Sotomayor Gets a Hearing

Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Patrick Leahy just announced on the Senate floor that Obama’s nominee for the Supreme Court Sonia Sotomayor will receive her confirmation hearing before his committee on July 13.”It’s in line with past experience,” Leahy said. “There’s no reason to delay this well qualified nominee. She deserves an oppertunity to go before the public and speak of her record especially given those who would mischaracterize her record.”

The date is much earlier than what the G.O.P. had hoped for. Senator Jeff Sessions, the top Republican on the committee, had pushed to confirm her after the August recess in September given her long judicial record. There’s sure to be some outrage, though the schedule is inline with the confimation of Chief Justice John Roberts — as Leahy pointed out on the Senate floor. Republicans had originally called for a Roberts-like schedule before they realized that he was confirmed in just 74 days. They then revised their call for an Alito-like time frame — Justice Samuel Alito took more than 90 days from nomination to confirmation. Oops.

Update:
Leahy lays out the schedule in his statement, which they just passed out to reporters on the Hill. Looks like he anticipates two weeks of hearings followed by a vote the first week of August before they recess for they summer: “My initial proposal to Senator Sessions was that we begin the hearing on July 7, following the Senate’s return from July 4 recess. I have deferred the start date to July 13 in an effort to accomodate our Republican members. With bipartisan cooperation, we should still be able to complete Judiciary Committee consideration of the nomination during the last week of July, and allow the Senate to consider the nomination during the first week in August, before the Senate recesses on August 7.”

Subscribe to Jay Newton-Small on Facebook
Related Topics: Uncategorized
  • Latest on Swampland

    Jim Bourg / Reuters

    At CPAC, Romney Stresses Conservative Credentials

    Three days after a trifecta of losses underlined lingering questions about his ability to win over the Republican Party’s base, Mitt Romney arrived at CPAC to allay skeptics’ fears. Throughout his second bid for the GOP nomination, Romney has made his business bona fides the centerpiece of his candidacy. But on Friday, before a packed room at the annual conservative confab, he sought to emphasize the record he compiled in Massachusetts. “I was a severely conservative governor,” he told the crowd. “I know conservatism, because I have lived conservatism.” 

    Romney: I Was A 'Severely Conservative' GovernorHuffPost Politics

    Pablo Martinez Monsivais / AP

    Mired in the Sticky Politics of Health and Faith, Obama Shifts on Contraception

    In the face of mounting pressure from Catholic leaders and politicians, the White House on Friday tweaked its position on contraception coverage mandates in the Affordable Care Act. Rather than require large religious institutions like Catholic colleges and hospitals to provide employees with free health insurance coverage for contraception, insurance companies themselves will have to pick up the tab.

  • spob

    Of course, JNS, Leahy’s citation of “precedent” is always an interesting thing. Remember his comment about a well-qualified rating from ABA being the “gold standard”, something which Leahy abandoned with GOP nominees and for which the MSM gave him cover. Perhaps, just perhaps, that personal history of Leahy could make its way into your coverage of the Sotomayor nomination. You can snark at Sessions with your “oops”. But there are lots of opportunities to snark at Dems, which you’ve avoided. I guess you missed Reid’s comment about not having read any of Sotomayor’s opinions before deeming her “qualified”. Funny how that didn’t make its way onto your radar screen.

  • kcory

    I just hope that good ol’ Newt doesn’t come up with something else, I mean short of accusing Ms. Sotomayor of faking her broken ankle.

    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/andy-borowitz/gingrich-accuses-sotomayo_b_212749.html

  • http://phd9.blogspot.com Paul Dirks

    Always amazing how people start with the results they want and then assemble a bunch of enduring principles to back up their rather temporary preferences.
    .
    Man likes to think of himself as a rational animal. However, it is more true that man is a rationalizing animal, …

  • bitterpill8

    This will give the judge time to meet senators and the timing seems reasonable. Next: playing to the tv camera at the hearings; and delivering portentous talking points. On the sidelines: hypocrisy in full flow.

  • shepherdwong

    “There’s sure to be some outrage…”
    .
    Must be Tuesday.

  • kattest123

    I just checked intrade, and shares in “Jay Newton Small will reveal that SS was a member of a group that gave an award to someone who’d proposed genocide” are currently trading at 0.00001 Zimbabwe dollars.

  • gysgt213

    Is Joe in Pakistan?
    .
    LARGE BLAST REPORTED AT PAKISTAN HOTEL USED BY FOREIGN MEDIA, TOURISTS

  • FlownOver

    Count on Republican senators, their enablers and others similarly disposed to try to shift the argument again. Having given virtually no attention to the merits, and having made insufficient headway on their cartoonish character assassination, they’ll now try to make this a subjective and selective brouhaha about the process. One more opportunity for the MSM to swallow the new phony meme, and I’m betting they’ll take it. Who needs light when there’s heat?

  • tantef

    I second Gunny’s question at #7.

  • Rorschach

    @kcory: That’s satire, if you were being serious.

  • cfukara

    ” .. given her long judicial record.
    An admirable long record is bad.
    The mediocre shall thrive and inherit the USA.
    Are we selectively breeding a nation of the mediocre?
    [Yes. That is OK, right? Now and then when the need arises, we shall ship in a few of the good ones from India on HB1 visa.]

    [You have to admire this American's tenacity. Too bad that she thereby competes with men on equal terms. That makes Newt mad. Insecure. And that goes for Hannitty. And Limbaugh.]

  • cfukara

    gysgt213: Is Joe in Pakistan?

    He might have gone to NKorea, masquerading as an undercover female journalist.

  • Matt

    This timeline is nearly identical to those of the GOP’s beloved kooks Roberts and Alito. Nothing to whine about, but I’m sure they’ll cook something up…

    http://www.political-buzz.com/

  • ilikechips

    off topic..but a gem. and is why people have no faith in the media being objective.

    http://newsbusters.org/blogs/warner-todd-huston/2009/06/09/comparison-economic-reporting-under-bush-under-obama

  • spob

    And of course, FO was outraged about the character assassination of Alito . . . .

  • cfukara

    ” .. short of accusing Ms. Sotomayor of faking her broken ankle. ..”
    Sonia should no expect sympathy from Republicans. Maybe they will congratulate her instead: Remember that among the GOP members there are many who seem to love and promote “torture” [but only when it is inflicted on others – as amply demonstrated by brave Hanitty’s dread of torture by ‘waterboarding’.

  • spob

    yeah, cfukara, GOP sens should be in love with a judge who thinks that states cannot disenfranchise prison inmates, for Pete’s sake.

  • trustronan

    The word “oppertunity” is misspelled in the Leahy quotation above. It’s been driving me nuts all day!

  • spob

    http://planetgore.nationalreview.com/post/?q=MjY4NjJhNTFlNmE1NDI1OGM5Yzg5ODA2NDFiZTM3ZTk=
    .
    Gotta love the heavy hand of government. I wonder who Sotomayor would back . . . .

  • cfukara

    trustronan: ” .. It’s been driving me nuts all day!”
    Pipe Down, kid.
    Count your blessings.
    At least you didn’t spend your day in Northern Pakistan dodging democracy drones and scanning the horizon for assorted killer squads determined to snuff out your dear life and that of your loved ones – remotely – like it is a video game.

blog comments powered by Disqus