The Fili-Boehner

There’s a privilege granted to leaders of both parties in the House to speak for as long as they want on the House floor on whatever subject they want. After nearly five hours of debate on the climate bill, House Minority Leader John Boehner took the floor around 5:30pm and began speaking about the 300-page chairman’s amendment added to the bill at 3am this morning. He’s been reading, and mocking, choice passages. Twenty minutes later, House Energy & Commerce Chairman Henry Waxman interrupted to ask when he might be done and what the precedent is for limiting a leader’s speaking privileges. Rep. Ellen Tauscher, who is presiding over the floor on her last day as a member before heading to the State Department to become Under Secretary of State, ruled that there is no precedent and allowed Boehner to continue . He’s been speaking for nearly 50 minutes now and his staff says he’s “prepared to go quite a while.”

“Now I really hate to do this,” Boehner said on the floor, “but when you file a 300-page amendment at 3am the American people have a right to know what’s in this bill and what we’re voting on.”

The Dems have stopped whipping the bill, confident that, although it will be close, they have the votes. The problem is: if Boehner goes hours and hours they risk losing members to flights, commitments, etc. I’m checking with the House Historian, but it seems we have our first House filibuster. Now, the real question is: how long can Boehner, a notorious chain smoker,  go without a cigarette? (I’ve never seen him go longer than 30 minutes without one, so he’s already shattered that record).

Update:
After over an hour, Boehner relinquished the floor. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, in the interest of saving time, curtailed her closing remarks to four words, telling members she believes this bill is all about, “Jobs, jobs, jobs, jobs.”

Subscribe to Jay Newton-Small on Facebook
Related Topics: Uncategorized
  • Latest on Swampland

    Gary Cameron / Reuters

    The Foreclosure Deal: Obama and the Banks Win Big While Homeowners See Modest Reward

    Those of you who have read our previous coverage of the back and forth between the state attorneys general and five major mortgage servicers know that the settlement announced on Thursday is a massive, complicated, multi-year deal negotiated by the country’s most ambitious public prosecutors, its most powerful financial institutions and some of the highest-paid lawyers in New York City. There are several levels to judge it on: the help it gives homeowners; its benefit for various political players; and what it may do for the economy. But overall, it’s a clear win for Obama and Democrats, a qualified win for the banks, and a minor, belated victory for homeowners.

    Romney: 'I Misspoke'HuffPost Politics

    Mitt Romney’s Sweet Spot: Just Conservative Enough

    Why is Mitt Romney having trouble winning over the conservative Republican base? One reason is his lack of political finesse, an air of dorky rich-guy aloofness that reminds some people of John Kerry. More important, however, is his ideological profile. In almost every important way, Romney’s policy platform is more moderate than those of Newt Gingrich and Rick Santorum. Gingrich  offers a much more conservative tax plan, along with crowd-pleasing ideas like his plan to sic federal marshals on “radical” liberal judges. Santorum carries a blazing social-conservative torch, championing ideas like a constitutional ban on abortion. Both Gingrich and Santorum talk quite openly about the virtues of bombing Iran. Romney’s temperature runs cooler in all these areas. Not to mention his past record of pro-choice, pro-gay rights positions. As Jon Chait notes today, the GOP establishment is defending Romney but also working hard to push him to the right.

  • Cliff

    Rahm should go in there and start lighting up in front of the orange SOB.
    .
    Just be all, “Aw yeah, this nicotine really hits the spot. I think I’d die if I had to go another five minutes without one.”

  • jcapan

    “The Fili-Boehner”
    ~
    Aside from the double entendre, any relation between that title and:
    ~
    “I say hopefully because I want to get out of here at a decent hour today!”
    ~
    Don’t come between JNS and her happy hour!

  • http://smoothlikeremy.blogspot.com/ sgwhiteinfla

    Its a double edged sword though JNS. Republicans are gonna get the hell up out of there rather than stay to cast a no vote when they know it won’t matter. And with fewer Repubs there its a good chance that Dems will feel empowered. I am just saying.

  • sacredh

    Larry Craig should make a guest appearance and fire up a White Owl.

  • spob

    Of course, Cliff, the fact that the Dems are cramming a 300 page amendment down everyone’s throats has no issues for you.
    .
    JNS, by the way, on Kyoto, it’s just you. There are many countries with no GHG limits . . . .

  • spob

    Oh, and another thing, didn’t Pelosi promise that the House would be respectful of the minority? I seem to recall her doing that. If Boehner’s your bad guy, perhaps, just perhaps, you could give your assessment of how this cap and trade ramjob is consonant with Pelosi’s promises.

  • spob

    sacredh, re: Larry Craig I believe that’s a trollish comment.

  • http://smoothlikeremy.blogspot.com/ sgwhiteinfla

    More arguing with a brick wall will resume I assume so I bid you guys a good evening. Have at it.

  • spob

    hey sg, did ya see the Jena Six pleas? Seems they admitted that Barker did not provoke the attack–so then the question is what was their motivation . . . . hmmmmmmmm. Maybe there should be a civil rights prosecution . . . .

  • sacredh

    I think I am a troll. Not a very happy one either.

  • deathbypapers

    I have to agree with spob on the 300 page thing. Without any additional information, I think that adding 300 pages at 3 AM is quite unethical.

  • spob

    it’s certainly not consonant with Pelosi’s promises upon becoming Speaker . . . .

  • deathbypapers

    consistent, please you do yourself no favors with simple typos.

  • Cliff

    consistent, please you do yourself no favors with simple typos.
    .
    /facepalm
    .
    con-so-nant:
    –adjective 3. in agreement; agreeable; in accord; consistent (usually fol. by to or with): behavior consonant with his character.

  • spob

    i thought “consonant” was correct–is it not?

  • matthewmcguire

    All I know is that Pelosi made a vowel, and we should hold her to it.

  • deathbypapers

    wow, maybe I need to refresh my grasp of the English language. damn homonyms. consider the snark withdrawn.

  • spob

    or synonyms, right?

  • http://smoothlikeremy.blogspot.com/ sgwhiteinfla

    Just back to point out that the bill passed. With 8 Repub votes.

  • ifthethunderdontgetya™³²®©

    .
    “Now I really hate to do this,” Boehner said on the floor, “but when you file a 300-page amendment at 3am the American people have a right to know what’s in this bill and what we’re voting on.”
    .
    Can anyone recall what Boner had to say about the “Spying on Americans Without A Warrant Act”?
    .
    I’ll summarize:
    .
    Oh My GAWD we’re all going to die right now unless you muslim loving commies pass this Bill that Republican Jebus wrote! Do not waste time trying to read it! I am quivering in terror and pissing my tighty-whities that already have a wicked brown streak in the back because Osama’s gonna get me!
    ~

  • sacredh

    ifhtethunderdontgetya: I seriously doubt the esteemed representative from my home stste said that. Did he really say “Osama’s gonna get me”? The rest I can believe.

  • ifthethunderdontgetya™³²®©

    .
    Sacredh, did you see that I also called Sherrod?
    ~

  • sacredh

    I just linked. I call my reps all the time. I think they must have caller ID now because I sometimes don’t get through. I even asked once if I had any messages.

  • yutsano

    I think I am a troll. Not a very happy one either.
    -
    Why do you set yourself up so?

  • hellslittlestangel

    “…Boehner, a notorious chain smoker…”
    .
    Huh. We all thought it was tanning booths that turned his skin that weird color.

  • sacredh

    yutsano: It’s just been a bad day. I injured my back recently and then just when I thought it was starting to get better, I SNEEZED last night at work and threw it out again. I’m back to using a TENS unit, pain patches and vicodin es’s. On top of that I have a huge set of brick border stones and paving stones sitting in the yard that I can’t put in because of my back.

  • sacredh

    We haven’t had a “1000 Words” for two weeks either. I’m in the mood to whine today.

  • pirate wench (demwoman)

    Sacred –
    .
    Sorry t’ hear yer still in pain, me hearty! Feel better soon – tha’ be an’ order!
    .
    YARR!

  • sacredh

    Thanks pirate wench. I shouldn’t complain. I just want to.

  • sacredh

    Heigh ho, heigh ho, it’s off to work I go.

  • Exiled_At_Home (formerly neo)

    Full Disclosure. This is Neo. I made the ghastly error of changing my moniker and commenting three times out of impulse without clarification. Within a short period I addressed a post by SZ and informed that I was neo responding to his post. However, this egregious lapse in judgment on my part, as Pirate will attest, was merely a ploy to act as someone else who supported my view. This is why once realizing that people may not have noticed the change in moniker I immediately informed SZ in my post that I am, in fact, neo. How horrendously manipulative of me. Will you forgive, Pirate?

  • jcapan

    If by “full disclosure” you mean OT and self-absorbed, then no worries man.
    ~
    But might I suggest, the next time you want to masturbate, don’t ask us to watch.

  • Exiled_At_Home (formerly neo)

    Back-pain is not off-topic?

  • Cliff

    We haven’t had a “1000 Words” for two weeks either. I’m in the mood to whine today.
    .
    What we could do is go find a picture off the TIME picture blog (or Flickr or whatever) and comment on that. You know, make our own 1000 Word post.

  • Cliff

    Back-pain is not off-topic?
    .
    sacredh is granted a special dispensation for being continually entertaining.

  • Exiled_At_Home (formerly neo)

    I personally have no qualms with off-topic discussions, citations, interesting tidbits of knowledge, or observations. But to continually hear allegations of people going off-topic as some sort of rhetorical victory in discussions is laughable, yet a bit annoying.

  • tilliswynette

    This bill reminds me of the witch hunt by liberals against the cigarette when they launched all their bogus scientific claims about the dangers of smoking just so they could destroy the tobacco industry, the South’s very own native son. Here they go agains, using the myth of global warming as a pretext to destroy Exxon and the Great State of Texas.

  • 53_3

    tilliswynette:
    .
    Well, It’s ok. Much of the coast of Texas (which is no “greater” than any other state, btw!) is below 440ft of elevation.
    .
    I’m sure you’ve find the shoreline running sw – w a few miles south of Houston and Dallas/Ft Worth a splendid event.
    .
    What should we call this particular epieric sea?
    .
    The Limbaugh sea, of course. We could have Bush bay, extending SE of Houston, and the Sanford Salton sea a few miles north of Dallas.
    .
    Landlocked, you know. No outlets to Argentoony. Sorry tilliswynette, you’ll just have to get used to it.
    .
    Look at it this way:
    .
    At least you won’t have earthquakes…

  • Exiled_At_Home (formerly neo)

    Tillis-
    While you’re certainly entitled to your opinions and I am of somewhat similar mind as to the assault on particular industries, this strikes me as an odd, if not reality-denying, phrase: “bogus scientific claims about the dangers of smoking.” As a smoker myself, I certainly have noticed the negative effect it has on my health. There’s really no denying that.

  • yutsano

    While you’re certainly entitled to your opinions and I am of somewhat similar mind as to the assault on particular industries, this strikes me as an odd, if not reality-denying, phrase: “bogus scientific claims about the dangers of smoking.” As a smoker myself, I certainly have noticed the negative effect it has on my health. There’s really no denying that.
    -
    You’re in for a major tough fight if/when you decide to quit N-R. Nicotine is a VERY addictive substance. I do hope for the sake of your health that you decide smoking just isn’t worth it anymore.

  • sacredh

    I didn’t start smoking until I was 45 and I’m hopelessly hooked. I’ve quit several times only to start again. Smoking is the worst mistake I’ve ever made. Cigarettes here are around $6 a pack here. I found a flavored cigar I like that’s only $1.15 a pack. Dean’s. I can’t even smoke my old brand anymore, they taste too harsh. My wife actually found them. We went from a $20 a day habit to a less than $5 a day habit. If there is a God, coffee and cigarettes in the morning was one of his better ideas.

  • yutsano

    If there is a God, coffee and cigarettes in the morning was one of his better ideas.
    -
    Amazing story: I started smoking because I was working in a restaurant and the only way you got ANY kind of a break period was if you smoked. After I quit and went back to college, my urge to smoke mysteriously evaporated. I don’t know if I just don’t have the addictive gene or what, but I just stopped and never looked back. Coffee on the other hand, is an institution in the Northwest. There isn’t QUITE a holy shrine to Starbucks up here, but there is a square in downtown Seattle that highlights the coffee culture of this place rather neatly. Not to mention the BEST stuff comes out of the local shops and roasters.

  • jcapan

    Yuts, I only spent a year in the NW, but the little drive-thru espresso boxes were my favorite. The first morning I spent in OR, I drove east out of Salem, eventually reaching Sisters in desperate need of a jah-fix. The girl even stuck a chocolate covered coffee bean to the top. A dangerous region for someone like me, whose addiction is nothing short of a vice (my only remaining one, so I pour all my energies into it).

  • Exiled_At_Home (formerly neo)

    Sacred
    ~
    Coffee and stoges, indeed a Godsend!

  • sacredh

    I started drinking coffee at roughly the same time I started smoking. It’s like hot apple pie and vanilla ice cream. It’s hard to imagine anything going together as well. The first cigarette in the morning with a hot cup of coffee just makes the day start out so nice. The cigars I smoke (they’re milder than any cigarette I’d ever smoked) come in several different flavors. I smoke vanilla, cherry, wild berry, peach, rum and menthol. For some reason the chocolate ones give me a headache.

  • yutsano

    Yuts, I only spent a year in the NW, but the little drive-thru espresso boxes were my favorite. The first morning I spent in OR, I drove east out of Salem, eventually reaching Sisters in desperate need of a jah-fix. The girl even stuck a chocolate covered coffee bean to the top. A dangerous region for someone like me, whose addiction is nothing short of a vice (my only remaining one, so I pour all my energies into it).
    -
    I’d make the argument you left wayyy too soon, but love makes us do things we never thought we would! When I went to Atlanta, I literally went NUTS trying to find a drive-thru coffee shop just because, well, NO ONE up here gets out of their car if all you’re doing is getting coffee! You sit in the shop as a social event or for gathering with friends, if all you need is a fix, you drive up and go! (I just realized I went a little crazy with the exclamation points.)
    -
    I started drinking coffee at roughly the same time I started smoking. It’s like hot apple pie and vanilla ice cream. It’s hard to imagine anything going together as well. The first cigarette in the morning with a hot cup of coffee just makes the day start out so nice.
    -
    Coffee and tobacco have similar flavor notes on the tongue, so the pairing seems natural to me. I know that when I was in college the most popular coffee place allowed smoking, I’m thinking that reasoning had something to do with it.

  • 53_3

    “If you’re going to be, for example, the party of fiscal discipline and be the person who’s talking about fiscal responsibility, then you better do that. Hypocrisy doesn’t sell. And, the Republicans have to be true to their values, true to their principles and walk the walk.”
    .
    Pawlenty, on the GOP:
    http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2009/06/28/pawlenty-gops-clearly-been-damaged

blog comments powered by Disqus