Obama’s New Global Vision: It’s Beginning to Happen

UPDATE: I have corrected errors in this post in a followup post here.

There was a promise in the candidacy of Barack Obama, sometimes explicit but more often implicit: The African-American with the funny name and the Kenyan father, the guy who had lived as a child in Indonesia, would be able to remake the global foreign policy conversation. He would move it away from the vision of George W. Bush and John McCain.

Beyond the specific debates about the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, the divide was largely one of perspective. Like Bush, McCain believed in something called “American exceptionalism,” which separated the U.S. from the rest of the world, in moral standing, in military power, in economic might, and in the ability to influence other nations. “We’re the only nation I know in the world that really is deeply concerned about adhering to the principle that all of us are created equal and endowed by our creator with certain rights,” McCain said during the campaign.

Obama came at the issues of foreign policy from an entirely different direction. While he said his first role as president would be to protect and improve the United States, he placed his country in a larger framework of nations, not above the framework. While McCain spoke about U.S. leadership (what “we did for Europe after World War II”), Obama spoke about  collaboration, of a “new era of international cooperation,” of “rebuilding our alliances,” of rejecting “a foreign policy that lectures without listening.” “America is strongest when we act alongside strong partners,” Obama said in a major foreign policy speech last year, in reference to World War II. For McCain, that war showed how America could reshape the world. For Obama, the same conflict showed how America could work with others.

We now know that Obama was not just spinning rhetoric during the campaign. In his first trip to Europe, he is palpably embracing a striking change in the frame of reference for international discussion. Twice on Thursday, Obama was asked to respond to British Prime Minister Gordon Brown’s announcement that the “Washington consensus is over.” Twice, Obama essentially said the comment was not a big deal. The phrase, he said, was a “term of art” to refer to a specific economic approach. He then went on to praise the rise of other nations in relation to historic U.S. power, as evidenced by difficulties at the G20 conference.

There’s been a lot of comparison here about Bretton Woods.  “Oh, well, last time you saw the entire international architecture being remade.”  Well, if there’s just Roosevelt and Churchill sitting in a room with a brandy, that’s a — that’s an easier negotiation.  (Laughter.)  But that’s not the world we live in, and it shouldn’t be the world that we live in. And so that’s not a loss for America; it’s an appreciation that Europe is now rebuilt and a powerhouse.  Japan is rebuilt, is a powerhouse.  China, India — these are all countries on the move.  And that’s good.  That means there are millions of people — billions of people — who are working their way out of poverty.  And over time, that potentially makes this a much more peaceful world.

It is almost impossible to imagine either Bush or McCain making such a claim on a world stage. And other leaders are taking notice. At a Friday morning press conference with Obama, French President Nicolas Sarkozy, a former ideological ally of both McCain and Bush, made a point of referencing this new perspective. “It feels really great to work with an American president who wants to change the world,” Sarkozy said, according to the live English translation of his remarks. He then praised Obama for acknowledging that “the world does not boil down to just American frontiers and borders.”

“And that is hell of a good news for 2009,” Sarkozy concluded.

UPDATE: At a town hall this afternoon in Strasbourg, France, Obama made his campaign pitch to the entire world. “America is changing,” he said, in prepared remarks read off a teleprompter. “But it cannot be America alone that changes.” He also referred to himself by his full name, Barack Hussein Obama, in a Q and A with French and German students. His point was that Al Qaeda is not going to cease to be a problem because someone with such a name gets elected President of The United States.

Related Topics: Uncategorized
  • Latest on Swampland

    Pete Souza / White House

    Obama’s Persuasive Powers on Gay Marriage Manifest in Maryland

    When President Obama endorsed gay marriage earlier this month, the media grappled with two basic political questions: Was his personal “evolution” a case of a politician transparently following a national trend toward accepting same-sex unions (accelerated, perhaps, by his chatty No. 2), and would it hurt his re-election chances by alienating socially conservative voters like black churchgoers? Sure, there was a recognition that it marked a gratifying moment for gay-marriage advocates — as well as some grumbling about the President’s view that it remains a state issue, not a federal one. But by and large, there were few suggestions that one man, even the President, would shift public opinion on the issue or affect public policy. Based on a new Public Policy Polling survey out of Maryland, it seems this possibility was underestimated.

    Lewis Eisenberg, Major Romney Donor, Accuses Obama Of Demonizing Wall StreetHuffPost Politics

    Cherokee Zero

    Apparently, Massachusetts voters don’t mind that Elizabeth Warren foolishly identified herself as a Native American early in her academic career–it was, apparently, a case of family pride and wishful thinking about a Cherokee ancestor. That’s good. Warren may be the best public figure when it comes to explaining the depredations of the financial industry and [...]

  • rustyreturns

    Amy Sullivan was asking for an Obama “catch-phrase”. I like this one to describe Obama’s foreign policy.
    .
    “Assimilation of all countries into a World Socialist government”.
    .
    Everybody sing!!!!
    “[Chorus]
    We are the world
    We are the children
    We are the ones who make a brighter day
    So let’s start giving
    There’s a choice we’re making
    We’re saving our own lives
    It’s true we’ll make a better day
    Just you and me
    .
    Now you know. Obama is a Michael Jackson fan, and his foreign policy is based on the “We Are the People” song.

  • somepeoplelikeit

    During the campaign critics were saying “there’s no way he can do all this!”
    .
    Now they’re saying “I can’t believe he’s doing all this!”
    .
    It’s amazing what you can accomplish by setting bellicosity aside and forming honest partnerships based on trust and respect.
    .
    I like Obama and think he’s great, but he’s just got common sense. Not to be too simplistic, but it really is, the neo-con FoPo is just foolish. “My way or the highway” I’m glad we’ve shown them the highway.
    .
    I do thank you for posting it though Scherer, but not everybody is surprised.

  • gpanfile

    MS… good work. This is exactly it. You address the substance, and utterly ignore spin, perception, and all the rest of the nonsense. Stay on it and we’ll all be fine…

  • jnb987

    Hey rusty, “We Are the World” – not a Michael Jackson song. He helped write it, but it’s technically the charitable single by “USA for Africa”.

    If you’re gonna be derisive, get the facts right.

  • Dee in Columbia MD

    I wrote yesterday about an exchange with a Chinese journalist, who remarked that the President’s response was evident based on the giving of preferential treatment to anglo journalists in the conference. Clearly, this journalist was responding from a frame of reference where America is supreme and that other non-white actors are less than, despite their accomplishments. This is a frame that most African Americans understand and therefore the president was able to recognize the indignity that results from this frame and respond in a manner, that while not directly addressing the statement, paid the extra attention, put in additional effort to make the exchange that much more important and in so doing restored a sense of equality and allowed the journo to retain his dignity.
    .
    This is not something that would have happened with a Bush or McCain presidency and I am confident that in a country like China where dignity is supremely important, the home audience has a perspective of this new President that will bode well in the future.
    .
    Just as I believe that recent grumbling from China about borrowing and global currency and such is a direct result of feeling that despite their accomplishments they were being treated as a second-class country, inferior to white majority countries and not being looked upon as an equal partner on the world stage. Does this exchange strip away all of the perceived slights that have given rise to these perceptions, of course not. However, it does give an example of how the Obama doctrine operating in real time can begin to shape a different perspective.

  • 53_3

    This is yet another area where Obama’s actions are finally starting to shine through the fog of relentless stupidity.
    .
    A party and a president who adapts a policy of making enemies of our oldest and most traditional allies – Europe* – is no real party and no real president.
    .
    I thank my maker every day that the sun finally rose to chase that foul brood of roaches back into the woodwork where they belong.
    .
    Our previous president is known for harfing at dinners, gaffing at public functions, made a fine target for shoes and brickbats, and nothing more.
    .
    To them, good riddance and I’ll see you in Hell.
    .
    Let the real real America shine!

  • Ohg Rea Tone

    President Obama is lifted further in admiration by his wife – the new Princess Diana. …………….

    http://thefiresidepost.com/2009/04/03/michelle-obama-the-new-princess-di/

  • somepeoplelikeit

    Good point Dee, how he handled that press room actually made me proud to be an American and proud I had a part in electing him. There were several reporters that he made laugh, the female Indian reporter comes to mind, and he seemed to own the stage.
    .
    America is definitely back!

  • 53_3

    You know?
    .
    I think that one of the reasons Republicans don’t like Obama is that eveybody likes him and nobody likes them

  • 53_3

    Kind of like a player-hater thing. Sort of.

  • alaskanturkey

    sieze = cease, Michael. Also – “he said, in prepared remarks read off a teleprompter.” If I never hear another word about a teleprompter the rest of my life I will die a happy man.

  • michaelscherer

    thanks turkey. fixed.

  • rose83

    French President Nicholas Sarkozy, a former ideological ally of both McCain and Bush,
    .
    That’s a little unfair to Sarkozy. A French conservative is not the same as an American radical right-winger: He basically endorsed Obama during the GE.
    .
    somepeoplelikeit, I agree that this is mostly just common sense. It’s actually funny how surprised everyone is to see an American President behave rationally!

  • nhautamaki

    Rose: “That’s a little unfair to Sarkozy. A French conservative is not the same as an American radical right-winger: He basically endorsed Obama during the GE.”
    .
    This is true; a conservative outside of America is a liberal in America. A conservative in America is a right-wing fringe politician outside of America, usually regarded as either dangerous or absurd.
    .
    It’s amazing how much Americans have allowed themselves to get so far off center of the world’s political spectrum.

  • sacredh

    I think an unexpected outcome of Obama’s presidency is that by him saying that we want to be a part of the world stage and not it’s ruler, that other nations will again look to us as being the world leader and standard bearer.

  • http://derekg.wordpress.com/ Derek

    The world is happy to have a US president that has command of at least one language.

  • rustyreturns

    Overall, 56% of voters say they at least somewhat approve of the President’s performance so far. Forty-four percent (44%) disapprove. For more data, see Obama By the Numbers and recent demographic highlights. Ratings for Congress are up, but so is the number who say that most members of Congress are corrupt.
    .
    And the French love him. Surprise surprise!
    .
    http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/obama_administration/daily_presidential_tracking_poll

  • http://blogs.wsj.com/capitaljournal/2009/04/03/political-wisdom-obama-diverges-from-american-exceptionalism/ Political Wisdom: Obama Diverges from American Exceptionalism – Capital Journal – WSJ

    [...] Time’s Michael Scherer writes, “Like Bush, McCain believed in something called ‘American exceptionalism,’ which separated the U.S. from the rest of the world, in moral standing, in military power, in economic might, and in the ability to influence other nations…Obama came at the issues of foreign policy from an entirely different direction. While he said his first role as president would be to protect and improve the United States, he placed his country in a larger framework of nations, not above the framework. While McCain spoke about U.S. leadership (what ‘we did for Europe after World War II’), Obama spoke about collaboration, of a ‘new era of international cooperation,’ of ‘rebuilding our alliances,’ of rejecting ‘a foreign policy that lectures without listening.’ ‘America is strongest when we act alongside strong partners,’ Obama said in a major foreign policy speech last year, in reference to World War II. For McCain, that war showed how America could reshape the world. For Obama, the same conflict showed how America could work with others.” [...]

  • 53_3

    For those who don’t know Rusty, see Nate Silver at 538 on Rasmussen:
    http://www.fivethirtyeight.com/2009/03/worst-pollster-in-world-strikes-again.html
    .
    Of course, lets not mention the fact that he hates the French, for some reason.
    .
    Obama was entirely correct when he referred to France as “Our First Ally”.

  • apollyon07

    Wasn’t WWII some of both? America’s individual contribution did directly lead to the fall of the axis powers, I mean it’s a lot less likely that the Nazis would’ve been stopped had America not been involved (nice one, Hirohito). And then with America’s involvement saw a permanently renewed bond between America and Britain, and then the victory led to NATO, etc. Also, WWII led directly to America’s status as a superpower, and eventually the lone one.

    53_3, Obama’s team has made some gaffes so far (the dvds and that reset button) but I guess I’d take those any day over seeing my country’s president try to back rub a world leader and be fiercely rebuked. Giving southern hospitality is alright in the South, NOT in a global setting. Bush never seemed to get that. Man, that was bad.

    And a lot of the reason for Republicans I agree has to do with them feeling bitter about the world’s perception. The player-haters thing also instantly reminded me of that hilarious Chappelle’s Show sketch.

  • http://smoothlikeremy.blogspot.com/ sgwhiteinfla

    53_3
    .
    Just keep letting Republicans hold on to Rasmussen’s polls. Its the only one in the country reflecting those numbers and as long as they keep swearing by them they will keep looking up and wondering why they keep getting their ass kicked in elections.

  • jsfox

    Rusty -

    Just a word of caution. Looking only at Rasmussen for your polling data is a rather larger mistake. One could hardly call them a neutral poll.

    So for balance Research 2000; Favorable: 67% Unfavorable 30% (this poll tends to lean left while Ras leans right)

    Gallup: Favorable 61% Unfavorable 29% (Gallup tends to run neutral) (this job approval)

    Pollster.com aggregate numbers: Favorable: 59.9% unfavorable: 33.3% (again job approval

    Now as far as just Favorable and Unfavorable

    Fox: 62% vs 32%
    Gallup: 69% vs 28%

    Pollster.com aggregate: 61.7% vs 30.7%

    http://pollster.com/

  • 53_3

    apollyon07:
    .
    “And a lot of the reason for Republicans I agree has to do with them feeling bitter about the world’s perception. The player-haters thing also instantly reminded me of that hilarious Chappelle’s Show sketch.”
    .
    You shouldn’t feel bitter about the worlds perception. The footage of the Katrina debacle set the planet on it’s ear.
    .
    It’s kinda like the Rodney King beating, you see. You can’t argue away live coverage with rhetoric, and Republicans have a rather nasty habit of going overboard with it.
    .
    As for WWII, the answer is no. We emerged as the other half of a bipolar world. Neither we nor the Soviet Union wanted to really test each other, so we cannot, other than threoretically, say that we were ‘alone at the top’.
    .
    As for what we did in WWII, don’t forget that one can only ask for so much ‘gratitude’ before it becomes onerous. I’ve never heard any of the European nations express anything other than thanks for what we did then, but we took you thought processes too far when we decided to establish ourselves as their ‘boss’.
    .
    People do not like being lead around by the nose, regardless of favors done, and you guys screwed up this aspect of it big time.

  • pneogy

    ‘Like Bush, McCain believed in something called “American exceptionalism,” …’
    .
    I wish our politicians would take the time to read Matt Miller’s “The Tyranny of Bad Ideas.” If we are to move forward, we need to discard some of our outdated legacy.

  • 53_3

    apollyon07:
    .
    As for Obama’s gaffes?
    .
    There will always be gaffes. They don’t mean a thing, usually.
    .
    I would be a little ruthless if I said GW’s were worse than Obamas, but I don’t see how that could be avoided.
    .
    Even then, though, it’s not really the meat of the issue:
    .
    You have Katrina, Iraq, ‘with us or against us’ as policy, wanton trampling of the Constitution, fomenting of hatred (on tape, even McCain felt it went to far), and an endless list of other indicators that show just how lowsy the Republicans and GWB were during their reign.
    .
    Rove wasn’t nicknamed ‘turdblossom’ for nothing, and lets not get in to the rampant corruption, which many of you GOP types characterize as ‘free enterprise in action’.
    .
    Even Rush Limbaugh supports what the CEOs did! How bad is that.
    .
    In summary, I do not see how a sane American could ever see Republican ideology as viable.

  • apollyon07

    What do you mean by “you guys”? And yeah, America was one of TWO superpowers (with the Soviets, though of course even this eventually changed) who emerged from WWII, what I meant was that WWII had huge ramifications on America’s status in the world from an individual standpoint.

    And I did not say that I personally was bitter about the Republicans perception. I said that I agreed with what you said about it.

  • somepeoplelikeit

    All this WWII talk reminds me of the song “Glory Days”.
    .
    It’s done people. You’ve either learned those lessons and learned they are no longer applicable, or you haven’t.

  • 53_3

    Actually, apollyon07, I did, and I overlooked it. My bad.
    .
    My point is that there is no reason for us to go back to any of the Republican policies. Right now, they are just not appropriate.

  • nhautamaki

    Apollyon: “Wasn’t WWII some of both? America’s individual contribution did directly lead to the fall of the axis powers, I mean it’s a lot less likely that the Nazis would’ve been stopped had America not been involved (nice one, Hirohito). And then with America’s involvement saw a permanently renewed bond between America and Britain, and then the victory led to NATO, etc. Also, WWII led directly to America’s status as a superpower, and eventually the lone one.”
    .
    Not to belittle America’s contribution to the post WW2 world, but even if America had not joined the war effort, the Soviets and Brits would probably have taken care of business. However, Japan would probably not have been forced to unconditionally surrender in that case, and would have been the second superpower to balance Russia, which would probably also have gained an even stronger sphere of influence that would contain Germany, Austria, Greece, and probably even Italy. Tito would have been much easier to control in Yugoslavia as well.
    .
    An isolationist America would also have remained potentially strong of course, but if this theoretical America couldn’t even muster the backbone to join the greatest war in history, what COULD be expected of them?
    .
    The world would be a much, much different world, and probably a much worse one too, but most historians would agree, I think, that the Nazis would not have prevailed even without America’s assistence. Then again, any historian worth his salt is extremely loathe to entertain these kinds of hypotheticals very seriously.

  • dunedweller

    Good observation and reporting MS. I hope your perception and experiences from this trip will stay with you once you’re back in DC – where complete distortions of President Obama’s vision are deemed newsworthy.

  • http://phd9.blogspot.com Paul Dirks

    To me “American exceptionalism” has always been a loaded phrase. We are indeed a beacon to the world as an example of what happens when freedom, self-determination, diversity and adherence to a written framework preserving those values is put in place. But our moral stature comes from our adherence to our values, not simply our identity. When we start to think of our stature as God-given rather than earned through our actions and example, then the potential for great evil is soon to follow.
    .
    Little did I think that I would live to see us approach the brink of the precipice and then step away from it through our own will. We indeed live in interesting times.

  • 53_3

    seconds on that thought, PD!

  • junkmailqueen

    Oh. My. I missed it at the time … did John McCain REALLY say this:
    .
    “We’re the only nation I know in the world that really is deeply concerned about adhering to the principle that all of us are created equal and endowed by our creator with certain rights.”
    .
    Didn’t anyone remind him of, oh, I don’t know, Thomas Hobbes? John Locke (British)? Jean-Jacques Rousseau (French)? The Magna freakin’ Carta???? Poor baby, did he snooze through all those boring, factual (gasp!) history classes in high school?
    .
    That should have disqualified him from the election right there. Holy @@@@@. Wow. Excuse me, I have to jack my jaw up off the floor…

  • textee

    Why has Time magazine failed to post the video of Obama subserviently bowing to the king of Saudia Arabia?

  • http://privcorr.blogspot.com/ wvng

    Good post MS. We now know that Obama was not just spinning rhetoric during the campaign. Some of us knew that quite a while ago.
    .
    Ditto sgw on ratsmussen.
    .
    nhautamaki said: … a conservative outside of America is a liberal in America. A conservative in America is a right-wing fringe politician outside of America, usually regarded as either dangerous or absurd. It’s amazing how much Americans have allowed themselves to get so far off center of the world’s political spectrum.
    .
    I disagree. For many years, public polling demonstrated broad agreement with Dem policy positions, but persistent and widespread RW propaganda uncritically disseminated by the msm had poisoned the Dem/liberal brand. It is quite interesting to watch, in real time, as an actual Dem-behaving-like-a-Dem President is on office and the repuglicans respond by panicking, becoming more and more shrill, and more and more publicly wedded to their extremist delusions that most American’s have never broadly accepted.
    .
    It really started with Palin and her off-the-wall rallies. Many Americans had never paid attention to the people who actually represent the repug base before. Buncha nuts. Didn’t like em. And now Rush is the de facto leader – and Americans don’t like him either. And then there is Beck, God bless him. Popular as heck with the base, seen as crazy by everyone else.
    .
    The repugs are just utterly exposed – and they got nothin but the crazy.

  • plukasiak

    It is almost impossible to imagine either Bush or McCain making such a claim on a world stage.
    -
    hogwash.
    _
    every time any politician is on the “world stage” they make nice sounds about “international cooperation” and say flattering things about other countries.
    _
    Obama’s approach may be a “kinder, gentler” (and not insane) American exceptionalism, but his attitude is still that of an exceptionalist. The rest of the world wants much stricter regulations of the global financial markets — and Obama has resisted that.
    _
    And Obama wanted the rest of the G20 to spend more on “stimulating” their economies — an attitude that belies his fundamentally “american exceptionalist” foundation. (Here’s a clue — because the US dollar is still considered the most solid currency in the world, the US can afford to spend lavishly on “stimulus” because it can borrow money so cheaply. The rest of the world doesn’t have that luxury…. Nevertheless, Obama felt that the rest of the world should follow the US lead…)

  • Dee in Columbia MD

    Me too PD! And quite frankly, we have been coasting on our reputation for so long we have deteriorated into a nation of incompetence, evidenced by the Bush administration. A return to acting in concert with our values will also lead to a return to the innovation and creativity that originally catapulted this nation into the economic stratosphere.

  • somepeoplelikeit

    Pluk, I guess you’re right…now that I think about it GWB was every bit the statesman Obama is.
    .
    THAT is hogwash.
    .
    The rest of the world wants much stricter regulations of the global financial markets — and Obama has resisted that.
    .
    Obama’s resisting the whole world? I need a link for that!

  • jsfox

    textee. The bow. You do know this is what is called in international relations – protocol. Every American President follows protocol and good international manners.

  • http://privcorr.blogspot.com/ wvng

    js, and who can forget W kissing the Saudi king and then strolling off into the sunset holding hands.
    .
    Perhaps heading to Iowa?

  • sacredh

    How does the bow rate in relation to Bush holding hands and prancing around his ranch in Crawford with the King of Saudi Arabia? More macho? Less macho? Don’t ask, don’t tell?

  • sacredh

    Who can forget the Saudi King ordering Bush to put the flight suit on that he wore under the Mission Accomplished banner? I think a sock was involved in that photo.

  • http://smoothlikeremy.blogspot.com/ sgwhiteinfla

    pluk
    .
    Weren’t you on balloon juice earlier saying that Begich should resign because Ted Stevens got done wrong and that people were who disagreed were hypocritical because Al Franken should have conceded before a recount?

  • 53_3

    textee:
    .
    And how about the time Bush harfed all over the neighboring dignitary at some diplomatic dinner?
    .
    Where is that on the dignity scale.
    .
    By the way, speaking of dignity, how is it that you guys can suck the peter of the Great White Whale so diligently and act like it’s anything other than grossly degrading self aggradizing behavior.
    .
    I mean, we are talking about, with Rush Limbaugh, something far beyond the realm of simple “subservience” as you so cavalierly put it…

  • matt1974

    As an immigrant to this nation, I do think that America is a very unique and great nation. I believe it’s greatness comes not from it’s military or economic might, but from a deep rooted ability of this nation to say “Yeah…we messed up”. In other words America unlike many other nations have an unique ability to accept it’s mistakes, apologize for the injustices it created. Such an attitude makes it possible for this country to learn from it’s mistakes and move on without getting hung-up on the past. I believe as long as America retains this ability, this country will be just fine.

  • 53_3

    “I believe as long as America retains this ability, this country will be just fine.”
    .
    You’ll never qualify as one of Rush Limbaugh’s dittoheads if you believe that!*.
    .
    *snarkage

  • http://stopsocialism.wordpress.com/2009/04/03/political-wisdom-obama-diverges-from-american-exceptionalism/ Political Wisdom: Obama Diverges from American Exceptionalism « Stop Socialism Now

    [...] Time’s Michael Scherer writes, “Like Bush, McCain believed in something called ‘American exceptionalism,’ which separated the U.S. from the rest of the world, in moral standing, in military power, in economic might, and in the ability to influence other nations…Obama came at the issues of foreign policy from an entirely different direction. While he said his first role as president would be to protect and improve the United States, he placed his country in a larger framework of nations, not above the framework. While McCain spoke about U.S. leadership (what ‘we did for Europe after World War II’), Obama spoke about collaboration, of a ‘new era of international cooperation,’ of ‘rebuilding our alliances,’ of rejecting ‘a foreign policy that lectures without listening.’ ‘America is strongest when we act alongside strong partners,’ Obama said in a major foreign policy speech last year, in reference to World War II. For McCain, that war showed how America could reshape the world. For Obama, the same conflict showed how America could work with others.” [...]

  • rustyreturns

    texte.
    What is worse a bow for the King of Saudi Arabia or when he bent over for Sarcosy?

  • rustyreturns

    AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

  • sacredh

    matt1974: Thanks for the kind words about our (and now your) country. We do take a lot for granted here because I believe we do have such a great country. Europe may be more “civilized”, but it was us that elected as president a member of a minority that we once held as slaves. We’re a mess, but we’re still a work in progress. We publicly trash our leaders and don’t give it a second thought. We make fun of them and each other. For all the problems we have, there’s still no other place on earth I’d rather live. Maybe Canada. They’re states too. We just don’t rub it in yet.

  • badkarma86

    O mischief, thou art swift to enter in the thoughts of desperate men!

    Great work sticking to the facts and not just mindless trolling, rusty.

    Oh, wait.

  • youcankeepthechange

    Yeah….I said it….. YOU CAN KEEP THE CHANGE!!!!!!! You dems or whatever you want to call yourself are a freakin’ joke. I will not stand for change that promotes abortion and socialism. Or taking money from the rich to give to the poor. Whatever happend to working for a living. Ahhhh but then again that is what you dems stand for…. A FREE HANDOUT. You people need to pull your head out of your asses and stop supporting this “president” who is tearing apart our country. God you people are freakin’ unbelievable…. I’m going to assume your still love struck with this joker. Looks like it’s time for a Tea Party!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • Ike Jakson
  • leslie54

    Finally a leader that uses humility and acceptance as a way to strengthen and replenish bonds that were destroyed, and degraded. In a New York minute Obama yanked us out from total humiliation caused by decades of American Presidents claiming we owned the world when in fact we are only a small part of this planet. Look at a globe one day and compare land size and you’ll see how small North America is. Obama see’s our limitation and humbly admits that American Ego has torn us to shreds and alienated us from the rest of the world. We are almost an economically impoverished country with a bad case of affluenza. We need the other countries to help us out of this mess. Obama is diplomatically seeking help admitting that bigger is not always better.

  • thiswomanopinion

    youcankeepthechange Says:
    Friday, April 3, 2009 at 9:59 pm
    Yeah….I said it….. YOU CAN KEEP THE CHANGE!!!!!!!
    ————————-

    You Repubs are all the same. What a joke you guys are? Even in your little rant you don’t want socialism and yet you have decided that you can tell others what they can do with their bodies. You don’t want government to interfere with citizens yet at the same time you want the federal government to only put through laws that you in you and you repubs approve of. That is fascism, comminism, dictatorship everything that your little group is suppose to stand for. No wonder you guys lost the election because you don’t know what side of the coin you are going to follow.

    Next free handouts well are your parents receiving social security? Are you? That means that you or they are receiving the free handout because it is the working generation that are paying for that money they get. That means that I and the rest of my generating has to support either you or your parents lazy asses. Are you going to send back your social security check, give up your Medicare benefits? Are you going to force your parents and grandparents to? I don’t it.

    How about unemployment? Anyone in your family on it? That is a free hand out. Are they going to give it up? Doubt it. See you repubs say one thing and yet turn around and have your hand out when it affects you.

    You and your repubs need to pull your own heads out of your asses and take a look at the world because we are not putting up with the lies, the failings of your party. The republicans were in power for 12 years from 1994 to 2006 which includes President Clinton and Bush. It was the Republicans who didn’t vet Bush who never held any public office other than 4 years as governor of Texas. He was totally unqualified to be President and the only reason he got in was brother Jed in Florida put the fix in for him. He was in power for 9 months the Republican party have been in charge 6 years at that time and had all the briefings about terrorist targeting the US and they ignore it. It was George Bush’s and the Republican party’s fault that 9/11 happen and no one else. Then Bush and the Republican party took away American Citizen’s rights in the name of so-call security. You Republicans cheered when you should have called him on it because it’s your party for having government staying out of private citizens lives. Another Repub flip-flop.

    Hell half of you don’t even know who is heading your party and more than 50% are say Rush. He is not even a politician! You own party shows that 18% approval rating for Republicans in the Congress.

    President Obama is the President of the United States and there is nothing you can do about it and that is killing you repubs because you can’t stand the idea that the American people are fed up with the flip-flopping behavior, the elitist snobbery, the outright lies, the greed that is the Republican party. Thank god that the people had it with you and people like you. We have a President that is respected by the world and can intelligently communicate with other leaders and with the press without looking like a fool as George W. Bush did.
    You and your kind has failed and betray the people of the US that is why you and your party were fired from the Government. You didn’t perform so we gave the Repubs their walking papers and they way you and other like you have been posting will ensure that the Republican party will not get in for at least another 10 years if your party every makes it back.

  • thiswomanopinion

    youcankeepthechange Says:
    Friday, April 3, 2009 at 9:59 pm
    Looks like it’s time for a Tea Party!!!!!!!!!!!!
    ——————————–
    Oh by he way I forgot to tell you this sentence above is considered hate speech. That’s right hate speech. Why because you are inciting people to do violence. You have the right to speak your mind but not to incite violence and that is where you stepped over the line. Your IP,ISP, you name and address have probably been recorded by the governement thanks to the Republican’s Patriot Act. This information that has been collected will be added to a the list of protenial domestic terrorist. The software used to moderate all forums and blogs searches for words like what you and your fellow idiot republican bloggers have been posting. It is collecting everything you type, the sites you visit and purchases you have made. Continue in this manner and you will find yourself facing federal charges including treason. So think before you post … oh that’s right you repubs don’t think but govern by your guts. That is why you guys are going to fail. You repubs couldn’t find your way of a wet paper bag.

  • http://www.hulagate.org hulagate

    Blame America 1st, Last, Always?

    Hey, there’s some progress.

    = CHAMBERPOT ACCOMPLISHED =

  • http://www.hulagate.org hulagate

    Obama: FOOL

    WHEN, Mr. President, has Old Europe EVER carried ANY of the major league load, in the last 60 years — including their own self defense?

    Sir, you are a PHREAKING IDIOT.

  • sacredh

    “I will not stand for change that promotes abortion and socialism”

    Good luck with that. Indignation is hardly a substitute for election results. Change has come whether you “will not stand” for it or not. It’s here. More changes will follow as surely as the sun rises and sets. Obama is not tearing this country apart. He’s tearing “you people” apart. The rest of us (the majority) see him as unifying the country. The RW had their moment in the sun and THEY tore this country apart. The healing process has begun. I’m sorry you feel the need to pick at the scabs that resulted from the wounds that your party caused. If you don’t like the first 2 months of his presidency, you’re REALLY not going to like the next 7 years and 10 months.

  • riceharvester

    ThisWoman,

    “Next free handouts well are your parents receiving social security? Are you? That means that you or they are receiving the free handout because it is the working generation that are paying for that money they get. That means that I and the rest of my generating has to support either you or your parents lazy asses.

    If you had a job — of course then you wouldn’t be a liberal, you would realize that workers pay into social security, so it is hardly a handout. For bonus points, who wanted to privatize SS?

    Are you going to send back your social security check, give up your Medicare benefits? Are you going to force your parents and grandparents to? I don’t it.

    Why?


    How about unemployment? Anyone in your family on it? That is a free hand out. Are they going to give it up? Doubt it. See you repubs say one thing and yet turn around and have your hand out when it affects you.

    That isn’t a free handout. If you knew anything about business, you would know that employers pay into this out of the business profits.

  • riceharvester

    sacredh Says:
    Saturday, April 4, 2009 at 8:05 am
    “I will not stand for change that promotes abortion and socialism”

    Good luck with that. Indignation is hardly a substitute for election results. Change has come whether you “will not stand” for it or not. It’s here. More changes will follow as surely as the sun rises and sets. Obama is not tearing this country apart. He’s tearing “you people” apart. The rest of us (the majority) see him as unifying the country. The RW had their moment in the sun and THEY tore this country apart. The healing process has begun. I’m sorry you feel the need to pick at the scabs that resulted from the wounds that your party caused. If you don’t like the first 2 months of his presidency, you’re REALLY not going to like the next 7 years and 10 months.

    How are you liberals going to deal with an armed revolt? Run to Canada?

  • sacredh

    “How are you liberals going to deal with an armed revolt? Run to Canada?”
    A small group of far right wingnuts are upset because most of the country didn’t vote for their candidates and they’re going to send the majority of us fleeing in panic northward? Let me know in advance when you start to play soldier. I’ll set the DVR to record your coup attempt. Trying to overthrow the elected government of the United States is treason you know. You need to take a deep breath and realize that your party LOST. They lost BIG. They and people like you were thrown out. You’re finished. Have your little meetings and wave your arms. You’re history.

  • sacredh

    POSS. President Obama Stress Syndrome. Treatable, not curable.

  • sacredh

    A little advice to the clueless. Look at the polls. Most of us like and approve of what we are seeing from the President. He’s popular. Very popular. As for the bizarre claim that if we had jobs we wouldn’t be liberals…us liberals voted for Obama so that we have a better chance of KEEPING our jobs. And speaking of jobs, have you ever heard of Homeland Security or heard the rumor that the internet is monitored for terms such as “armed revolt”? It’s their job. They take it seriously. They’re protecting us from lunatics like, well like you. If you want to keep the job you have and not change your occupation to license plate maker, dial the crazy talk down a few notches. There’s always the chance that you’re basically a decent person who isn’t holding his family hostage. Go outside and enjoy the spring weather. Plant a few flowers around your bunker.

  • 53_3

    Hey sacred!
    .
    Have you noticed that in the post-extinction world these right wing taxa have begun to exhibit a response to the more hostile environment by adopting nocturnal habits?
    .
    Should I turn the electricity off again?

  • 53_3

    “I will not stand for change that promotes abortion and socialism”
    Keepthechange:
    .
    Well, lie down, then!

  • Ike Jakson

    Where is this Unity thing so many talk about? Where is this Peace and Love for all? I see a Nation torn apart in these columns! Global Vision? What a lot of nonsense? If you guys can’t even be civil to each other, what’s the use of any Global Vision, even more so if it adds to grater division in America? World Affairs come in cycles; right now America has lost the way and won’t get on track again if you can’t stop insulting each other. Don’t cry for me America; cry for thee and for thy children.

  • sacredh

    53_3: I did notice that their sleep cycles have been disrupted. It also occurred to me that they’ve lost it to the point where they aren’t even able to sleep at night. The constant tick, tick, tick from the clock contains a message I have a great deal of compassion for the lunatic fringe (no I don’t…it just seems like something Ghandi would say), but when their guy was running things they said that if we didn’t like the way things were that we should just leave the country. Now that our guy is in there and they don’t like it, we should…ta da…leave the country. It’s their country and it doesn’t matter what the majority wants. Wait until the next election when finally have the clout to have them implanted with microchips.

    And yes, turn off the electricity again. Pavlov’s dog was easier to train.

  • sacredh

    Ike: Unity can only be accomplished if you have everyone working for it. The RW isn’t willing to compromise. They’ve decided what is acceptable and what isn’t. Until they get their act together and stop worshipping ignorance, I see no reason to coddle them. There is no common ground with them. It’s their way or the high way. It’s “you’re either with us or against us”. When you deal with tunnelvision, you can’t see the whole picture. They’ll either come along or they won’t. My own personal opinion is “screw em’”. I have as little use for them as they did for me.

  • http://swampland.blogs.time.com/2009/04/04/obama-too-is-an-american-exceptionalist/ Obama Too Is An American Exceptionalist :: Swampland – TIME.com

    [...] by michaelscherer | Comments (0) | Permalink | Trackbacks (0) | Email This PRAGUE–On Friday, I wrote a blog post on Barack Obama’s new more collaborative approach to foreign policy, and contrasted it with the [...]

  • 53_3

    sacred:
    .
    Always did like that ‘Love it or Leave It’ gambit. Did you know that was their catchphrase way back in the ’70s when I was finishing up school?
    .
    click
    .
    Ok. It’s off. Again.

  • FlownOver

    Somebody let me know when Scherer gets over his compulsive T-prompter references in his Obama “reporting.” If he does, maybe I’ll start reading his posts again

  • FlownOver

    Somebody let me know when Scherer gets over his compulsive T-prompter references in his Obama “reporting.” If he does, maybe I’ll start reading his posts again

  • sacredh

    53_3: I was very familiar with the “Love it or leave it” catch phrase. Did you also notice that whenever someone left for Canada that they insisted that the objectors be hunted down and brought back? I think we should have a new catch phrase for them. “When the last sane republican leaves the party…please turn out the lights”.

  • getourcountrybacknow

    Would everyone wake up!!! Obama is selling you this crap, hook-line & sinker. He’s about change, change for a “new world order” right?
    Look & see who his apointed people are… They’re all from Wall Street! Does this tell you anything?(MONEY) These so-called partnerships will ruin other countries as well as our own thru big money. We lost our country to banks back in 1913, Woodrow Wilson said he should have not let that happen. Kennedy tried to get it back from the banks (Federal reserve)& was killed for it. We as a Nation need to take action into getting our country back FOR THE PEOPLE. Obama is NOT for the people, he’s a puppet by & for the richest people in the world that control the Federal Reserve. The Federal reserve (which is a private holding…not Federal as it implies) controls us & our Govornment. Obama is not the man that is going to change things for the better, the media wants you to believe that he is, but his actions are showing different if you look at them in a little bit different way. This will not stop until we as a people get rid of it. Please see this video on Youtube & decide for yourself. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eAaQNACwaLw

  • http://ikejakson.wordpress.com/2009/04/06/cycles-andor-circles-in-the-affairs-of-nations-and-countries/ Cycles and/or Circles in the Affairs of Nations and Countries « Ike Jakson’s Blog
  • http://kansasprogress.com/wordpress/index.php/2009/04/13/political-wisdom-obama-diverges-from-american-exceptionalism/ Political Wisdom: Obama Diverges from American Exceptionalism | The Kansas Progress

    [...] Time’s Michael Scherer writes, “Like Bush, McCain believed in something called ‘American exceptionalism,’ which separated the U.S. from the rest of the world, in moral standing, in military power, in economic might, and in the ability to influence other nations…Obama came at the issues of foreign policy from an entirely different direction. While he said his first role as president would be to protect and improve the United States, he placed his country in a larger framework of nations, not above the framework. While McCain spoke about U.S. leadership (what ‘we did for Europe after World War II’), Obama spoke about collaboration, of a ‘new era of international cooperation,’ of ‘rebuilding our alliances,’ of rejecting ‘a foreign policy that lectures without listening.’ ‘America is strongest when we act alongside strong partners,’ Obama said in a major foreign policy speech last year, in reference to World War II. For McCain, that war showed how America could reshape the world. For Obama, the same conflict showed how America could work with others.” var addthis_pub = ‘kansasprogress’; var addthis_language = ‘en’;var addthis_options = ‘email, favorites, digg, delicious, myspace, google, facebook, reddit, live, more’; [...]

  • http://swampland.blogs.time.com/2009/06/04/barack-obamas-international-hope/ Barack Obama’s International Hope – Swampland – TIME.com

    [...] insists on a common global identity that is far more powerful than the differences. This vision, as I have touched on before, does not elevate the United States as the protector of transcendent values, but rather lowers [...]

  • http://ikejakson.wordpress.com/2009/06/08/building-bridges-burning-others-an-incredible-journey/ Building Bridges, Burning Others – An incredible Journey « Ike Jakson’s Blog
  • http://ikejakson.wordpress.com/2009/06/11/building-bridges-burning-others-an-incredible-journey-special-update-for-swampland/ Building Bridges, Burning Others – An incredible Journey Special Update for Swampland « Ike Jakson’s Blog
  • Yellow Hat17

    Hi,
    Can you descibe as accurately as possible, what this means? Or do you have any references? ::

    “Assimilation of all countries into a World Socialist government”.

    THANKS

blog comments powered by Disqus