Obama’s Cybersecurity Speech: Why Bother?

From TIME national security/intel correspondent Bobby Ghosh

It was a case of cyber-hooey and cyber… who? After a 60-day review of the nation’s cybersecurity policies, followed by a six-week turf war over which department should guard the nation in cyberspace, President Obama’s speech today was disappointingly long on generalities by short on specifics. Revealing Washington’s worst-kept secret, the President announced that he was creating the position of a “Cybersecurity Coordinator” in the White House. But he didn’t name his choice for the job, and didn’t offer a timeline on when a choice would be made.

It’s been known for months that Obama would appoint a cyberczar; speculation in recent weeks has centered on Melissa Hathaway, who conducted the 60-day review and was President Bush’s go-to person on cyberstuff. Obama acknowledged her work, but went no further. Much of Obama’s speech was taken up in stating the obvious: that cybersecurity is vitally important, that responsibility is currently distribute diffusely across too many government departments, that there needs to be better government-business collaboration. But it’s unclear how the new cyberczar will help cut through the bureaucracy when they will themselves be answering to two masters: the National Security Council and the National Economic Council. Obama promised his pick would have “regular access to me,” but the fact that the czar won’t report directly to the President will greatly undermine their ability to do battle with the DHS, the NSA and any number of other departments that have a finger in the cyberpie.

It’s worth remembering here that the Bush administration had a cyberczar, too: Silicon Valley entrepreneur Rod Beckstrom. But Beckstrom quit as Director of the National Cybersecurity Center in March, citing interdepartmental politics. Meantime, Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D-West Virginia) and Sen. Olympia Snowe (R-Maine) have introduced legislation to create a national cybersecurity adviser who WOULD report directly to the President.

What we need here is some cyberclarity.

Related Topics: Uncategorized
  • Latest on Swampland

    Image: Mark Halperin interviews Mitt Romney

    Romney Defends Bain Record, Hits Obama on Economy: ‘He Just Doesn’t Have a Clue’

    Mitt Romney lashed President Obama’s economic stewardship in an interview with TIME’s Mark Halperin on Wednesday, deflecting attacks on his years as a private equity executive and laying out how he hopes to take control of the economy as soon as he’s sworn in, should he defeat Obama in November.

    Lewis Eisenberg, Major Romney Donor, Accuses Obama Of Demonizing Wall StreetHuffPost Politics

    Image: Presidential candidate Mitt Romney

    Mother of Mitt: How Lenore Romney’s Failed Campaign Shaped the Presumptive Republican Nominee

    This week’s TIME cover story, “The Mother of the Mitt Campaign,” tells the tale of how Lenore Romney’s 1970 run for U.S. Senate may have made a bigger impression on the Republican presidential candidate than his years spent as the son of a governor. Mitt’s father lost his own presidential bid, but it was the lessons from his mother’s loss that are more instructive as Romney enters the campaign stretch.

  • http://phd9.blogspot.com Paul Dirks

    Can we speculate that something came up during the vetting process of Obama’s pick and rather than cancel the speech, he decided to proceed with what he had so far?
    .
    Of course I’ll be satified with the current level of cybersecurity if it simply assures us that the White House won’t be routinely losing official e-mails.

  • Emil

    “From TIME naitonal security” Naitonal?? Geez, people.

  • Cliff

    What we need here is some cyberclarity.
    .
    Ghosh, that’s clever.

  • rubypanther

    As a programmer and systems administrator I can say I am happy he didn’t offer more specifics at this point.
    .
    These are important issues, and I’d rather him take his time, focus on the more immediate issues of jobs, health care and war. Computer security needs an overhaul, but it’s not immediate and rushing it would not fix the problems. Rushed, half-assed approaches to these problems that tried to just throw some money at some “experts” is why we have the security problems we have. Systemic change needs to be thoughtful.

  • http://securitydebrief.adfero.com/obamas-cybersecurity-speech-why-bother/ Obama’s Cybersecurity Speech: Why Bother? | Security Debrief – a blog of homeland security news and analysis

    [...] Obama’s Cybersecurity Speech: Why Bother? – Swampland – TIME.com It was a case of cyber-hooey and cyber… who? After a 60-day review of the nation’s cybersecurity policies, followed by a six-week turf war over which department should guard the nation in cyberspace, President Obama’s speech today was disappointingly long on generalities by short on specifics. var addthis_pub = "";Print this article [...]

  • http://securitydebrief.adfero.com/obamas-cybersecurity-speech-why-bother/ Obama’s Cybersecurity Speech: Why Bother? | Security Debrief – a blog of homeland security news and analysis

    [...] Obama’s Cybersecurity Speech: Why Bother? – Swampland – TIME.com It was a case of cyber-hooey and cyber… who? After a 60-day review of the nation’s cybersecurity policies, followed by a six-week turf war over which department should guard the nation in cyberspace, President Obama’s speech today was disappointingly long on generalities by short on specifics. var addthis_pub = "";Print this article [...]

  • http://leonardomusumeci.net/2009/06/01/obamas-cybersecurity-speechil-discorso-di-obama-sulla-sicurezza-cibernetica/ Leonardo Musumeci » Blog Archive » Il discorso di Obama sulla sicurezza cibernetica

    [...] ho già detto, tutti  meritano di essere letti. E qui ci sono ancora ulteriori [...]

  • http://ubiwar.com/2009/06/02/infobore-ii/ InfoBore II « ubiwar . conflict in n dimensions

    [...] Obama’s Cybersecurity Speech: Why Bother? – Bobby Ghosh, Time [...]

blog comments powered by Disqus