The President’s Feisty Press Conference

My TIME.com piece on Obama’s press conference today begins like this:

Even within the White House complex, the opposing teams each have their own turfs. In the halls of power — the Oval Office, the East Room and the Rose Garden — the President oversees his domain. But just a few steps away sits the White House briefing room, a hotbox of cameras and television lights, where the President holds no real dominion. Here the press corps — a ragtag assortment of denim-clad cameramen, unkempt writers and preening television talkers — makes its home. When government officials come to visit, they enter a different space and are generally asked to prove themselves. Questions fly fast.

//

Barack Obama scheduled his Tuesday press conference, like the three that came before, on home turf, in the Rose Garden, just outside his office. But owing to the heat, the event was moved inside at the last minute — to the foreign soil of the briefing room. And the press corps, which has been deferential through repeated prime-time pressers in the East Room, began to assert itself as never before in his tenure.

Related Topics: Uncategorized
  • Latest on Swampland

    Robert F. Bukaty / AP

    In Maine, Ron Paul Vies to Extend Mitt Romney’s Losing Streak

    Mitt Romney hoped to avoid a fourth straight election setback Saturday in the GOP presidential nomination race, but feisty Ron Paul could extend that losing streak with a victory in Maine’s caucuses.

    Romney: I Was A 'Severely Conservative' GovernorHuffPost Politics

    Ben Garvin / The New York Times / Redux

    Political Pictures of the Week, Feb. 4-10

    TIME’s photo editors bring you the best pictures of the past week from the Beltway and beyond.

  • themaverickformerlyknownasbasilbrush

    My TIME.com piece on Obama’s press conference today begins like this

    ……………………

    And a darkness gathered over the earth, the sun sickened, and all was desolate. In short, another Michael Scherer piece.

  • gysgt213

    “Chances are, he won’t be back in that enemy territory for a long time to come.”
    .
    And ends like the above. Why won’t he back Mike? Is scared of you Chuck and Jake?

  • gysgt213

    “the press corps, which has been deferential through repeated prime-time pressers in the East Room, began to assert itself as never before in his tenure.”
    .
    By the way Mike. I love how you deferential you people were doing Bush’s years and Clinton’s.

  • Paul-no not that one

    Wow this one is a keeper MS. Probably not for the reasons you think.
    The media we have-it is all about us.
    It reads like an Onion story about how strong and brave the media is.

  • pirate wench (demwoman)

    Michael, me lad,
    .
    This piece truly be a reekin’ pile o’ subjective amateur psycho-babble sh*t, bucko!
    .
    Next time, take th’ time t’ be considerin’ whether yer contention – seemin’ly th’ President were owned by th’ press an’ won’t be back soon t’ face ‘em ag’in – be valid b’fore embarrassin’ yerself (ye’re not? Ye ought t’ be, laddie, ye ought t’ be!) li’ this ag’in!
    .
    I be ri’ disappointed in ye.
    .
    YARR!

  • textee

    Time magazine asserts: “When government officials come to visit, they enter a different space and are generally asked to prove themselves. Questions fly fast.”

    -

    Not quite. “When government officials [approved by the White House press corps (i.e., fellow Democrats)] come to visit” members of the White House press corps get on their knees and ask such probing “questions” like Jeff Zeleny of the New York Times-Democrat did to the clueless socialist, to wit: “What enchanted you the most as president?”

  • Paul-no not that one

    Same story, same theme, different take from David Kutz-
    .
    An animated and testy President Obama during this presser. Partly a function, I think, of him pushing back hard on two media/GOP narratives: one, that he’s not been strong enough on Iran so that his recent harsher rhetoric amounts to a shift in his position; and, two, that a public option health care plan would put insurance companies out of business.

    Will be interested to see if his rejection of those narratives, and particularly his dismissiveness of reporters who perpetuated them, has the desired effect of shifting the narrative.

    More broadly, Obama knocked around reporters for some of the gotcha questions, especially on Iran, telling NBC’s Chuck Todd that while the press is on a 24-hour news cycle, “I’m not.”
    .
    http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/2009/06/testy.php?ref=fpblg
    .

  • gysgt213

    Did anyone see the bit@hing from Politico because Obama called on a Huffington post blogger? I’m not linking to them because they are bunch of WATB.

  • FlownOver

    Media analysis:

    Media Win! Media Win! Media Win!

    P-nnto’ s quote zeroed in on the primary factor at work: “media/GOP narratives”

  • http://smoothlikeremy.blogspot.com/ sgwhiteinfla

    And the press corps, which has been deferential through repeated prime-time pressers in the East Room, began to assert itself as never before in his tenure.

    .
    BUHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
    .
    Come on Time layoffs!!!

  • choska

    Oh my. Michael, you must be glutton for punishment or a masochist. Why on Earth would you come to this forum and promote a story asserting that the White House Press Corpse is somehow a fearsome source of highly penetrating questions for government officials?
    .
    There are two things that nearly everyone in this country, Progressives and Conservatives) agree on: Hitler was bad, and the Mainstream Media is incredibly bad at asking questions of US Presidents.
    .
    We don’t all agree on why Hitler was bad, or why the media is bad at asking questions of the President, but we agree on the statements.

  • gysgt213

    Plot thickens.
    .
    On Tuesday, sources told News 4′s Nigel Robertson that a state vehicle is missing and was tracked down, not to the Appalachian Trail, but to the Hartsfield-Jackson Airport in Atlanta.
    .
    Sources told Robertson that a federal agent spotted Sanford in the airport boarding a plane. Robertson was told that the governor was not accompanied by security detail.
    .
    Sanford has been out of reach for more than four days, including Father’s Day.
    .
    Sawyer has emphasized that the governor was hiking on the Appalachian Trail and that it wasn’t something the staff or Jenny Sanford were concerned about.
    .
    But sources told WYFF News 4 that the federal agent who spotted Sanford saw him at the Atlanta airport, which is about 80 miles from the start of the trail.
    .
    WYFF News 4 has not yet confirmed where the plane was going or how the governor got to the airport, but it is clear there are two very different stories.
    .
    News 4 called the governor’s office, and was told again by staffers that they stand by their original statement that the governor is hiking the Appalachian Trail. They did not want to comment on this story.
    .
    http://www.wyff4.com/news/19837234/detail.html

  • http://phd9.blogspot.com Paul Dirks

    Hmmm,
    I read through the entire piece and at no time was it mentioned that he made you guys seem like complete idiots.
    .
    Clearly biased reporting in action.

  • Friar Tuck

    When government officials come to visit, they enter a different space and are generally asked to prove themselves. Questions fly fast.
    .
    Jeebus, Scherer, do you think you belong to the Justice League or something? Get a grip. Obama showed y’all up for the vapid pod of corporate weasels you are.
    .
    But go ahead and pat yourself on the back, if that makes you feel better.

  • gysgt213

    “I read through the entire piece and at no time was it mentioned that he made you guys seem like complete idiots.”
    .
    This from Mike Allen. Front page story over at politico.
    .
    What Obama didn’t mention.
    .
    A couple of surprising words were missing from President Barack Obama’s 55-minute news conference on Wednesday: “Iraq” — and “Afghanistan.”
    .
    Also MIA: “Korea,” “Pakistan,” “soldiers,” “surge” and “war” — as well as the Army, Navy, Air Force and Marines.
    .
    The omissions were partly a result of the short attention span of the press, which did not ask about those topics after the president did not mention them in his opening statement.
    .
    But the silence
    .
    on those subjects also provides a striking illustration of one of the singular differences between Obama and his predecessor.
    .
    Whereas President George W. Bush invoked his status as wartime commander in chief so often that it seemed like a crutch, Obama has much more of a domestic focus, and resists rhetorical calls to arms like “war on terror.”
    .
    It’s the Mars and Venus of the 43rd and 44th presidencies.
    .
    But don’t be looking for “enemy,” “troops” or “wounded” in the press conference. They aren’t there.

    http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0609/24106.html#ixzz0JIgnV2c5&D

  • ifthethunderdontgetya™³²®©

    .
    When government officials come to visit, they enter a different space and are generally asked to prove themselves. Questions fly fast.
    .
    Were those questions about Iran, or GOP babble points? I couldn’t tell the difference.
    .
    But congratulations for feeling good about recycling neocon rubbish: Where are the flying unicorns?!!!
    ~

  • stuartzechman

    Here’s a better translation of this presser than Michael Scherer’s.

  • pintortwo

    And the press corps, which has been deferential through repeated prime-time pressers in the East Room, began to assert itself as never before in his tenure.
    .
    That reminded me of another time when the press, in their opinion, began to assert themselves.
    .
    http://www.salon.com/opinion/greenwald/2008/05/28/gibson/

  • gysgt213

    “Here’s a better translation of this presser than Michael Scherer’s.”
    .
    Stu-Thanks for saving me time. I was looking for an accurate transcript.

  • Paul-no not that one

    “When NBC’s Chuck Todd asked for the second and third time what consequences Iran would face for violating the human rights of election demonstrators, Obama protested. “I answered. I answered,” the President said, giving no concrete answer at all. “I answered your question, which is that we don’t know how this is going to play out. O.K.?” Obama queried rhetorically, clearly not caring what Todd thought”
    .
    Having just watched this Todd comes off not so much as a jerk than as a dope.
    .
    “Draw a line in the sand Mr President! And then when things change tomorrow, as we know they will in this fluid situation, we can harp about it for the next 4 years”

  • gysgt213

    I wish Todd has asked Obama if he now feels he is black enough. Remember when Mike’s super hero press was obsessed with that question?

  • sacredh

    The press might be just be antsy and eager to engage because for the last eight years they had to deal with Beavis. At the very least, President Obama held his own. Look into Obama’s eyes and you’ll see a challenge. Look into McCain’s or Palin’s eyes and you’ll see the backs of their heads.

  • stuartzechman

    Michael Scherer:
    .
    When government officials come to visit, they enter a different space and are generally asked to prove themselves.
    .
    What country are you talking about?
    .
    Surely not this one.

    James Dale Guckert (born 1957) posed as a conservative columnist under the pseudonym Jeff Gannon and was given credentials as a White House reporter between 2003 and 2005, eventually being employed by the news organization Talon News during the latter part of this period. Gannon first gained national attention during a presidential press conference on January 26, 2005, when he asked United States President George W. Bush a question that some in the press corps considered “so friendly it might have been planted.”[1] Gannon routinely obtained daily passes to White House briefings, attending four Bush press conferences and appearing regularly at White House press briefings. Although he did not qualify for a Congressional press pass, Gannon was given daily passes to White House press briefings “after supplying his real name, date of birth and Social Security number.”[2] Gannon came under public scrutiny for his lack of a journalistic background prior to his work with Talon[3][4] and his involvement with various homosexual escort service websites using the professional name “Bulldog”.

    I really, really hope that you’re being ironic here, Michael Scherer.
    .
    I mean, you don’t actually believe that there’s been an adversarial press corps confronting the Executive on behalf of the American people with a dogged insistence on straight answers (and a contemptuous disregard for high ceremony) , right?

    DAVID GREGORY: I think [Scott McClellan is] wrong. He makes the same kind of argument a lot of people on the left have made. I tried not to be defensive about it. I’ve thought a lot about this over a number of years, and I disagree with that assessment.
    .
    I think the questions were asked. I think we pushed. I think we prodded. I think we challenged the president. I think not only those of us in the White House press corps did that, but others in the rest of the landscape of the media did that.
    .
    If there wasn’t a debate in this country, then maybe the American people should think about, why not? Where was Congress? Where was the House? Where was the Senate? Where was public opinion about the war? What did the former president believe about the prewar intelligence? He agreed that — in fact, Bill Clinton agreed that Saddam had WMD.
    .
    The right questions were asked. I think there’s a lot of critics — and I guess we can count Scott McClellan as one — who thinks that if we did not debate the president, debate the policy in our role as journalists, if we did not stand up and say, “This is bogus,” and “You’re a liar,” and “Why are you doing this?” that we didn’t do our job. And I respectfully disagree. It’s not our role.
    .
    MATTHEWS: OK. Let me go to — let me go to Mike Allen.

    Sometimes I can’t tell where the irony stops, and you begin, Michael Scherer.
    .
    Help us out: on the one hand, “Questions fly fast.“, on the other “the press corps, which has been deferential through repeated prime-time pressers in the East Room“.
    .
    What, is the press corps aware of facing Mecca?
    .
    It can’t be that the location of the presser is the determiner of the quality of serious interrogation by the Fourth Estate of the man granted high authority by the electorate…?
    .
    You’re kidding…you’re not arrogant or disconnected enough to really believe that the White House press corps largely functions as a public interested check on government, do you?
    You’re far, far too objective about your own profession and its failings to be that obtuse…
    .
    …Right, Michael Scherer?

  • apollyon07

    So the point is the media has started to moderate somewhere between Fox’s “Obama is killing the country” and MSNBC’s “Rush Limbaugh is the nation’s most imminent problem”. I’ll believe it when I see it.

  • mycomment

    uh, i’m confused. the presser i watched had president obama laughing in the white house press corpses’ faces. chip reid’s harrangue was shamelessly cribbed from newt/st johnnie/senator huckleberry’s talking points.

    seriously, michael, get over yourself.

  • http://smoothlikeremy.blogspot.com/ sgwhiteinfla

    appollyon
    .
    Have you never watched Joe Scarborough on MSNBC?! You do realize he has a 3 hour show in the morning right?

  • Friar Tuck

    Obama faces down a roomful of Roland Headley. What’s the point?

  • Mr. Nice Guy

    F’ck it: I’m calling BS. Unmitigated, festering, steaming, maggot-encrusted BS. You guys practically fawned all over Bush – what’s the word I want, obsequious? – when he sold this country a sh!tty bill of goods called the Iraqi War. That is, when you weren’t performing pom-pom routines in support. Where were you pukes when it was revealed that his regime spied on Americans without warrants? Pisz off, Sherer.

  • sacredh

    Mr. Nice Guy: The word isn’t obsequious, it’s mancrush. Remember the flight suit?

  • ifthethunderdontgetya™³²®©

    .
    sacredh Says:
    Tuesday, June 23, 2009 at 8:20 pm

    The press might be just be antsy and eager to engage because for the last eight years they had to deal with Beavis.
    .
    The last eight years they licked Beavis’ behind and help sell his lies. And they liked it.
    .
    If they wanted to do their jobs, they’d have asked Obama why he is continuing failed Bush policies:
    .
    As Herbert says: “Policies that were wrong under George W. Bush are no less wrong because Barack Obama is in the White House.”
    ~

  • Paul-no not that one

    “If they wanted to do their jobs, they’d have asked Obama why he is continuing failed Bush policies”
    .
    The beltway media frame a question from a “left” perspective? Unpossible!

  • http://phd9.blogspot.com Paul Dirks

    What’s mare ironic is that Tapper in particular doesn’t seem to even care about the contents of his questions xcept for their potential to cause embarassment. One day he’s wondering why Obama keeps invoking state-secret privelege the next day he’s wondering why we’re not calling in air strikes in support of the Iranian demonstrators.

  • stuartzechman

    Perhaps, when he wrote “Questions fly fast.“, Michael Scherer was referring to this one brave, intelligent voice that provided a model for what important adversarial questions would sound like coming from a functioning press corps.
    .
    Unfortunately for the country, pompous, privileged jackasses are content to toss the stupid opposition’s vapid talking points at a reasonably bright, eloquent and prepared politician.

  • choska

    @Paul is right on that. How about asking Obama why he has betrayed everyone who support giving homosexuals the right to marry and openly enlist in the armed services.
    .
    Asked another way, why does he favor having two classes of people in the US? Homosexuals pay taxes like everyone else.
    .
    Asked another way, if it is okay for the US to discriminate against homosexual, why is it wrong for the Iranians to subjugate women?
    .
    But, yeah, the White House would never “frame” a question from the left. Everyone but Joe Klein seems intent on framing questions on behalf of John McCain.
    .
    BTW, Joe, watch your back. You saw what the WaPo did to their independent thinker, Dan Froomkin. I can’t imagine that your bosses at Time are too happy with you right now.

  • Cliff

    I agree with what pretty much everyone else is saying, but this:
    .
    Thomas, who has asked questions of every President since John F. Kennedy, then interrupted him, asking him why he would not release disturbing images of U.S. military abuse of detainees. “Hold on a second, Helen. That’s a different question,” the President responded, though he never took the time to answer it.
    .
    is a fair point.
    .
    Thank you, Helen Thomas, for having the balls to ask that.

  • jcapan

    “Chances are, he won’t be back in that enemy territory for a long time to come.”
    ~
    Enemy territory–MS, seriously man, tell me that’s self satire? Tell me it’s true, cuz it’s either that or you are Mark Halperin’s personal gimp. Sorry if that sounds personal, but who knows, for you, maybe that’s a compliment.
    ~
    Choska mentions gay rights, but we could add health care, civil liberties etc. Obama should be engaged–see, it’s like the media’s respons. to hold him accountable for his waffling or broken promises. A truly adversarial press corps is essential to a functioning democracy (and its continued absence is a key reason for our present dysfunction).
    ~
    You’re the enemy, of whom, in what Spiderman underoos fantasy? Do you live in a b&w film where cigar smoking newsmen and women speak in staccato voices?
    ~
    You’re the enemy all right, of the people: “pompous, privileged jackasses are content to toss the stupid opposition’s vapid talking points at a reasonably bright, eloquent and prepared politician.”

  • http://phd9.blogspot.com Paul Dirks

    then interrupted him, asking him why he would not release disturbing images of U.S. military abuse of detainees
    .
    Oddly, her question wasn’t included in the NYT transcript of the event. They call it (crosstalk)……

  • kristiia

    Ha – of course, the story is all about the press, not healthcare or Iran, not POTUS’ response to Republican critics or Energy legislation being voted on in the House on Friday.

    The story is “homefield advantage” and asking “follow up” questions.

    This is the crap Obama disdains, along with the 24 hour news cycle.

    Obama looked and sounded great during the press conference.

    He made some good points about Healthcare that I haven’t noticed the press pick up on re the issue of employers dropping their health insurance plans for a public option – i.e. that there is no guarantee NOW that your employer is going to keep your existing health insurance. They may drop it because of the increasing cost and/or switch to a cheaper one with less coverage. My family has had that happen multiple times in the past couple of years. Most people’s existing health insurance is certainly not guaranteed to stay the same through their place of employment whether or not the government passes ANYTHING. This is a very real prospect for a lot of people who are happy right now with their health insurance.

    I generally like the inside game articles you write, Michael, but, right now, there is just too much going on and too much crap being spewed by Republicans on Iran and Healthcare to care about this stuff.

  • http://smoothlikeremy.blogspot.com/ sgwhiteinfla

    Paul Dirks
    .
    I watched the exchange several times and you couldn’t hear exactly what she said other than the word pictures. Also there were a lot of typos in the NYTimes transcript so it was imperfect in several places.

  • jcapan

    And, yes, thank you Helen Thomas. Perhaps when MS is 88 he’ll see through all the bs and give a sh!t:
    ~
    http://www.timesunion.com/AspStories/story.asp?storyID=812557&category=COMMENTARY

  • slaneyblack

    And the press corps, which has been deferential through repeated prime-time pressers in the East Room, began to assert itself as never before in his tenure.
    .
    How come when you guys “assert yourself” it’s about him not being foolishly hawkish in the middle east and not step and fetching for corporate interests? I.e. for not being Bush?

  • yutsano

    I now have a new definition of dreck. Thanks MS!

  • stuartzechman

    Thank God that the country has the Washington Post to give us important political reporting emblematic of founders’ vision of the Fourth Estate in a nation of the free.
    .
    (warning for the nausea-prone: do NOT click on the link until at least 1 hour after eating)

  • palmerstoat

    Wow, those intrepid journalists asking the tough questions without fear or favor. Where would we be without them? Oh wait…

  • yutsano

    Wow, those intrepid journalists asking the tough questions without fear or favor. Where would we be without them? Oh wait…
    -
    Did you just subtly compare the White House Press Corps with the Royal Canadian Mounted Police?

  • gwbc

    You know, I can go to any gin joint anywhere in the world and hear more meaningful discussions of policies than I heard from the goons who were asking the questions.
    You are a bunch of entertainers, and not very good ones, playing gotcha and scoring points with your buddies. Your soundbites do not make the president look bad, you make yourselves look ridicuous. Special Dickhead awards to Jake Tapper and Chuck Todd. By the way, have any of you reported that the President is up to 60% approval again in the Gallup daily tracking poll. ? Of course not,.

  • stuartzechman

    In old days men had the rack. Now they have the press. That is an improvement certainly. But still it is very bad, and wrong, and demoralizing.
    .
    ^ Wilde, Oscar, “The Soul of Man”

  • donovong

    In the “press conference” I saw, Obama managed to hand at least 3 of you idiots your a$$es and you are too stupid to realize what happened. Todd, Tapper and – of course, Major P.I.T.A. – were verbally slapped silly.

    I have no doubt that you would have been included in that number, had you been given the opportunity to ask one of your oh-so-serious questions.

  • jcapan

    “A petty reason perhaps why novelists more and more try to keep a distance from journalists is that novelists are trying to write the truth and journalists are trying to write fiction.”
    ~
    Graham Greene

  • http://bradysbeef.com idaho beef

    tough days for the press corps. what a shame the white house staff really won’t answer the questions that the american people want to hear about.

  • jcapan

    mo hitotsu: “The corporate grip on opinion in the United States is one of the wonders of the Western world. No First World country has ever managed to eliminate so entirely from its media all objectivity – much less dissent.”
    ~
    Gore Vidal

  • choska

    Not that it matters, but I bring up gay rights for a reason. Though I’m definitely not gay, I have a three young children of my own and more nieces and nephews that I can count. I can’t swing a dead cat without hitting one of my children’s friends running around my house.
    .
    And it is those kids who have me so worked up about gay rights. Odds are one of the scores of kids I know will be gay. And it is an absolute outrage that they aren’t entitled to the same basic civil rights as heterosexuals in this country.
    .
    Obama has turned out to be a huge disappointment. 50 million people didn’t have health care when he entered; more won’t have it when he leaves. Gay people had no rights when he entered; nothing will have changed when he leaves. Those kids I spoke of will face a future with a hugely degraded environment and a massively out of balance debt. They will also be stuck with a massively corrupt government that is owned by corporations.
    .
    No one represents the citizens of the US. Congress – from Harry Reid all the way to Nancy Pelosi – represents corporations. The greatest story in the world – the complete betrayal of the 60 million people who voted for Obama – is unfolding in front of them. Yet all of the media wanted to ask about was Iran.
    .
    It is too bad that Washington DC is more concerned with what happens to people in Iran than what happens to people in the US. We thought we were voting for change. To paraphrase the Kundera, what we are getting is simply capitalism with a human face.
    .
    The votes of the millions of people who voted for Obama counted about as much as the people who voted in Iran. The only votes that count are those of the elites in Tehran and Washington DC and New York. The rest of us are just pawns to be manipulated and, sometimes, sent off to die in Iraq, Vietnam, etc.
    .
    One day all of the children I see everyday will grow up. Some of them will be sent off to die in some war that the elites in DC decree as absolutely necessary. The gay kids won’t be able to marry. None of those kids will be able to afford health insurance. All of those kids will live in a climate that has fallen apart. And the media will continue to ask pointless questions about what the President thinks about any country but his own.

  • egilsson1

    I haven’t read this “blog” for a while, and I see that Scherer is still a douchebag. I should say, “laughable douchebag” for the sake of completeness.

    What an unlovey combination of self-centered spin and shallow gotcha-mongering he is. However, as between Major Garrett, Chip Reid (or was that Tapper with the dumb fear and timidity question?) and, sadly, Chuck Todd, I’m not sure who came across as more juvenile.

    Actually, I thought Reid (Tapper) won hands down, but Major Garrett was pretty stupid too.

  • egilsson1

    And Scherer’s “summary” is flat wrong too:

    [i]Jackson was not the only reporter the President cut off. When NBC’s Chuck Todd asked for the second and third time what consequences Iran would face for violating the human rights of election demonstrators, Obama protested. “I answered. I answered,” the President said, giving no concrete answer at all. “I answered your question, which is that we don’t know how this is going to play out. O.K.?” Obama queried rhetorically, clearly not caring what Todd thought.[/i]

    Obama clearly did answer Todd’s question – just not what Todd wanted. “We don’t know how this is going to play out” is an absolutely valid answer, because it’s beyond retarded to suggest a recipe of “consequences” to Iran at this stage – which would also have the effect of the defeating everything Obama is trying to do.

    Christ, these guys are like junior high-schoolers with their petty BS.

  • jcapan

    “I can’t swing a dead cat without hitting one of my children’s friends running around my house.”
    ~
    OK, I’m straight stealing that line!

  • Mr. Nice Guy

    idaho beef: exactly what were you looking for that you didn’t see?

  • Mr. Nice Guy

    egilsson1: see, it’s like this. The news hounds need something “concrete” – like a wall – so they can take pot shots from one side or the other. These vague, but valid answers don’t leave them the edge they need to hide behind. In my line of work – technology – I very often have to tell people, “I won’t know for sure until I get more information.” That’s the way it is. If I had a crystal ball to give me all the answers, I wouldn’t be working: I’d find out the next winning Mega Lottery numbers and buy a ticket.

    In short, the world is not always black-and-white. Don’t our intrepid reporters have a grasp of this fundamental truth, or are they spoiled brats who expect – nay, demand – everything served up at their leisure? Yeah, I know – silly question…

  • choska

    Feel free, with my compliments.

  • juniusredivivus

    Choska, isn’t it a tiny bit early to start panicking? Obama hasn’t been in office for even six months, and you’ve decided that all is lost. The guy inherited two expensive wars, a huge deficit, a badly damaged national reputation and a Congress and Senate filled with corporate salary critters. Did you really think he could do everything all at once? Give him time. If we don’t see progress in say 18 months, then it’s reasonable to start the denunciations. Until then, patience, please.

  • pafro

    Remember that time Cokie Roberts said that Obama was un-American and elitist because he went to freaksville (aka Hawaii) and saw his dying grandmother?

    The press corps sure goes easy on that guy who they can’t say for sure has an American birth certificate.

  • James, Los Angeles

    I thought it was a pretty good presser. I don’t take issue with the questions that were asked, or with the tone of them, unlike my fellow raving commie pinko socialist leftwing moonbats. We always know that Chip is going to bring a big list of Republican talking points, but it gives the President a good chance to answer the criticism, which he did very very well, thank you. Chuckie Todd showed himself to be a dumbass, but we knew that, yes? Only because he distinguished himself by once again asking the silliest, most inane question of the day. (But where was Ed “My Job Is To Make News” Henry?)
    .
    Scherer’s right about the preening television talkers, but Obama outmaneuvers them at every turn, graciously answering their inane and irrelevant questions at length.
    .
    What I don’t get is this whining about who gets a question, who gets called on. *That* we didn’t see during the bushies. Publicly crying and whining when somebody else gets a turn, like three-year-olds on a merry-go-round. These jackass journos do it every presser. There’s no crying in journalism, boys!Whiners! Whining and complaining! Whining, preening jackasses. Nico Pitney has outshone every journo in Washington with his Iraq coverage, and why shouldn’t he get a question?
    .
    Compare and contrast: Nico Pitney’s coverage of Iran, or this:

    .
    Heh heh. ‘Nuf said.

  • choska

    Perhaps. But on his current course and speed he is heading for the rocks. The real problem isn’t Obama. The problem is that Washington DC is a company town, and that company is controlled by people like Max Baucus, John McCain, and Tom Daschle who have zero incentive to do anything that upsets the status quo.
    .
    What kills me about today’s press conference and Scherer’s review of same, is that they are COMPLETELY missing the story of their lives. We are watching the most significant US President since FDR get taken down by his own team.
    .
    Forget Limbaugh and McCain. They are powerless. The most amazing story is how the institutional Democrats are still at war with Obama. And while Obama is bending over backwards to accommodate them he is going to lose his own base.
    .
    He is in danger of looking up on the second Wednesday of November 2010 and realizing that his entire presidency will amount to exactly nothing. That, in the end, he may have won the battle in 2008, but the institutional Democrats led by Reid, Schumer, Bill Clinton, and Joe Lieberman won the war.
    .
    The reason the Republican Party isn’t dead is because the Democrats won’t allow them to die. Ultimately the Democrats will break enough promises to Gays, Blacks, Hispanics, Environmentalists, the Union members, and the urbanites on the coasts that those groups will just stop voting. Why vote for anyone when your choices are Republicans and Republican-lite.
    .
    So, yes, it is still early. But it isn’t that early. Once September rolls around and Congress starts gearing up for 2010 then the odds of them doing anything constructive will drop from .01% to absolute zero. Summer recess starts on August 9th. That gives Obama 6 weeks to turn things around.
    .
    Whatever remains after that on gay rights, the environment, health care, or education will not be accomplished. For the remaining 3.5 to 7.5 years he’ll be nothing more than a paper pusher who, perhaps, might be able to temper the worst foreign policy instincts of John McCain and Charles Krauthammer.

  • choska

    Like I said in my earlier post. The White House, Congress, and the media are DEEPLY concerned about Iran. Too bad they could not possibly care less about the United States.

  • awb75

    if there was the 24/7 cable and internet beast in the 30′s we wouldn’t have Social Security
    if there was the 24/7 cable and internet beast in the 60′s we wouldn’t have Medicare

    I think President Obama gets a kick out of people consistently under estimating him

    Just ask Sec’y Clinton

    By the time his first term ends we will have ended DADT and DOMA and we will have a health care and climate major bills – maybe not everything – but they can be amended

    This guy didn’t become the first african american President at 47 because he wasn’t up to the challenge

  • juniusredivivus

    Choska, you do seem set on becoming the prophet of doom. Depressed? Or simply getting a thrill out of being the first to proclaim that the end is nigh?

  • apollyon07

    sg: MSNBC sucks.

  • poh123

    “A petty reason perhaps why novelists more and more try to keep a distance from journalists is that novelists are trying to write the truth and journalists are trying to write fiction.”
    jcapan…thank you. Brilliant.

    I hadn’t written for a long time in this blog, but again, the press is appalling and I can’t keep quiet. I will begin by restating that I am from another country that was once occupied and invaded by the United States. It is PATHETIC when the press pushes and questions the president of the United States on when he will condemn and warn another country about consequences for its actions. Consequences that translate to punishment, of course, by the United States government, ALONE. The press is irresponsible and pathetic…what do you expect for the U.S. to do? To threaten Iran? It can’t, it shouldn’t and I hope it won’t because if you threaten you must follow up on that threat. This is an Iranian issue and other countries should not mettle. This is so obvious that I don’t understand how the press doesn’t see this. Bigger powerful countries should only mettle when those victimized plead and ask for help from the international community, as it happened in Rwanda and many other countries. As it happens in Darfur today. But Iranians are not asking the international community for help and they won’t either.

    I wasn’t too sure about Mr. Obama during the primaries. Thought he was a fake. Turns out he is real and I hope he sticks to his principles. It is hard with the corrupt press. Yes corrupt. The press core will do anything, anything to get a sound bite, a headline, a lead in statement. You play a dangerous game with people’s lives all over the world. I wonder if you realize this.

    Shame on you.

  • Rorschach

    I thought Obama dominated, but I guess I’m just a viewer..

  • cfukara

    AS THE FREE WORLD TURNS

    ……. in the free world, the freedom of free protesters is curtailed
    31 people arrested Tuesday (June 23, 2009) as they protested .. in southern West Virginia, USA.

    http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090624/ap_on_en_mo/us_mine_protest

    .

    ……. and appalled universal leaders of the free world pontificate
    http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/23/us/politics/23text-obama.html?_r=3&pagewanted=print
    The .. people have a universal right to assembly and free speech. … the international community have been appalled and outraged by the threats .. and imprisonments of the last few days. I strongly condemn these unjust actions … powerful images and poignant words have made their way to us … and so we have watched what the (protesters) are doing. And we deplore violence against innocent civilians anywhere that it takes place. .. it’s important for us to make sure that we let the … people know that we are watching what’s happening, that they are not alone in this process. .. And, you know, we’ve all been struck by the courage of people. … We have to believe that ultimately justice will prevail.

    .

    ……. meanwhile, free pundits of the free world bay for mayhem – insurrection and more bloodshed
    http://news.yahoo.com/s/time/20090624/wl_time/08599190669600/print
    .. the regime has used only a fraction of its capacity for violent suppression, and its security forces show no sign of wavering or splintering. The authorities have warned that defiance of bans on demonstration will no longer be tolerated .. While urging continued defiance and planning further rallies … (protest) leaders have not yet given their followers clear marching orders. The challenge .. is to evolve a strategy to sustain a political challenge over weeks, months, and even years in the face of a violent crackdown on street demonstrations. ..

    (To be continued)

  • middlegirl

    Unbelievable, Michael. The press got owned at that news conference. Grandstanding, trivia obsessed, whiny media, that’s what the rest of us see. Time to step out of your media bubble (Argentina is nice) and read what real people are saying. The press made Obama look even more presidential. The smaller they are, the bigger he looks. Tough questions? In your delusional mind only.

  • Art Pepper

    Chances are, he won’t be back in that enemy territory for a long time to come.
    .
    Yeah, keep telling yourself that. You guys are the Woodward and Bernstein of your generation. /snark

  • poh123

    middlegirl:
    “The smaller they are, the bigger he looks. Tough questions? In your delusional mind only.”

    Bravo! Bravo!

blog comments powered by Disqus