Obama’s Message Wednesday Night

For most of the last 100 days, President Obama has fended off criticism that he is trying to do too much at once. He had no choice, he would counter. “We cannot successfully address any of our problems without addressing them all,” he famously said in a radio address on February 21.

But on Wednesday, in his third primetime press conference, Obama moved beyond the defense of his actions to a confession of sorts. Doing so much at once, it turns out, is actually quite a chore. “The typical president, I think, has two or three big problems,” he said, just hours after a flu pandemic was declared “imminent” by the World Health Organization. “We’ve got seven or eight big problems.”

He went on. “I don’t want to run auto companies, I don’t want to run banks. I’ve got two wars I’ve got to run already. I’ve got more than enough to do,” he said. “So the sooner we can get out of that business, the better off we’re going to be.”

A few minutes later, in response to another question, Obama returned to the same theme. “If you could tell me right now that, when I walked into this office that the banks were humming,” he said, “that autos were selling, and that all you had to worry about was Iraq, Afghanistan, North Korea, getting health care passed, figuring out how to deal with energy independence, deal with Iran, and a pandemic flu, I would take that deal.”

What to make of all this talk? It was not so much a complaint as an acknowledgment of the historical confluence of crises that have greeted Obama’s first months in the White House. A list of the major issues Obama has faced down would include everything from pirate standoffs in the Indian Ocean to banking conflations in New York, from North Korean missiles to auto industry collapses, from floods in Fargo to swine flu in Mexico. It is the sort of sequence of events that would strain credulity if written in fiction, a sequence made all the more remarkable by the fact that for the early weeks, Obama and his staff were still learning their way around the White House. (According to the New York Times, on one particularly hectic day in the White House, Obama’s top message man, David Axelrod, asked aloud of another aide, “What is this, a ‘West Wing’ episode?”)

But Obama’s point was not to plead for pity or sympathy. It was to prepare the American people for the long road ahead. “I’m humbled,” he said. “By the American people who have shown extraordinary patience and I think a recognition that we’re not going to solve all of these problems overnight.” This was the second time in 60 minutes that he had thanked Americans for their patience.

The country, he was saying, is going to need it.

Related Topics: Uncategorized
  • Latest on Swampland

    Audacity of Dope: Tales of a Toking Teenage Obama

    We knew Barack Obama smoked weed in high school because he wrote about it in his books. What we didn’t know until Buzzfeed posted these choice nuggets (I’m so sorry) from David Maraniss’s new book on the President’s younger years, is the giggle-worthy details of his “Choom Gang” lifestyle, which are right out of a buddy stoner flick. Obama and his friends drove around the lush Hawaii countryside, hot-boxing their VW bus and re-upping with a long-haired pizza-tossing dealer named Ray, who Obama thanked in his yearbook “for all the good times.”

    Lewis Eisenberg, Major Romney Donor, Accuses Obama Of Demonizing Wall StreetHuffPost Politics

    Obama Stumbles? Why the President’s Right to Talk About Bain

    The meme of the day in journo-world is that President Obama has stumbled at the outset of the general election campaign. The evidence for this? Well, uh, there isn’t very much, really–except that a few Democrats have criticized his campaign’s attacks on Mitt Romney’s record at Bain Capital and that Obama’s fundraising is merely humongous, instead of obscenely humongous. The two phenomena are linked, of course: Obama isn’t getting the usual haul from Wall Street because he has outrageously–outrageously!–tried to regulate the bankers who did so much to crash the economy in 2008. The handful of Democrats squawking are people who either (a) get money from private equity firms or (b) have retired and joined Mondo Casino. But there is another side to this story:

  • pelhamite1

    ” . . . . the American people have shown extraordinary patience and I think a recognition that we’re not going to solve all of these problems overnight.” Tell it to Fox News, where one of the growing memes (complete with smacking lips) is “He can’t keep blaming George Bush forever”. NO, he can’t. But he cannot fix a process of deregulation and deindustrialzation that has been 40 years in the making either. I was in Detroit in 1977 and saw that the Motor City was in real trouble and we have done precious little in the 32 years since to get that corner of the Rust Belt going. It is worth remembering that it has been 20 years since “Roger and Me’ was filmed, a whole generation of manufacturing hemhorrage. So I say we give the guy another 100 days before we go crazy with the potshots.

  • Emil

    “This was THE second time in 60 minutes that he had thanked Americans for their patience.”

  • Art Pepper

    Agree with your take on this. Also, he’s trying to counter the notion that intervening in crises = socialism.
    .
    Stephen Hayes on CNN: “However controversial these techniques…” Is “controversial” the new euphemism for “illegal”?
    .
    Ed Rollins was “bored” – Do all Republicans have short attention spans?

  • James, Los Angeles

    You asked the best question of the nite, Scherer, and the only one that didn’t really get a satisfactory answer, in MY very humble opinion. Were you looking for any specific response?

    Question: Thank you, Mr. President. During the campaign, you criticized President Bush’s use of the state secrets privilege, but U.S. attorneys have continued to argue the Bush position in three cases in court. How exactly does your view of state secrets differ from President Bush’s? And do you believe presidents should be able to derail entire lawsuits about warrantless wiretapping or rendition if classified information is involved?

    Well he DID say that he thought it was too “broad.” Part II of your question was, eh, argumentative. Perhaps you’ll follow up with a nice little Friday piece?

  • http://smoothlikeremy.blogspot.com/ sgwhiteinfla

    James LA
    .
    Welcome back man, haven’t seen you in forever.

  • Matt

    Can’t imagine a better presser Obama could have delivered. There is a reason why he won the election and is enjoying such high approval numbers in the midst of crises (most of which are not of his doing, but still).

    http://www.political-buzz.com/

  • http://phd9.blogspot.com Paul Dirks

    I can’t get past the feeling that MS is starting to realize the historical importance of this period and just far off the rails we have come in a way that was NOT apparent during the campaign season.
    .
    Certainly before the Wall Street meltdown and the bailout, everyone seemd to treat certain issues as if they were all just fun and games. I’m liking the change even if it means that Obama has to endure scrutiny that McCain would have been able to avoid by reciting platitudes.

  • cdrwayne

    Michael:

    I agree with James LA. Welcome back to the real world where problems exist and can not be solved by lowering taxes or invading another country.

  • Paul-no not that one

    Just watched the Cspan replay of the press conference. Let me agree with the other commenters, excellent question but not a satisfying answer.
    Well done MS.

  • tantef

    Cspan replay: “Why God Invented Cspan” I am glad I am not the only one who needed to see the presser replayed. You earned your per diem Michael.

  • James, Los Angeles

    Hey sg, good to “see” you too.
    .
    Scherer’s always been good on civil liberties issues. Especially when he perceives the Dems in violation. Remember how incensed he was about the protesters at the Dem convention? He wrote a great piece on that. Not so much at the RNC though. To be fair, that’s no different than anyone else in DC.

  • 53_3

    I thought he was a bit evasive on the torture issue, particularly in not answering whether he favored prosecuting those involved.
    .
    But as an aside to that, on the Cheney memos about it and the stuff in the yet-to-be declassified documents, he was as forceful as he could be in rebutting Cheney’s claims without divulging anything.
    .
    He wrestled a lot, I think, not finding the words “high moral ground” when delivering his reasoning for not torturing.
    .
    These aren’t complaints, just notes, but I thought it was great. It wasn’t intended for anything other than a “working meeting” with the American people anyway.

  • 53_3

    Good to see you, too, James!

  • http://blog.roserant.com/2009/04/30/obamas-message-wednesday-night-time-magazine/ Obama’s Message Wednesday Night (Time Magazine) | Rose’s Rants

    [...] For many of a final 100 days, President Obama has fended off critique which he is perplexing to do as well most during once. He had no choice, he would counter. Continued here: Obama’s Message Wednesday Night (Time Magazine) [...]

  • James, Los Angeles

    hey fifty-three! long time no “see”!
    .
    How about that little Condi Rice:
    "The United States was told, we were told, nothing that violates our obligations under the Convention Against Torture, and so by definition, if it was authorized by the president, it did not violate our obligations under the Convention Against Torture."
    Huh. If the President authorizes it, that means acts that are acknowledged to be torture, when you do it, it’s legal, so sez Condi Rice. Will the press hyperventilate about this, or not?

  • sacredh

    MS: Nice job last night. Feel free to take some office supplies home as a bonus. Maybe a laptop? I really liked the line in your article “It is the sort of sequence of events that would strain credulity if written in fiction”. I agree and there hasn’t been a president in the last generation that I’d rather see dealing with all of this right now. It’s such a relief to realize that what can be done is being done.

  • 53_3

    James LA!
    .
    True. Aint “seen” you since before that rock from space I warned ‘em about hit!
    .
    Try this, for her reply:
    “I didn’t authorize anything. I conveyed the authorization of the administration to the agency, that they had policy authorization, subject to the Justice Department’s clearance. That’s what I did.”
    .
    In other words (Arkele’s, I believe):
    .
    Wasn’ me!

  • 53_3

    Condi pointed upstream

  • sacredh

    Wouldn’t it be worth a chuckle to see Condi on the stand nailin’ the boss? I’ll even supply a banner. “Mission Accomplished”.

  • FlownOver

    Shorter Obama in response to the Scherer question: “We’re figuring out how far we can walk back Bush’s excesses without actually jeopardizing national security. We’ll go as far as we can as soon as we’re sure we know how far that is. Until we’re there we aren’t going to overcompensate just to look good.”
    .
    As someone who has been sickened by the Bush abuses I have no problem with the new guy’s approach.

  • 53_3

    sacredh:
    .
    It depends just in which context you are using the word nailin’. Forgive me, I’m still only on my second cup of coffee and havn’t cleared out all the potential nightmares from my mind.
    .
    Thanks to you, I now have another!
    FO:
    .
    Me neether. I think he might have been trying the Mandela approach, but after having learned that some of our treaties require us to prosecute the perps, I changed my mind. Just the same, I think his approach is about right.

  • 53_3

    sacredh:
    Edward Scissorhands…

  • somepeoplelikeit

    Sacred, did you see Will Ferrell’s “You’re Welcome America”….Condi got nailed alright!!
    .
    That show was pretty funny, anybody catch it?

  • sacredh

    somepeoplelikeit: If that was the HBO special, I have it on the DVR but haven’t had a chance to watch it yet.
    53_3: Condi and Bush bumping uglies? I think I just threw up a little bit in my mouth.

  • sacredh

    somepeoplelikeit: You got the Featured Reader’s Comment on the main Politics page.

  • somepeoplelikeit

    Sacred, you gotta watch it…wait for the moment “Condi” comes out to “I keep forgettin”
    .
    Friggin’ Classic!!

  • sacredh

    Maybe tonight my wife and I will pop some popcorn and watch it. She’s less of a Bush fan than I am. Scary…huh?

  • somepeoplelikeit

    Wow, Sacred! I’ve made it!
    .
    What do I win? A copy of Scherer’s book?
    .
    Oh, wait…

  • sacredh

    Don’t get too exicted. I made it once and got sandwiched inbetween spob and rustyreturns. I think they have a very twisted sense of humor.

  • Ivy_B

    Media Matters collected all the comments from the pundits about how boring the press conferences are. Guess they weren’t watching the same ones I’ve been watching.
    .
    Many of the journos have fussed again that he is doing too much (jake tapper, mark knoller, joe scar, chris cuomo, o knox, the note), but then a little later complain that he isn’t dealing with immigration. They have clearly spent too much time with the Repubs who have no problem holding two contradictory positions at the same time.
    .
    Joining the chorus of congrats and thanks for your question last night Michael.
    .
    Also, nice to see you back James, LA

  • claudius49

    Americans, you have been very fortunate! 1) Because there was someone like Mr Obama running for President, 2) Because the American electorate was clever enough to vote him into the White House.

    Of course, today it is all too early to tell, but perhaps, and hopefully, Future will say: FDR+JFK=BHO.

  • claudius49

    Just one thing more: Mr Zbigniew Brzezinski, quoted in the end of Mr Klein´s article, is absolutely right: “The one thing Obama hasn’t done in the first 100 days,” says Zbigniew Brzezinski, who was Jimmy Carter’s National Security Adviser, “is the big Middle East speech where he says, ‘This is the settlement. This is what we’re for.’ If he doesn’t do that soon, [Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin] Netanyahu is going to set the agenda, not us — and that will be a disaster. If we don’t act now, any chance of a two-state solution will be gone. If he does act now, every government in the world will stand with him.”

    What President Obama also must do is to put some distance between his Administration and AIPAC.

  • James, Los Angeles

    Late to the par-tay but, wow, thanks to all for the welcome back. I’m pretty humbled.

  • http://outtheotherear.wordpress.com/2009/05/01/the-new-litmus-test/ The New Litmus Test « In One Ear… Out the Other

    [...] [...]

blog comments powered by Disqus