Scandinavian = Wuss?

Seems that Rahm’s brow beating sessions with Senate Banking Committee Chairman Kent Conrad (D-ND) have paid off. While Conrad last week was adamantly opposed to including reconciliation instructions in the budget, this morning he told reporters on a call that he’s pretty much expecting to get rolled when the bill goes to conference with the House. House and White House Dems want the provision in the budget — just in case health care reform fails to make it through regular order. Budget reconciliation only requires a 51-vote threshold in the Senate, thus avoiding a filibuster.

Here’s Conrad’s odd explanation (what does being Scandanavian have to do with anything?) in an amusing exchange with Roll Call’s Emily Pierce on the call:

Emily Pierce:
Senator, saying prefer — you would prefer not to do reconciliation is not very strong language. It leads me to believe that you’re leaving the door open to signing a conference report that has it in there.

Senator Conrad:
You know, Emily, I’m Scandinavian. What can I tell you? I’m — I don’t control the outcome of the conference. You know? I’m a participant, but I don’t control the outcome. And so — you know, I’ve stated by strong preference is not to have reconciliation. I will argue that position strongly in conference, but I can’t control the outcome. And one thing I’ve learned around here I’m not going to commit to outcomes that I can’t control.

Subscribe to Jay Newton-Small on Facebook
Related Topics: Uncategorized
  • Latest on Swampland

    Pete Souza / White House

    Obama’s Persuasive Powers on Gay Marriage Manifest in Maryland

    When President Obama endorsed gay marriage earlier this month, the media grappled with two basic political questions: Was his personal “evolution” a case of a politician transparently following a national trend toward accepting same-sex unions (accelerated, perhaps, by his chatty No. 2), and would it hurt his re-election chances by alienating socially conservative voters like black churchgoers? Sure, there was a recognition that it marked a gratifying moment for gay-marriage advocates — as well as some grumbling about the President’s view that it remains a state issue, not a federal one. But by and large, there were few suggestions that one man, even the President, would shift public opinion on the issue or affect public policy. Based on a new Public Policy Polling survey out of Maryland, it seems this possibility was underestimated.

    Lewis Eisenberg, Major Romney Donor, Accuses Obama Of Demonizing Wall StreetHuffPost Politics

    Cherokee Zero

    Apparently, Massachusetts voters don’t mind that Elizabeth Warren foolishly identified herself as a Native American early in her academic career–it was, apparently, a case of family pride and wishful thinking about a Cherokee ancestor. That’s good. Warren may be the best public figure when it comes to explaining the depredations of the financial industry and [...]

  • Mad As Hell

    I don’t know what the Scandinavian thing means either, but this is a good piece of news.

  • Ivy_B

    As a long time Prarie Home Companion listener, I think I know, but am checking with two friends of Scan descent.

  • bangormaine

    Prairie Home Companion is a good start to understand this. Check with anyone who has lived in the upper midwest. Scandinavians are a humble lot.

  • Paul-no not that one

    “Scandinavians are a humble lot.”
    .
    Take my word for it those hoopleheads aren’t humble, just passive-aggressive.

  • bangormaine

    They CAN be passive-aggressive, but I’ve seen NYers be that way, too! It’s the understated, humble, I don’t want to stand out too much or claim to much for myself kind of thing that is quintessentially upper-midwest Scandihoovean.

  • stuartzechman

    That’s fantastic, Jay Newton-Small.
    .
    What in God’s name does he mean by “I’m Scandinavian”?
    .
    What if I were negotiating the minimum amount due on an unpaid credit card bill with Visa on the phone, and I suddenly mentioned “You know, I’m a Viking…”?

  • dunedweller

    sz – then Visa would tell you to call Capital One!
    .
    I’m of norse decent and I don’t have a clue what he means except maybe he’s “fishing” for support?

  • http://nicewhitelady.blogspot.com/ joyomama

    Maybe it’s just code for Lutherversalist (Lutheran->Unitarian Universalist). (His Wikipedia bio says his parents were German American, and he’s now a UU.) But he also attended Exeter, same class as Judd Gregg.

  • stuartzechman

    Visa would tell you to call Capital One!
    .
    LOL Got me!

  • http://smoothlikeremy.blogspot.com/ sgwhiteinfla

    I don’t know much about Scandinavia but was there ever a time when they were ruled by someone else or weren’t in control of their own destiny? That would seem to be the only way that reference would make sense.

  • FlownOver

    Uff da! Anyone who’d eat lutefisk will swallow anything!

  • formerlyjames

    I think the Scandinavian refers to Minnesota nice way of behavior and talk. Easy going, don’t get excited, don’t raise your voice.

  • spob

    A lot of wussy Scandinavians in Malmo, given the current cave to radicals on the issue of Israel’s tennis team.

  • shepherdwong

    So even thoroughly modern, intelligent-looking, young, journalist women are seduced by our ever-so-serious political press to look at any compromise (by a Democrat anyway) in testosterone-laden, “wussified” frames of reference. Say, when do you kids graduate middle-school? Neato.

  • Ivy_B

    One of my Scan friends said it sounded like he was trying to avoid being blamed if it went wrong. That and the passive aggressive humility!

  • http://swampland.blogs.time.com/2009/04/03/budgets-pass/ Budgets Pass :: Swampland – TIME.com

    [...] meet to hammer out the differences between the two versions – though by late yesterday a consensus was emerging on most of the main issues. And then the real fun begins: appropriations, universal [...]

blog comments powered by Disqus