatives have pretty impressive résumés. The leaders of congressional committees and executive agencies have decades of experience — at wallowing in red ink, mismanaging economic bubbles and botching covert intelligence.

    But would the same country that picked the lofty, cerebral liberal turn around four years later and embrace an earthy, instinctive conservative.

    These are all your words, not hers. I’m a bit worried.

    There’s a difference between distrusting resume’s (which speak much more about connections than abilities) and literally thinking that there’s something noble about being stupid.

    And conflating economic mismanagement with blowing the Iraq WMD question is just unaduterated hackdom.

    In case your memory is short the ‘botched intelligence’ was almost exclusively that of the press. Anyone with even an iota of skeptecism could see that we were being sold a bill of goods and that the actual ‘intelligence’ was perfectly sound.

    It was merely being lied about and duly misreported.

  • grape_crush

    On the other hand, moderates a general election target group.

    You left out the ‘are’ in this sentence, even though I don’t believe that Palin appeals to moderates.

    …it wasn’t a hard leap for anyone in her orbit to connect local progressive wingnuts and the Administration.

    Rouse and Elton are ‘progressive wingnuts’, why, exactly? Or are there some unmentioned Alaskan ‘progressive wingnuts’ agitating against Palin?

    Anyhow, conspiracies appeal to Palin’s base. Easier to think that “they’re out to get our Sarah” than admit that Palin is, at best, politically inept and intellectually lacking.

  • dwilli14

    I guess you guys have to feed your families like everyone else, right? Even so, it’s hard to digest that this is your contribution to the greater good. I love the “fair and balanced” below:

    “I’m not entirely convinced of Obama’s Nixon-esque sabotage capabilities…”

    Obama’s policies may not always work and some will backfire, but at least our President is a dignified family man. I’m a Christian, and I know exactly which one of the two I admire.

  • Cliff

    On the other hand, moderates a general election target group.

    What does this mean.

    I do think Palin has felt under attack for the last eight months and it wasn’t a hard leap for anyone in her orbit to connect local progressive wingnuts and the Administration.

    What does this mean.

    And did you think to ask Palin for an actual example of all these frivolous lawsuits being filed?

    I mean, did you ask her for evidence of anything she says?

  • kathy

    Jay, for cryin out loud. This is pathetic, worse than the interview. You think it’s interesting?? that Palin blames Obama???? You think she was going to change her mind about Obama pallin around with terrorists?

    The only thing interesting about it is that she’s a born-again conspiracy theorist who thinks the demons are out to get her, but she’s somehow conned a major news organization into taking her seriously. Facts. Where are the facts. You’ve disgraced yourself.

  • centfan

    JNS, just ask “What would Cronkite and Brinkley do?” in their heyday. Palin would be gone and the political discourse would return from somewhere other than the land of the Queen of Hearts and the White Rabbit.

    “Off with their heads” indeed…

  • abhiag

    Come on Nice guy, let the govt use 0.02% of the stimulus to create and maintain infrastructure for increased transparency of govt spending.

  • kathy

    Have you got an example of a “local progressive wingnut” for us? I’m afraid you’re referring to the local reality based community, not to mention the vast majority of your commenters.

  • deconstructiva

    JNS, thanks for new story. When’s her upcoming book due? What’s going to happen with SarahPac? It’s bemusing to notice the ONLY parallel with Obama: their fast-tracked careers. They both rose quickly and didn’t “pay their dues” as per convention. But that’s it, yes? He relied on intelligence, eloquent speech, and though out strategies. She relied on sheer will, word salad, and lots of sarahdipity. Unless she’s really burned out, I’m still betting she’s going for 2012. She has her base and still matters. But are her followers loyal to her or to the Repub.’s in the end? I hope it’s to her – they’ll split the R party and guarantee their loss.

    Otherwise will TIME hire her as the sixth Swampland blogger? I still maintain that you, Karen, and Amy can form a lunch / euchre club or other “Sex in the City” coterie. (psst, my hint – team her with Amy for euchre and you take KT, then play for money. You’ll win.) Think of the risible dialogue we’d have with her. She won’t hide in a church basement; she’ll engage us with a vengeance. It beats her being Commander in Chief.

  • dwilli14

    “A graduate of Tufts University and Columbia’s Graduate School of Journalism”

    ARE YOU REALLY? Wow, now I know the SATs and GREs are truly a disgraceful way to judge the ability of applicants.

  • 53_3

    JNS:
    The Palin camp blames Obama?

    Here, let me help you out with the getting from point A to point B on this one:

    If that’s not enough, here’s more:

    Crunch all you want, I’ll make more, JNS:
    http://crooksandliars.com/david-neiwert/mccainpalin-supporters-let-their-rac

    Get the picture*, JNS?

    *I wasn’t trying to pun, but since it worked out, what the hecks, damn the torpedoes and full speed ahead!

  • 53_3

    dwilli14:
    She’s aiming for a plum dangling from Texas Tech tree, I think. They have pretty low hanging fruit these days, I hear…

  • gysgt213

    I going to just say. The authors of that article can not be serious.

    Sarah’s major accomplishments since the election are that she was cleared of ethics violations by a board she has the power to fire and resigned her office while lying her way through her entire resignation speech.

    Prior to that, her major accomplishment was that she read a speech off the telepromter well and crashed and burned in every of the aspect of the campaign, besides calling Obama a terrorist’s best pal and almost sending her crowds into a crazed frenzy where some where filmed afterwards repeating her most wild charges about the Obama.

    Meg Stapleton her most incompetent spokesperson, blames every thing on Rahm and Obama and you guys seem to just take her for her word. Was there a sentence or paragraph I missed in the story where you asked Meg for evidence of her charges?

    Just for the record. A lot of people in the lower 48 had never heard of the AK bloggers until they tried their best to explain to us what

    Now team Sarah Palin 7 months into the Obama administration is on par with the Obama administation because of some snap shot in time polls that show Obama losing support. While the numbers of people indentify as GOP voters are at and all time low.

    Your conclusion. Obama better watch out.

  • bobcn1

    JNS wrote: ‘If ever there has been a time to gamble on a flimsy résumé, ever a time for the ultimate outsider, this might be it.’

    This is classic Rove — turn your opponent’s strength into a weakness, and vice versa. It wasn’t impressive résumés that got the country into the mess its currently in. Bush certainly didn’t have one — his ivy league education (acquired through legacy admissions — not merit) is peppered with ‘gentleman’s Cs’.

    Yes, Palin has a extraordinarily thin resume, but I don’t thing that’s the most important issue here. She has a much longer list of jobs that she either failed or abandoned. Her problem is lack of accomplishment — not lack of résumé.

    FWIW — My degree is in Mathematics. I can assure you that the Ph.D.s that JNS refers to in her article didn’t learn about how to perform their derivatives swindle from learning Math. That came from studying the teachings of the Gordon Gecko school of ‘Greed is Good’.

  • pintortwo

    Palin and her Alaska circle find evidence for their suspicions about the White House in the person of Pete Rouse, who lived in Juneau for a time before he became chief of staff to a young U.S. Senator named Barack Obama. Rouse, they note, is a friend of former Alaska state senator Kim Elton, who pushed the first ethics investigation of Palin, examining her controversial firing of the state’s public-safety commissioner. Both Rouse and Elton have joined the Obama Administration.

    Rouse was Senator Obama’s chief of staff well before Palin was on the national scene. Rouse brought along his friend Elton to Obama’s current staff. That equals a “pretty obvious” trail of “evidence” that “Obama operatives (are) wasting the Alaskan government’s time and resources”?!

    Can I have back my last 5 minutes please?

  • kathy

    Jay,the following is some perspective badly missing from your piece. Courtesy of mudflats.com, hosted by one of those people Sarah Palin probably thinks of as a “progressive wingnut”

    A number crunching Mudflatter sent the following:

    On a hunch, I reviewed online lists of all the men and women who’ve been elected governor of their state since the year 1900. Pored over them for a few hours. Over 1200 politicians have taken that first-term oath of office. Some soon died in office. Many resigned to accept other positions in government, including Spiro Agnew who was “tapped” by Nixon after being the Governor of Maryland for about five minutes. On a handful of occasions, a first-termer was dragged off to the slammer or impeached. One was incapacitated by a nervous breakdown and one left just as impeachment came knocking on his door. So—how many out of over 1200 just up and quit before the end of their term?

    Three: Jim McGreevy, Eliot Spitzer and Sarah Palin.

  • gysgt213

    Before anyone jumps here to claim that all of us are looking for a hit piece on Sarah Palin just save your typing please.

    What I am looking for is a piece that shows the country what it would be getting electing Sarah Palin to any type of national office. The evidence is there and its overwhelming.

    In my view Sarah Palin does not have what it takes to buckle down and do the hard work that this country would need her to do if she were to lead it. She does have what it takes to smooze with, glad hand and if necessary discard people to get her way. But that’s not leadership that is business. There is a difference.

    The evidence so far suggests that Sarah is willing to bend the truth to the point of lying. And hiring and firing people based on friendship and personal slights.

    A story like the one link to here gives people a false sense of who she really is.

  • pafro

    Palin’s surprise resignation has actually given her a bump amongst G.O.P. voters. She lost ground, though, with Dems and Independents
    This is so stupid on so many levels. According to this vapid reading of Palin as a presidential contender, Rush Limbaugh, James Imhofe, and Michelle Bachmann are pretty solid candidates to be President simply because the deadest of the dead-enders like them.

  • deconstructiva

    kathy, did McGreevy leave because of an affair? If yes, then bedroom stuff wiped out two of three, assuming Sarah’s still faithful.

  • http://thegrandpanjandrum.wordpress.com thegrandpanjandrum

    Evidently JNS is not aware of all internet traditions. Wingnuts=conservative, Moonbats=liberal. C’mon at least get the name calling correct. But, no worries! I can see New Hampshire from my front porch.

  • charlieromeobravo

    I have to agree (though more gently) with a lot of the above posts. If you’re going to transcribe the statements Palin and her people make implicating the Obama administration in this alleged conspiracy to bring Palin’s governorship to a grinding halt, at least try and examine the veracity of her claims somewhat. It’s not gotcha journalism nor biased journalism to actually follow up on the accuracy of her claims.

    That said, this article left me convinced that Palin clearly came of age as a conservative politician during the 2000s. She claims one thing and does something else entirely, like claiming to be a small government conservative while leaving her home town mired in debt. She operates on “truthiness” over facts and experience. She dominates the Alaskan government for better than half her career, goes out and excoriates her democratic opponents during the Presidential election then wonders why she not getting as much cooperation across the aisle when she returns home. People up in Alaska even talk about how viciously she was when she campaigned for mayor and governor (in a state small enough where everyone knows everyone else) despite previous standards of decorum. She’s a product of Bush / Rove style politics and Fox News fantasy reporting.

  • deconstructiva

    Maybe Jay wrote this just to (tick) use off, knowing we’d drive up her thread count. The thought of my being played like Jack Benny’s violin is solemnly amusing. I didn’t take that article too seriously, meh. Sarah’s runaway ambition, I do, and am wary about it.

  • destor23

    I think that Rahm Emmanuel and Barack Obama are out to get me too! JNS, when should I call for an interview?

  • Art Pepper

    the Palin camp blames Barack Obama

    Duh, Obama is too busy with his plan to take over the American economy so that he can destroy it from within, in order to get more people on welfare, which has something to do with reparations.

    Also he is promoting euthenasia of the elderly in the form of socialized medicine; negotiating with terrorists to impose Sharia law on the U.S. and put all Christians into FEMA concentation camps (with the help of the Census Bureau); and of course working to replace the U.S. dollar with an international currency.

    So I really don’t think he has time in his schedule to go after Palin.

  • jeff

    Stapleton thinks the president and chief of staff have time to worry about something as inconsequential as a batsh*t politican in alaska who can’t even keep it together to complete one term in a pretty easy job? she’s as loony as her boss.

  • deconstructiva

    If Bernanke helps BRIC establish a new world currency, will Michele Bachmann’s face be on the bill?

  • Art Pepper

    earthy, instinctive

    Oh, vomit. You guys are running out of euphemisms for “shallow and uninformed.”

  • http://phd9.blogspot.com Paul Dirks

    running out of euphemisms

    How about ‘bitter”?

  • shepherdwong

    “Are you following it up with investigation of your own? Are you going to commit some journalism and try to confirm or debunk the charges? Or are you just going to leave the accusation hanging out there (with a little bit of promotion from you)?”

    You’re barking up the wrong tree. If you want any real journalism – the truth about the native origins of Palin’s troubles – you’ll need to go elsewhere. And if you want the smart reporting about Palin’s likely motives for resigning – to try to make a pile of money while she’s a hot property – you’ll still need to go elsewhere.

  • mccainfluffer

    Is it any wonder why old journalism is dying?

    Keep reach for the stars, JNS!

  • bobcn1

    JNS wrote: ‘For Palin, the question might be, How thin a résumé and how unconventional a background will voters embrace? Obama — a first-term Senator with roots in Hawaii, Kenya and Indonesia — moved the bar quite a distance. But would the same country that picked the lofty, cerebral liberal turn around four years later and embrace an earthy, instinctive conservative? After all, President Obama will also be a lot more experienced in 2012.’

    Sigh.

    Ok, here’s my list again, just in case JNS, with her obsession with resumes, has forgotten. Neither the resumes, nor the accomplishments are very similar.

    1983 – Obama graduates Columbia University with B.A in international relations

    1983 – Obama works in NYC at the New York Public Interest Research Group

    1984 – Palin wins Miss Wasilla beauty contest
    1984 – Palin finishes second in the Miss Alaska pageant

    1985 – Obama takes job as director of the Developing Communities Project in Chicago

    1987 – Palin graduates University of Idaho (after attending four other colleges) with B.A. in communications-journalism

    1988 – Obama enters Harvard Law School
    1988 – Palin works briefly as a sports reporter for KTUU-TV in Anchorage

    1989 – Obama selected as an editor of the Harvard Law Review

    1990 – Obama elected president of the Harvard Law Review

    1991 – Obama graduates magna cum laude at Harvard Law School

    1991 – Palin elected president Wasilla PTA

    1992–2004 – Obama teaches constitutional law at the University of Chicago Law School

    1992–1996 – Palin elected to Wasilla city council

    1993-2004 – Obama works in 12-attorney law firm specializing in neighborhood economic development

    1996–2002 – Palin elected Wasilla mayor (pop. ~5500)

    1997–2004 – Obama elected to Illinois state Senate – 13th district (pop. 781,037)

    2002 – Palin loses race for lieutenant governor

    2003-2004 – Palin appointed Chairperson, Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission

    2004 – Obama elected to U.S. Senate (committees: Foreign Relations, Environment and Public Works, Veterans’ Affairs, Homeland Security, etc)

    12/2006-today – Palin elected Governor of Alaska (pop. 683,478) (San Jose, Ca pop. 989,496)

  • mccainfluffer

    Is it any wonder why old journalism is dying?

    Keep reaching for the stars, JNS!

  • Cliff

    Some might call that double post a bug, I call it a feature.

  • queencersei

    Team Palin had better start looking towards the right instead of the left. There is still a batch of Republican Presidential wanna-be’s out there. People who have logged a lot more man hours in government/private service then Sarah Palin. People who feel they are infinitely more qualified to be the Republican nominee for President (or even V.P) then Sarah Palin in. She and her camp are so concerned about the lefty-liberals and MSM. But it’s her fellow Republican hopefuls they had better start watching out for.

  • http://phd9.blogspot.com Paul Dirks

    I don’t think Palin actually wants to BE President nearly as much as she digs the processs of running.

    She just loves her some RALLYS!

  • http://www.taylormarsh.com/2009/07/09/sarah-palin-reveals-the-witch-behind-the-witch-hunt-the-white-house/ Sarah Palin reveals the witch behind the “witch hunt”: The White House | TaylorMarsh.com

    [...] http://swampland.blogs.time.com/2009/07/09/a-final-palin-post/#more-14455I haven’t posted on Taylor Marsh in more than a year. Things got pretty ugly during the primaries, with me equally lending to the combat. Since the election, I’ve chosen just to digest Taylor’s insightful analysis on many issues, particularly the administration’s foregin policy. But I’m guessing I wasn’t the only one taken aback by Taylor’s recent defense of Sarah Palin, calling even the reporting of speculation about pending ethics inquiries a “witch hunt.” Well, good news! Sarah Palin has revealed the witch behind the witch hunt: The White House. The President, Rahm Emmanuel and Pete Rouse. Her spokesperson told Time Magazine that they see a clear and direct route from the ethics investigations to the White House. I call it paranoia and an outrageous accusation from a sitting OR soon to be former Governor, but Taylor may differ. Their evidence: Pete Rouse, a 30 year veteran of Capital Hill well respected by the LEFT AND RIGHT, used to live in Alaska and now works for the President.  This post was submitted by NMP.No tags for this post. [...]

  • shepherdwong

    “Team Palin had better start looking towards the right instead of the left. There is still a batch of Republican Presidential wanna-be’s out there.”

    Just check out her negatives among Republicans. You can stick a fork in her as a national pol, I think. But I’m sure there’s a job somewhere in the MSM she’ll be perfect for.

  • notfooledtx

    Ms. Newton-Small, did you get your journalism degree from the same place as ms. Palin? After reading your last two writings, I’d have to say that it appears so. What crap. Whatever happened to real journalists that asked thoughtful questions? You’re an insult to your profession.

  • shepherdwong
  • http://teacherreaderwriter.wordpress.com/ Shakespeare in GA

    Wow. Just wow. McGreevy, Spitzer, and Palin. Quite the troika. Thanks for this, kathy.

  • http://phd9.blogspot.com Paul Dirks

    @shepherd,
    The embedded links work. They just aren’t visible as links unless you mouse-over.

  • http://teacherreaderwriter.wordpress.com/ Shakespeare in GA

    I think you are absolutely right.

  • shepherdwong

    Got it, PD, thanks. If you can’t see them then what’s the point?

  • deconstructiva

    “Ok, here’s my list again, just in case JNS, with her obsession with resumes, has forgotten. Neither the resumes, nor the accomplishments are very similar.”

    Alas, where do many employers look at a resume? The top / recent items (or bottom of list here) and just skim over the other stuff. “What have you done lately?”
    Palin – Governor, VP Candidate
    Obama – Senator, now President

    Both look high up the food chain from here. Sarah may not have accomplished much as gov. but she still became one. How, I’m not as sure. Not encouraging.

  • jake2008

    I really don’t understand what Palin is blaming Obama for. Her constant and continual use of the cultural victimhood card is just bizarre. I just hope she wins the Republican nomination so Obama can slaughter her again.

  • FlownOver

    I just hope to God Sarah Palin isn’t molesting children or engaging in necrophiliac bestiality with turkeys or wolves.

    Of course I have no reason to believe any of that is true, but apparently I should be able to express that horrific notion and expect an allegedly responsible news magazine to print it.

    And, btw, I’m just under a thousand miles from DC. Also.

  • B.A.M.

    It confuses me why she would quit as Governor to run in the 2012 elections. Unless you believe that the world will end December of that year a much better time to run would be in 2016.

  • FlownOver

    Shepherd:

    The point is to keep us coming back to ask for format improvements. They finally gave us paragraph breaks, didn’t they? That only took about forever!

    Seriously, you’re the umpteenth person to ask for highlighted links in the comments – and the more, the merrier.

    Note also: to reply to shepherd’s reply to PD, I have to say I’m replying to PD. I don’t happen to have anything to say to Paul at the moment, except maybe “Nice day, eh?”

  • http://nicewhitelady.blogspot.com/ joyomama

    May I say just how much I detest the hidden links in the new design?

    Also, if there’s anyone I would like to see even less of than Sarah Palin, it’s Meg Stapleton. Any journalist who takes anything she says at face value should turn in their steno pad and become a barrista. Ari Fleischer with b@@bs.

  • gysgt213

    Journalists do not take criticism well and neither do the talking heads. That is why they look past the criticism and instead start calling everyone crazy no matter what their point.

    Real world example of this type of conduct can be seen daily on Mornin Joe. Any type of email he receives that disagrees with whatever point he is trying to forced down peoples throat that day is viewed as extreme. As in extreme left. All liberal bloggers are extreme left and Joe goes out of his way NOT to have them on his little panels because everyone needs to agree with his talking points.

    Finally:
    .
    It is obvious that the term “Wingnut” is more often aimed at describing members of the political right than those of the political left.

  • FlownOver

    On review of this story I’m beginning to suspect the author thinks Palin’s irrationality will be obvious to all, and she (J N-S) need only expose the crazy to the light.

    That might be true in a more rational, intelligent world, but it’s contradicted – at least for a national medium – by two words: Senator Inhofe.

  • http://thewordwarrior.wordpress.com/2009/07/09/the-latest-scapegoat-offered-up-by-the-palin-clan/ The latest scapegoat offered up by the Palin clan « The Word Warrior

    [...] The latest scapegoat offered up by the Palin clan Posted on July 9, 2009 by Bento Rahm Emmanuel. [...]

  • palininatowel

    Hey, we’ve all moved past Palin. That’s why the dead tree edition is dead. You should be writing about John Ensign and the fact that he had his ma and pa cough up a hundred grand to the family of the woman he was flogging.
    .
    And that’s today’s Republican White Trash News!

  • gwbc

    I agree

  • Cliff

    I guess I missed the Meg Stapleton bus. The first time I heard of her was that phone interview with Anderson Cooper.

  • http://smoothlikeremy.blogspot.com/ sgwhiteinfla

    Yall are missing the point. JNS knows she will be getting the axe soon so this for her was more of a job interview than anything else. She is angling for a press secretary gig with Failin Palin. That could be the only logical reason why should would write this article like she was doing so with her nose firmly planted up Palin’s butt. Seriously…just think about it.

    LOL

  • Mr. Nice Guy

    So, JNS, is Sarah your new BFF? Do you wear the same shoe size? Did she give you a pair of her leftovers from the campaign?

  • tigerfitzroy

    This comment by “DeeinColumbiaMD”, from the first column, was so well written, that I am reposting it here:

    JNS – My fellow commenters have given such a thorough critique of your article that there is nothing that I could add that hasn’t already been covered. So please let me just give you one little piece of advice. Print out these responses and tack it to your mirror, your cubicle wall or wherever it is that you can be reminded of it daily. Perhaps then someday many years from now you will not be forced to ask yourself why you haven’t achieved your ultimate goal of winning the Pulitzer or whatever other accolade your industry covets. Rather than chalking up falling short to back luck or anything else beyond your control, you will have focused your attention on this interview and your failure to be prepared for the opportunity when it arose — the very definition of unlucky, and learn from this mistake. If you’re smart, you won’t dismiss these comments as the ramblings of a know-nothing folks sitting alone in basements in their pajamas and instead will heed these words and if and when you get another opportunity to shine, you’ll be ready.

    I’ve not heard nor seen a more profound blog comment. This just really made my day. Thanks Dee.

  • http://nicewhitelady.blogspot.com/ joyomama

    Meg has a lock on that job, and she’d rip JNS apart.

  • jcapan

    What Art Pepper said: i.e. “vomit”

    About the obsession w/ the topic, about JNS’ stunning failure to call bullsh!t: i.e. that she is literally as dumb as a box of f’ing rocks. My former community college students could speak more knowingly about the issues of the day.

    Re: the Swamp’s new digs:

    I agree with others who’ve said names to the left. Again, PAGE #s PEOPLE! And links in color.

    And can I say that the inability to type sh!t here in the puritan swamp is endlessly frustrating. I understand moderating f@ck/others but a simple pooh word.

  • jcapan

    Here’s a real journalist calling b-s on Jay and David’s
    fluff piece

  • Friar Tuck

    So – JNS is now flacking for Palin. I can certainly understand why she doesn’t want to respond to commenters, under the circumstances.

    I can only assume that JNS is trying to get a paying gig at the WaPo.

  • jake2008

    Another sad thing to me about Palin is she detracts from what Alaska really is. I’ll admit that Alaska is culturally unique among the 50 states, but it is one of the most breathtaking places on earth, where moose roam freely in cities and the fishing is great…

  • http://linkthe.com/2009/07/09/palin-blames-obama-for-troubles/ Palin Blames Obama for Troubles | linkthe.com

    [...] Blames Obama for Troubles July 9, 2009 · Posted in the man  Jay Newton-Small, who interviewed Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin (R) for this week’s Time magazine, notes that [...]

  • http://smoothlikeremy.blogspot.com/ sgwhiteinfla

    By contrast check out former Swamplander Mike Murphy who didn’t even have to travel to Alaska to get it right.

    http://www.nydailynews.com/opinions/2009/07/09/2009-07-09_to_go_forward_gop_must_snap_out_of_its_sarah_palin_spell.html

    Its obvious that Murphy should still be here, and someone else shouldn’t. im just sayin.

  • gysgt213

    Read Mike. Why did he leave this blog anyone know?

    At any rate after reading his piece and David Corns that Jcapan linked to it really puts in perspective how silly and aweful JNS’ piece was. OMG!

  • jcapan

    I wouldn’t go so far as saying Murph should still be here, but relative to JNS, or AS for that matter, well, you have me there. And he still doesn’t spell it out in plain ingles: s-t-o-o-p-i-d

    And Jake, I disagree. The people that come to such a conclusion about Alaska based on one particularly dim bulb aren’t that bright to begin w/. Or they’re the flyover elitist pricks Murph alludes to. I loathe W. more than anyone but I still love Texas.

  • gysgt213

    Palin quit and used the same reasons and tactics before? From 2004

    Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission Chairwoman Sarah Palin said Friday she is resigning amid frustration that she is being forced to keep silent about ethics allegations against Republican Party of Alaska chairman Randy Ruedrich.

    “I’m forced to withhold information from Alaskans, and that goes against what I believe in as a public servant,” Palin said in a Friday interview.

    Ruedrich, reached on his cell phone, wouldn’t discuss Palin’s resignation.

    Republican Gov. Frank Murkowski appointed both Ruedrich and Palin to the state commission last spring. In November, Ruedrich resigned the $118,000 commission job in the face of mounting criticism that his job and his party position presented a conflict of interest.

    As a top party official he was raising political funds from the same industries he regulated as a commissioner. In addition, allegations surfaced that Ruedrich was doing party business while he was on the state job as an oil and gas commissioner.

    Palin has deflected numerous questions from the press about the Ruedrich affair in recent weeks. The Alaska Department of Law has told her that she cannot talk about the ethics allegations against Ruedrich, even after she resigns.

    Palin said frustration over the gag order made her conclude it was time to quit, but she said it wasn’t the only reason. She wouldn’t detail what else contributed to her decision.

    She said her last day on the $122,400 job will be sometime next week.

    Last month, the Daily News made a formal public records request to obtain e-mails that could show whether Rued-rich directed the Republican Party of Alaska out of his office. Palin responded with a letter denying the request. It said the records must be kept confidential under state law.

    Neither she nor the state’s lawyers would give a specific reason under the law that required the e-mails be kept confidential.

    http://www.adn.com/sarah-palin/background/story/513761.html

  • Atanarjuat

    Governor Sarah Palin continues to scare the bejeezus out of all you America-hating leftists. Little wonder that you obsess on Palin’s every move and are willing to say or do anything to destroy her.

    Keep it up, libs. Your undying hatred is only making Sarah Palin stronger. I’m confident that she will rise to the challenge and help take back America from the socialist scourge that President Teleprompter is trying to sell (in the best tradition of snake oil salesmen, naturally).

    -A

  • ohiolib

    In other words, WAAAAAHH!!!! Why is every body always pickin’ on me?? Time to grow up, Sarah, and accept that running for national office will result in your every move being put under the microscope. Or whine about how unfair everything is, and watch as the little respect this country has for you evaporates.

  • ohiolib

    I hope Rahm reads that and turns it into an attack ad if Palin ever runs again. It would be beautiful.

  • Mr. Nice Guy

    If you were being snarky, Ok. If not, $18 mil is _quite_ a bit of money for a web site. You can buy a building, the network wiring, heavy-duty-never-go-down power and a large team of highly paid programmers for less than half that, and still be overcharging.

  • Mr. Nice Guy

    I _really_ wish you could just start your own country and take all like-minded folks with you. All of you Deliverance “banjo-boy” rejects gathered in one place, safe from the rest of us. Then, we could laugh and point at you as you flounder, amazed and shocked that your ideologies don’t work. Over time, you’d just become another NoKo, lashing out at everyone who looks askance at you, but unable to provide basic support for your people. Or a white Taliban.

    If you so love America, why would you ever consider a person so unprepared for the job to lead you? At some point, performance _does_ matter. Palin quits when the going gets tough. I might consider voting for a Palin-led ticket, if the VP candidate were actually capable.

  • Cliff

    My guess is that he was hired on to beat the drum for McCain, and once Gramps lost horribly Murphy got the hell out of Dodge.

  • Cliff

    Succinct, and wholly devoid of facts. Innovative word usage combined with a complete lack of innovation in ideas.

    A-

  • jcapan

    Here’s Matt Steinglass talking about “Why McCain matters”:

    “Andrew Sullivan has been trying to explain over the past few days that Sarah Palin matters because the decision to elevate ‘this unstable, erratic, know-nothing beauty queen’ to a potential Vice Presidential or Presidential spot reveals tremendous cynicism and irresponsibility on the part of John McCain, FOX News, and the Republican establishment. I think that’s largely true, but perhaps not entirely the way he’s thinking of it.

    Sullivan writes ‘McCain knew full well that Palin was unqualified to be commander-in-chief. But here’s the thing: John McCain is unqualified to be Commander-in-Chief. McCain is a guy of rather mediocre intellect, little curiosity, and very poor and impulsive decision-making skills. He’s vain and headstrong, and he easily turns opposition over matters of policy or politics into personal vendettas. He became a political commodity in 1973 because he embodied the right-wing working-class value of patriotism under duress at a moment when patriotism and the white working class felt under attack for their complicity in a disastrous foreign war. And he was seized upon by a desperate Republican Party in political free-fall; in the thick of Watergate, the Nixon administration launched him as a political celebrity. He then parlayed that notoriety into a political career a few years down the road. He certainly has a substantial amount of charm and an instinct for playing the press, and he’s hardly the dumbest guy in the Senate. But he is not a responsible or serious person. And to a great degree, when he met Sarah Palin, he probably felt he was looking at a younger version of himself. Which is to say that the “rot” in the GOP, the eagerness to substitute celebrity and resentful pseudo-patriotic gibberish for real political discussion, goes back a lot longer than 8 years.”

    Question: MS on Mac’s tireswing + JNS on Pal’s = ?

  • Allan Erickson

    Go ahead and kid yourselves, but you have not heard the last of Sarah Palin, or from millions who agree with her and support her. She will have the last laugh:

    http://allanerickson.wordpress.com/2009/07/09/sarah-palin-fights-back-by-resigning/

  • http://botd.wordpress.com/2009/07/10/top-posts-1169/ Top Posts « WordPress.com

    [...] A Final Palin Post I’m back from the Last Frontier with this week’s dead tree cover story on Sarah Palin, written with the [...] [...]

  • gwbc

    JNS

  • gwbc

    JNS is pallin around with paranoids

  • Mr. Nice Guy

    That URL didn’t strike you in the least bit as an oxymoron? Well, it’s an inventive strategy, I’ll grant you. “I’ll show you how tough and capable I am by not following through on my pledge and quitting on the people who voted me into office!”

    In this country, quitters have not, historically, been celebrated. It wows me that you R’s can turn what would otherwise be an instance of profound shame and embarassment into a “point of light.” Like hoisting Michael Phelps on your shoulders because half-way through his races he said, “I’m not going to swim any further.” Americans strive for gold. Palin, because she’s a proven quitter, doesn’t even get honorable mention.

    Is this what Republicans stand for? No wonder you’re a dying party.

  • http://phd9.blogspot.com Paul Dirks

    I still marvel that 25% of Americans can think it’s productive to refer to the other 75% as America-haters. SECCESIONISTS UNITE!!!!

  • http://elvisberg.wordpress.com Elvis Elvisberg

    Failin’ Palin: a Loser and a Quitter.

    Good luck with that!

    And remember, while she excels at repelling about 60 percent of the country, she isn’t even all that great at the raison d’etre of the GOP: pissing off liberals. We’re not angry, we’re laughing.

    Maybe she can learn how to articulate a coherent thought in a complete sentence between now and 2012. Probably not, though. She’s always been rewarded for her keen sense of grievance- and victimhood-based identity politics. No sense required. Why should she change? She can suck money, Ann Coulter style, from the ignorant whites of this great nation of ours, without changing one bit.

  • ilikechips

    I love checkin in on the far left extreme libtard Time reporters and posters here..Truly embaressing. JNS..gotta love ur stupid remarks how GOP and Palin blame everything on Obama..GEE..don’t remember your concern when everything was blamed on Bush during the Bush Derangement Syndrome years..JNS..keep smearing Palin like ur fellow libtard media reporters..u libbies are scared to death of her..and reporters wonder why readership is down..cause ur soo objective..lol

  • sherrie1690

    I would love to see a woman elected president, but certainly not Sarah Palin. I would be ashamed if the first woman president were an ignorant redneck whose husband wants to be the “first dude”. Excuse me, but “Caribou Barbie” just doesn’t cut it and I wish the media would stop giving her more coverage than she deserves. After all, with her help during the last election, many people who previously admired Sen. McCain ended up thinking he was senile and voted for Obama. As far as blaming Obama for her failures, perhaps the people of Alaska should thank him! I think the description of Palin in the August issue of Vanity Fair is probably true — she’s a “whack job”! Now can we talk about somebody else?

  • ilikechips

    JNS- u have once again shown your true colors..go write for Huffpo or Dailykos..U R no objective journalist..Better yet..go join fellow Time reporter Carney on team Obamessiah

  • Mr. Nice Guy
  • jicker

    Thank you for questioning this statement. It’s just one example of the BS that Palin & Co. sling around without ever being asked for evidence. (See also “The State of Alaska has spent $2 million on frivolous ethics complaints,” another lie currently being dismantled in the Alaska press and elsewhere.)

    If there’s anyone in Alaska who is more disliked right now than Palin, it’s Meg Stapleton. She was part of the self-named “Truth Squad” in Alaska during the election last fall. McCain’s campaign sent an operative named Ed O’Callahan to Alaska to help run the governor’s office–people would actually call into the state government and be directed to the campaign. Stapleton and O’Callahan held several press conferences (I use that term loosely) in an attempt to derail the Troopergate investigation through the character assassination of Walt Monegan and others. They accused Democratic state legislators and other Alaskans of being part of this vast leftwing conspiracy (directed by Obama, who had nothing better to do, apparently) in terms that can only be called “hysterical.” Also, “false.” You can find the videos on the ADN site. They are very mockworthy.

    The fact that Time is uncritically publishing statements like Stapleton’s shows how successful the Truthiness Squad was. Thanks for collaborating, Time.

  • tc125231

    If you’re Sarah Palin it’s always all about you, except when things go wrong.

    Then it’s ALWAYS someone else’s fault.

  • tc125231

    Well, if she does, my foolish friend, I guarantee you will be sorry.

    Competence is not a right-left issue.

  • tc125231

    Are you some kind of left wing troll trying to make Palin supporters look insane?

    Nice work.

  • tc125231

    You are confident? Good for you!

    Lots of luck with it. Very few people who dislike Palin are socialists –unless, of course, you thing Social Security is a Communist plot.

  • ohiolib

    I’m going to cross my fingers and hope this is the last we hear about Palin for a year or so. Then, when she runs for pres again, the circus will start all over again. At least Stephen Colbert will be happy…….

  • ohiolib

    I’m going to cross my fingers and hope this is the last we hear about Palin for a year or so. Then, when she runs for pres, the circus will start all over again. At least Stephen Colbert will be happy…….

  • ohiolib

    No “again” there. I should go to bed

  • nellcote

    Keeping in mind that Prez Obama’s secret security name is “Renegade”, as well the title of Richard Wolff’s very recently published book on Obama is “The Renegade”, I really have to wonder what the point of splashing “The Renegade” over LaPalin on the cover was.

  • alaskan2

    My thoughts exactly.

  • Cliff

    I love that this guy has literally NO IDEA what’s going on here.

  • alaskan2

    I was wondering the same thing. These two pieces on Palin are worse than fluff – they are inaccurate fluff. Time has sunk to a new low in journalistic ability and integrity.

  • oregonsue

    For a woman who accused President Obama of “palling around with terrorists,” and who incited some in her audience to chant, “Kill him! Kill him!” Palin certainly has a thin skin. Evidently she can dish it out but can’t take it. If you can’t take the heat, get out of the kitchen–or quit and go fishing. Whatever works for you.

  • alaskan2

    It appears that both Palin and Stapleton are suffering from very large doses of egomania and paranoia, a very frightening combination.

    These articles fail to expose the claims that Palin’s troubles in Alaska are somehow linked to Washington DC, the DNC, and the Obama administration for what they are: utterly preposterous. The ethics complaints were all filed by Alaskans, (including the one Sarah filed on herself, which accounts for 2/3 of the costs racked up by the personnel board). Only one filer is a Democrat. There is no conspiracy among the filers, who come from different walks of life and different political philosophies. One complaint resulted in ethics training for a top Palin aide as a result of a “series of troubling emails,” and another in Palin having to pay back $8100 for travel reimbursements she claimed, but was not entitled to. It is also very clear the reporters didn’t bother to do their homework on the “logo” complaint, as there is much more to that story.

    Why did these writers not discover that Palin’s claims that it doesn’t “cost the adversaries a dime” are as false as her claim that ethics complaints and public records requests have cost the state $2M? The costs to the requester for a basic public records request are astronomical. The “documentation” for the $2M lacks detail, doesn’t add up, and is contradictory, as well as failing to mention that most of the costs on it would have been paid whether or not any ethics complaints or information requests had been filed. It doesn’t take into account the fact that many of the costs were to be expected given that the governor was an unknown running for a national office, and have nothing to do with those pesky complaint filers, and it also doesn’t take into account the extra IT costs for records requests related to the governor’s use of unsecured private email accounts for state business, something there was no legitimate reason for doing.

    Palin may be an attractive woman, but she is unfit to be governor, much less a vice-president, and you are

    Palin was unfit to be governor, much less vice-president, and these writers are unfit to be called journalists.

  • alaskan2

    Oops – The last four lines should read:

    “Palin may be an attractive woman, but she was unfit to be governor, much less a vice-president and these writers are unfit to be called journalists.”

    Apparently at this hour, I’m unfit to be an editor. My apologies.

  • http://mosneagul.wordpress.com/ mosneagul

    never say never…

  • http://theliepolitic.com/2009/07/palin-blames-obama-for-troubles/ Palin Blames Obama for Troubles | The Lie Politic

    [...] Jay Newton-Small, who interviewed Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin (R) for this week’s Time magazine, notes that “one of the most interesting aspects of the story is how vehemently the Palin camp blames Barack Obama” for her troubles. “That’s the way they think about it: that these Alaskans filing ethics complaints have been hoodwinked by Obama operatives into wasting the Alaskan government’s time and resources.” [...]

  • opensourcepundits

    It’s not just being spent on making the site prettier, that’s just how right-wingers hope to spin it. There’s an immense amount of integration that has to take place.

    Considering they would have to build the site, then coordinate between 50 states, hundreds of municipalities, and countless city websites/budgets…$18 million doesn’t seem as far fetched as some would make it out to be.

    Also, it should be noted that it’s $18 million total, by 2014. So that’s spent over the next 5 years to upgrade and maintain – which would probably include the hefty security measures that all government sites are required to have.

  • opensourcepundits

    JNS,

    Why is it that journalists seem to lose all capacity to be intelligent while writing about Sarah Palin? Does her incompotence rub off on you all or something?

    If that’s the case, then please stop reporting on Sarah Palin for a few months…maybe you’ll get some credibility back. Or at least, if her ‘stupid’ is really that powerful, you’ll gain back the ability to not completely waste your reader’s time.

    If you really thought this bogus “it’s all Obama’s fault” meme they seem to believe was interesting…then why didn’t you ASK THEM ABOUT IT DIRECTLY when you were giving your interview?

    Instead, you asked “what’s wrong with Obama”. How patheticly powder puff…ugh, you really should be ashamed of that interview.

  • sacredh

    JNS: Don’t feel too bad about your interview. I met Neil Young backstage at a concert once and all I could think of to ask was “How are you doing?”. Was this similar?

  • http://phd9.blogspot.com Paul Dirks

    all I could think of to ask was “How are you doing?”.

    What a coincidence.
    Those were precise words to Al Franken when I encountered him in an airport.

  • http://blogs.wsj.com/capitaljournal/2009/07/10/political-wisdom-health-care-bills-are-an-%e2%80%98amazing-failure%e2%80%99/ Political Wisdom: Health Care Bills Are an ‘Amazing Failure’ – Capital Journal – WSJ

    [...] has a giant Sarah Palin spread this week and one of the authors, Jay Newton-Small, elaborates on how much the Palin camp seems to blame the Obama administration for problems. Meg Stapleton, a [...]

  • dunedweller
  • wagonjak3

    I agree with all of those posters here who say the Time puff piece of Palin was a disgrace, and that your blog here adds nothing but a further fluffing of her stature…

    My great hope is that I will never have to listen to the grating voice of hers, but with dishonest pieces like this from reporters who should know better, I suspect her annoying presence will be with us for a long time…

    Shame on you Jay, and shame on Time magazine!

  • wagonjak3

    And this from Peggy Noonan…

    “The media did her in.” Her lack of any appropriate modesty did her in. Actually, it’s arguable that membership in the self-esteem generation harmed her. For 30 years the self-esteem movement told the young they’re perfect in every way. It’s yielding something new in history: an entire generation with no proper sense of inadequacy.

    Turning to others means the media won!” No, it means they lose. What the mainstream media wants is not to kill her but to keep her story going forever. She hurts, as they say, the Republican brand, with her mess and her rhetorical jabberwocky and her careless causing of division. Really, she is the most careless sower of discord since George W. Bush, who fractured the party and the movement that made him. Why wouldn’t the media want to keep that going?”

  • pintortwo

    Priceless…

    Time’s own Paul Slansky linked to this clip, which discusses Palin, in his weekly review:

    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/07/06/fox-news-contributor-rips_n_226370.html

  • morethanamolehill

    “To me, one of the most interesting aspects of the story is how vehemently the Palin camp blames Barack Obama.”

    Didn’t Obamaman get elected by blaming everything on Bush? He certainly wasn’t running against McCain.

    In fact he still can’t get through a speech or a “presser” without Passing the Buck back to Bush.

  • morethanamolehill

    Now maybe you can get back to some important news, Like where Michael Jackson is going to be buried.

    The People Want To Know!!!

  • deconstructiva

    …or where is Michael Jackson’s brain? The LA coroner took it out ala CSI, really. Do they still have it? I’d cringe if Palin advisors flew down to LA and stole it.

  • sacredh

    JNS: Just to show how classy and compassionate us Swampcritters can be, please post a “1000 Words” with a photo of you and Sarah. Something with animal blood in it would be nice.

  • sacredh

    Maybe fish and a loaf of bread?

  • charlieromeobravo

    “Didn’t Obamaman get elected by blaming everything on Bush?”

    This may be true, but the difference is that we have 8 years of evidence pointing to how bad Bush did running the country. Believe it or not but Bush’s decisions actually do have an impact on our country that will reverberate for longer than 6 months after he leaves office.

    Palin’s “Oabama is responsible theory” is apparently based on the fact that a guy that used to live in Alaska went to work for Obama years before she existed politically.

    8 years of well documented incompetence is weightier evidence than an old mail address.

  • sacredh

    charlie: Please don’t use logic when posting about Palin. They go together like ketchup and cornflakes.

  • shepherdwong

    Didn’t Obamaman get elected by blaming everything on Bush?

    Not really. Obama was elected because all of the sane people blamed everything on Bush and all the rest of the Republican Party. Get it now?

  • sacredh

    I thought Obama got elected because millions of us took one look at the republican ticket and couldn’t stop laughing. I know it’s wrong to laugh at people with mental disabilities, but you have to admit that John and Sarah were a pretty good match for Dr. and Mrs. Strangelove.

  • http://phd9.blogspot.com Paul Dirks
  • http://swampland.blogs.time.com/2009/07/10/the-surreal-week-that-was/ The Surreal Week That Was – Swampland – TIME.com

    [...] Tumulty Friday, July 10, 2009 at 3:05 pm 2 Comments • Trackback (0) Jay Newton-Small may not be posting any more about Sarah Palin, but Paul Slansky is. As we like to do on Friday afternoons, we invite [...]

  • egilsson1

    How comical it is that Atanarjuat pulls out the sily teleprompter slur. It’s a classic case of projection.

    If there were EVER a politician who was the product of a teleprompter, it’s Palin. She rose to prominence based on her delivery from a teleprompter of a vicious speech that someone else wrote. Then she was kept sheltered from the press, but inevitability, each time she talked, more stupidity and more lies came flowing out.

    She’s hollow, and ridiculous. I almost hope the republicans do nominate her, because she’ll get 40% of the vote, if that, in a general election. But since I love America, I recognize that she is a dishonest, ignorant person, and the electoral process deserves better.

    Like most republicans these days, Atanarjuat is completely wrong. They really have no clue what’s going on.

  • http://pelinore.wordpress.com pelinore

    “The Thumpin” and Rahm Emanuel sound like a good fit.

  • morethanamolehill

    crb
    “This may be true, but the difference is that we have 8 years of evidence pointing to how bad Bush did running the country.”

    Yeah I remember that 5% unemployment rate, No terrorist attacks, Flowing economy, increased revenue from the tax cuts, Cheap gas, Low Foreclosure rate. The only thing Bush should have done differently was bash back at a few of the rabid moonbat bashers.

    Then the Dems took the house in ’06 and gas doubled in 17 months. the economy took a dive and here we are.

    Bush didn’t run the country alone. The Demsters need to Man up and take some responsibility for thier own actions.

    We invaded Iraq for oil?? We wouldn’t have had to if the Dempsters would stop preventing us from drilling our own.

    “Palin’s “Oabama (sic) is responsible theory” is apparently based on the fact that a guy that used to live in Alaska…”

    No, I think that her “theory’ is based on the fact that the democrat party sent 30 lawyers to Ak to dig up any little bit of dirt on her they could find. Hell the media has spent more time investigating Joe the Plumber than Barack Obama. And Palin has withstood 10 times the barrage of JtP.

    “8 years of well documented incompetence…”

    HuffPo doesn’t count. Just because a rabid moonbat says it doesn’t make it true.

  • morethanamolehill

    “…or where is Michael Jackson’s brain? The LA coroner took it out ala CSI, really. Do they still have it? I’d cringe if Palin advisors flew down to LA and stole it.”

    Actually they may have done just that….

    http://newsrealblog.com/2009/07/09/al-sharpton-show-did-sarah-palin-do-something-to-michael-jackson/

  • http://riveroflifelisajoygoogle.com riveroflifelisajoy

    what caused her to leave mid stream….complete the task…then you and thump better.. i thought that was the method to become a president….hold to the task and complete it. ???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????/

  • 53_3

    “Bush didn’t run the country alone.”

    And the sun rises in the West, too…

  • fixinggovernment

    Obama has made the Clinton’s irrelevant.

  • ohiolib

    That’s right. Cheney helped too

  • robertbe

    I don’t pretend to understand SP at all but in general the right wing of the GOP is retreating into the echo chamber and falling in love with being outsiders. I think she is joining in with that movement. Although I doubt she is abstracts it quite that way (or abstracts anything much at all).

    All of which is easy to dismiss as a dead end, and odds on it is. But, there is a real risk that if tough times go on to long the wingnutia could win some offices. At which point start buying canned goods. (or come visit us here in Australia, please form an orderly queue).

    Glenn Beck is a clown but history tells us that clowns like him can end up leading movements that have real and horrible impact (usually by running full tilt at the cliff’s edge). The Bill Kristol’s of this world delight in empowering such clowns just to see the looks their opponents faces. Proof, as it more proof were needed, that they are, in fact, the work of the devil

  • http://2parse.com/?p=3372 Why I Despise Sarah Palin – 2parse

    [...] giant conspiracy. As a local blogger files a frivolous ethics complaint, Palin claims she is being targeted for persecution by Rahm Emanuel and Barack Obama. A similar logic of collective victomhood makes its way into every speech she gives; she [...]

  • http://shannynmoore.wordpress.com/2009/07/15/its-not-sarahs-fault-just-ask-her/ It’s Not Sarah’s Fault…Just Ask Her « SHANNYN MOORE: JUST A GIRL FROM HOMER

    [...] The ethics complaints against the governor were “unscrupulous” and Obama driven. [...]

  • winski

    Meg seems to be very full of herself…as does dim wit…get them a quick message please…”Your not important.”:

  • http://sarahpalintruthsquad.wordpress.com/2009/07/21/its-not-sarahs-fault-just-ask-her/ It’s Not Sarah’s Fault…Just Ask Her! « Sarah Palin Truth Squad

    [...] The ethics complaints against the governor were “unscrupulous” and Obama driven. [...]

  • deconstructiva

    …but then there’s this?
    [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jO6dmBm1SFw]

  • deconstructiva

    try again

  • http://sarahpalintruthsquad.wordpress.com/2009/08/29/sarah-palins-obama-obsession/ Sarah Palin’s Obama Obsession « Sarah Palin Truth Squad

    [...] printed in the article, but included in a blog posted by Time reporter Jay Newton-Small, were some additional comments on the alleged conspiracy. [...]

  • http://www.politicalforum.com/current-events/98362-obama-not-losing-sleep-over-fox-news-beef-13.html#post1818961 Obama ‘not losing sleep’ over Fox News beef – Page 13 – Political Forum

    [...] SP? That's because Palin has become Obama's arch-nemesis in the Palin Derangement Syndrome war. The Obama Nation is intent on bringing Palin down at all costs. I'm wondering how long before Obama calls out a hit squad on her? He'll probably wait [...]

  • http://ChristianTerrorist.com Real Prick

    I pray to all that is holly that our country can survive the attack its been under from those that have discovered how to make themselves rich off hate mongering, like Sarah Pallin and Glenn Beck.

  • http://riverdaughter.wordpress.com/2010/09/23/thursday-news-and-views-4/ Thursday News and Views « The Confluence

    [...] You can read more about that at the WaPo link and at Swampland. [...]

  • http://blacknewstribune.com/2010/10/geoffrey-dunn-pete-rouse-and-the-lies-of-sarah-palin/ Geoffrey Dunn: Pete Rouse and the Lies of Sarah Palin | BlackNewsTribune.com

    [...] didn’t make the printed version of the magazine, but was included in a blog by Time correspondent Jay Newton-Small, were two additional comments by Stapleton. “I just [...]

blog comments powered by Disqus