Wanted: A Villain to Play the Foil to Obama’s Hero

Every great hero needs a nemesis to overcome – look at how engrossed the nation became with Barack Obama’s epic struggle for the Democratic nomination with Hillary Clinton. In their search for an opponent after the defeat of John McCain, Democrats and the media have alternately tried to promote Rush Limbaugh, Eric Cantor, Sarah Palin and the clearly not ready for prime time Bobby Jindal (not to mention the b-list: Romney, Pawlenty, Sanford and Crist). For those you laboring under the misapprehension that the Obama White House has spent all of 20 minutes talking about Rush this week, as early as January Obama had Limbaugh in his sights. It has always behooved the Dems to promote Limbaugh as he can be relied upon to say something outrageous and gin up the Dem base.

But with no next generation Newt Gingrich on the horizon, the GOP has settled into a caretakership – with Minority Leaders Mitch McConnell and John Boehner steering opposition to Obama’s agenda and looking to gain at the edges, testing new messages and strategies in local and congressional races. This hullabaloo over whether Democratic strategists — and, gasp, not the pristine White House! —  have been looking for straw men to slay is ridiculous; it would only surprising if they weren’t looking for a foil for Obama. As the GOP tries to reorganize itself in the wake of stunning losses on both ends of Pennsylvania Avenue, the lack of a figurehead is perhaps the silver lining of the party’s leadership vacuum: there is no clear opponent, no one to take responsibility and no one for Obama to defeat.

Subscribe to Jay Newton-Small on Facebook
Related Topics: Uncategorized
  • Latest on Swampland

    Morning Must Reads: Severe

    Romney: I Was A 'Severely Conservative' GovernorHuffPost Politics

    Seth Wenig / AP

    Birth Control Debate: Why Catholic Bishops Have Lost Their Grip on U.S. Politics—and Their Flock

    The clash with the White House over birth control is a reminder of just how much influence the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops has lost in the 10 years since the child sex abuse crisis erupted in America.

  • Joe Bftsplk

    JNS, did you have a gander at the comments to MS’s post below?
    I’m not sure you really want to wade into this one, too.
    On the other hand, there are fewer physical dangers in Swampland than in Cartagena, so if you’re willing…

  • http://www.inworldstudios.com jayackroyd

    What an incoherent pile of drivel.
    .
    The President doesn’t need a foil. The Media needs one. The Narrative needs a pair of opponents. The real shocking thing that is going on is that, unlike after 9/11 (a much smaller crisis than this one) Republicans are not pulling together for the sake of the country, but rather obstructing what needs to be done.

  • Dee in Columbia MD

    JNS– So you decided to join the Republican driven narrative that the white house is picking on Rush. I get it you don’t want to be out of the loop, you don’t want to be irrelevant. Of course you’ve added nothing to the conversation and traded any modicum of journalistic ethics you might have retained — but so what right?
    .
    Congratulations, its affirmed, the last time we called you on following the GOP talking points over that non-existent CBO, you were harried and hadn’t checked properly. But clearly that was no accident — because oops you did it again.

  • Jay Newton-Small

    JoeBftsplk: You read my Cartagena story! Now that one was truly fun to write — much more fun than dreary DC. And, yes, I leap into the fray open eyed…
    JNS

  • Dee in Columbia MD

    @Joe — Of course she read Michael’s post. she saw 382 comments and said oh man how do In get that. I never get more than 30 comments even on a good day. I’m gonna get me a piece of that.

  • Dee in Columbia MD

    oops In = I

  • exile500

    Thanks, Jay. This was so sane and clear-headed, I was surprised to see that it was written by a Time magazine reporter.

  • plukasiak

    White House has spent all of 20 minutes talking about Rush this week, as early as January Obama had Limbaugh in his sights.
    _
    this is gross intellectual dishonesty. In both cases you cited, Gibbs was asked specifically about Limbaugh — to say that “Obama…had Limbaugh in his sights” when your citations are to questions asked of GIBBS specific to Limbaugh is irresponsible.
    _
    The media is cares more about pushng this story than does the White House. Its like your insistence on pushing the “class warfare” meme — you can’t talk about complex issues, so you create/magnify artificial conflicts.

  • gysgt213

    “Democrats and the media have alternately tried to promote Rush Limbaugh, Eric Cantor, Sarah Palin and the clearly not ready for prime time Bobby Jindal”
    .
    I’m not sure what you mean here. These people are promoting themselves by saying destructive and stupid crap. The dems may be jumping on the stupid crap they say, but what f**k are they supposed to do? The media gives them air time but they are not forcing them to say stupid crap.

  • Dee in Columbia MD

    So if you really want to add something why didn’t you say something like when the GOP trots out Ari Fleischer you know they are in trouble. That’s the big gun they drew out the last time they had a problem with a press secretary (Scott McClellan) and now he’s going Mano a Mano with Gibby right.

  • Jay Newton-Small

    Dee in Columbia:
    What are you talking about? That document from the CBO that was leaked to me was valid and it was nearly identical to the real CBO report that came out a week later. We’ve been over this — though you seem to have selective memory.
    JNS

  • 2cute4prison

    JNS, Jay beat me to it. The media needs one.
    .
    Obama is like Mike Tyson in his prime, he didn’t need a “foil”. He was the champ. You can line up contenders all you want, just like the GOP, but nobody’s touchin’ him right now.
    .
    “the lack of a figurehead is perhaps the silver lining of the party’s leadership vacuum:”
    .
    Republican playbook 101: Act like your weakness is actually your strength and see if anyone buys it.

  • http://elvisberg.wordpress.com Elvis Elvisberg

    Democrats and the media have alternately tried to promote
    -
    Umm… are you aware that there’s a GOP out there too? Is David Frum just off his rocker over Limbaugh, like the folks at the Corner think? Or not?
    -
    Does Limbaugh run the GOP or not?
    -
    You are correct that media sucks at reporting the news, choosing to write about foils and the choice thereof in lieu of substance. So maybe if we keep talking, we can find more common ground out there.

  • http://nicewhitelady.blogspot.com/ joyomama

    I nominate “ignorance” as Obama’s nemesis; that way citizens and journalists can join the fray, if they want.

  • Paul-no not that one

    It’s all a game, eh?

  • http://phd9.blogspot.com Paul Dirks

    What made the “Epic Struggle” between Obama and Clinton so interesting was the fact that once the primary was settled, they were going to have to switch back to being BFF’s. That made a significant part of the drama revolve around questions as to who had “crossed the line” and had excessively trashed their opponent. One of the results of all this manuevering is that suddenly everyone assumes that the secret to Obama’s success is that he plays nice and has ‘risen above’ standard political maneuvering.
    .
    The fact that it’s all horse$4!^ seems to have flown over the heads of the commentariat. Obama is a politician. Anybody who expresses surprise that he acts like a politician or worse yet, talks about how ‘shameful’ it is that he acts like a politician needs a serious narrative adjustment procedure. The proper tool, of course being a ball-pein hammer.

  • gysgt213

    More and More I think the bloggers here waited until they got their talking points before blogging about this. Either that are they stealing their opinions from other websites and presenting them as original thought.
    .
    Some Republicans have taken to blaming the media for conflating the idea that Limbaugh is the leader of the party.
    .
    “He’s no more the head of the Republican Party than The New York Times prints the talking points of the Democratic Party,” said Sen. John Cornyn of Texas, head of the National Republican Senatorial Committee. “I say that with all due respect.”
    .
    “I think MoveOn.org affects the Democratic Party quite frankly more than Rush Limbaugh affects the Republican Party, in terms of elected leadership,” said Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.).
    .
    But Graham added that he doesn’t “think it’s healthy” for talk radio or other interest groups to have too much influence over policy so “you can’t make rational decisions.”
    .
    http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0309/19641_Page2.html

  • g_crush

    .
    …And now Limbaugh is daring Obama to come on his show and debate the issues. Limbaugh’s an opportunistic clown, which is probably one of the reasons why the the right-whingers like him so much.
    .
    If Limbaugh, the de facto head of the GOP and drum major for the lemmings of the right wingnut-o-sphere, wants to debate Obama, the thrice-divorced drug-addled gasbag will have his chance to prove the correctness of his views when the 2012 election season comes around. That, or prove that the conservative movement…
    .
    …”is a tale told by an idiot, full of sound and fury, signifying nothing.”

  • gysgt213

    First we had Time’s Michael Scherer with his the-Democrats-made-Rush-do-it nonsense (click here for a chuckle), and now Times’ David Von Drehle tops that with his painfully dumb take on the Limbaugh story.
    .
    Headline:
    .
    Criticizing Rush Limbaugh: Over the Line?
    That’s right, Rush is now the victim.
    .
    Read, if you must:
    .
    Sooner or later, most presidential administrations make some version of the Sun King’s mistake. “L’etat c’est moi,” Louis XIV of France is said to have declared – “I am the state.” To criticize the man becomes downright unpatriotic. White House press secretary Robert Gibbs crept up to that line – even put his toe over – as he tried to capitalize on the anti-Obama declarations of talk-show behemoth Rush Limbaugh.
    .
    Got that? Reporters asked Gibbs about Limbaugh. Gibbs answered, and now Gibbs is at fault because, according to Von Drehle, the arrogant White House is trying to silence dissent.
    .
    Von Drehle, completely making stuff up, claims the White House has dubbed criticism “unpatriotic.”
    .
    http://mediamatters.org/countyfair/

  • Deggjr

    ‘Gin up the base’? The Democrats are merely trying to expand Rush’s audience from the true believers to the undecided voters. Coincidentally, that’s Rush’s goal too.
    .
    The recent apologies to Rush Limbaugh show that Rush is calling the shots in the Republican party. Why should the Democrats ignore their most prominent critic? From their perspective there’s no better Republican face than the ‘I’ve got mine & the rules don’t apply to me’ Rush Limbaugh.

  • kbanginmotown

    JNS: Good job linking nearly every noun, verb and adjective in your story. It helps to see where you are coming from.
    .
    But I think you overlooked Obama’s true nemeses at this point in time: The Financial Crisis and the Struggling Auto Industry. *These* and the issues that concern us outside of DC.
    .
    Jay: Back in December/January, you provided *excellent* coverage of the Auto Industry’s troubles and the efforts to secure loans (not bail-outs) to see them through. Please continue!
    .
    Away from the Dark Side you should stay! Of Rush post no more!

  • http://phd9.blogspot.com Paul Dirks

    In case I didn’t make myself clear, I’m not sure of anyone who cares to claim the White House is pristine. But the only people who seem geuinely surprised that its not are MS and JNS.
    .
    If they weren’t pointing and laughing at Rush they’d be derelict in their duty. And as I said in MS’s thread, to highlight and ridicule the Malkin/Palin/Rush/Coulter wing of the Republican party is to perform an important Government function in that it clears the path of idiots and means that they can focus on the real opposition to their agenda instead of faux-populist outrage that has driven debates in the past.
    .
    The issue isn’t WH involvment. It’s Scherer’s peculiar appetite for smelling salts.

  • http://smoothlikeremy.blogspot.com/ sgwhiteinfla

    Lets recount the history of the Rush Limbaugh “story”
    .
    First unprompted Limbaugh makes a statement about bending over and grabbing his ankles and saying he wants the President to fail. No nuances at that point AT ALL. Just that he wants him to fail. Period.
    .
    Second in a CLOSED DOOR MEETING President Obama makes a comment to the Republican Leadership that they can’t listen to Rush Limbaugh and expect to have constructive bipartisanship. Just like the gossipy little kindergarteners they are Republicans rush out from the meeting to make off the record statements recounting what President Obama said.
    .
    Third Rush Limbaugh makes other comments about hoping Presidnet Obama fails. Phil Gingrey says something in opposition then has to go back and kiss Limbaugh’s ass. This is picked up by several talking head shows.
    .
    Fourth Rush Limbaugh promotes falsehoods about the stimulus plan that get parroted by the GOP showing that they apparently didn’t take Obama’s advice. The term “porkulus” which Limbaugh coined is used by such Congress folks like Senator Grassley, and a false health care rationing story about a health IT provision in the stimulus bill promoted by Rush Limbaugh is repeated over and over by several Congressional Republicans.
    .
    Fifth Robert Gibbs is ASKED QUESTIONS BY THE SAME ASS HOLES WHO ARE NOW SAYING ITS WRONG TO TARGET RUSH about Rush Limbaugh’s statement. He doesn’t attack Rush personally but he says that he doesn’t believe its appropriate for most Americans to be pulling for failure. At the time he makes no mention of Rush being the leader of the party.
    .
    Sixth Chris Matthews among others starts asking the question of if Rush Limbaugh is the leader of the Republican party. This is after Governer Mark Sanford opposes Rush then just like Gingrey comes back and kisses Rush’s fat ass and asks for forgiveness.
    .
    Seventh talking heads start asking Republicans if they agree with Rush Limbaugh. Hilarity ensues.
    .
    Eighth Rush Limbaugh as keynote speaker for CPAC where President Obama is accused of not being a natural borne citizen, a socialist and jokes are made about nuking Obama’s city of Chicago, and he again reiterates wanting Obama to fail. This time with a little nuance so as to try to cover his ass. But nobody thinks to ask him how America will rebound if in fact President Obama’s policies fail.
    .
    Ninth Rahm Emmanuel picks up the meme and takes it over the endzone by saying what has already been posited by numerous talking heads and that is that Rush is now the defacto leader of the Republican party.
    .
    Tenth Mike Steele goes on DL Hughley’s show and calls Rush’s show incendiary and ugly, by 6pm the next day he follows the script and kisses Rush’s fat ass and asks for forgiveness. Hilarity again ensues and Steele is threatened by anonymous Republican figures that he is going to lose his job if he doesn’t knock off “slamming” Rush
    .
    Eleventh talking head shows again ask several Republicans if they agree with Rush.
    .
    Finally Robert Gibbs IN RESPONSE TO A QUESTION FROM THE SAME ASS HOLES WHO ARE SAYING THE WHITE HOUSE TARGETED RUSH says they press should go ask Republicans if they agree with Rush.
    .
    Now how this is targeting Rush Limbaugh is beyond me. The Republican party is on Tee Vee plenty enough that I think if they don’t want Rush to be seen as the leader of the party all they ahve to do is say he isn’t. But they won’t even utter the words “Rush was wrong” for fear of him. The MEDIA drove this story. The MEDIA asked all the questions about Rush. The MEDIA wanted a foil for President Obama who hasn’t said anything in public about Rush being the leader of the GOP. The MEDIA kept asking Republicans if they agree with Rush. And now to cover their own ass the MEDIA is trying to point the finger at the White House. Sorry but you can save that sh*t JNS. You spent more time in writing this post than the White House has done addressing Rush collectively in public. Just because the hacktacular GOPoltico writes a story asserting there was some kind of conspiracy doesn’t make it so. And guess what JNS when YOU GUYS stop asking questions about Rush Limbaugh the story will go away. So look in the frikkin mirror before you hit that fainting couch if you want to see who is responsible for this story.

  • mccainfluffer

    It’s amazing! People in the media, like JNS, apparently have no responsibility for what they report on. If it wasn’t for those all powerful “strategists” pulling their puppet strings, they could be covering serious issues like Michelle Obama’s scandalous bare arms.

  • gysgt213

    What is different from what JNS and Michael are saying and John Boehner is saying? JNS, Michael and John just happen to approach this issue in the excat same way.
    .
    Make no mistake: This strategy did not develop out of thin air. Democratic pollsters began laying the groundwork for this effort last fall. What’s particularly regrettable is that all this is unfolding at a time our nation can least afford it.
    .
    President Obama has said that we must change the way Washington operates in order to address the unprecedented challenges of today. I hope that those inside and close to the administration begin heeding his advice, because the change-the-subject campaign they are employing is the oldest trick in Washington’s book. This isn’t about the leadership of political party officials or the influence of radio hosts. It’s about the need for both parties to work together toward real solutions to end this recession and put Americans back to work.
    .

  • g_crush

    .
    Jay, can you print out what sgwhite wrote at 9:20a, read it to yourself, and then staple it to Scherer’s forehead?

  • gysgt213

    Democrats’ Diversionary Tactics

    By John Boehner
    Thursday, March 5, 2009;

    Forgot the link:
    .
    http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/03/04/AR2009030402895.html?hpid=opinionsbox1

  • http://nicewhitelady.blogspot.com/ joyomama

    sg — Great time line!! (Language needs to be cleaned up before it goes in the middle school text books, of course.) Also, loved your post today on Jon Stewart’s send up of CNBC. Thank heaven for political satire, which works best when it is reality-based.
    .
    For swamplander wanting to see the post:
    http://smoothlikeremy.blogspot.com/2009/03/on-cnbc-glass-houses-torches-and.html

  • http://nicewhitelady.blogspot.com/ joyomama

    g-crush – I tweeted it to MS, sorry no staples on teh web

  • http://policingwingnutwelfare.blogspot.com/ JJ

    Rush Limbaugh is Lakoffian shorthand for this.
    .
    It’s also a good way to make the other side declare their loyalties, something Republicans have been forcing Democrats to do for decades. It’s forcing wingnuts to think, which they’re visibly uncomfortable doing. They’re so used to having daddy do it for them.

  • Matt

    Come on… It’s Rush!

    http://www.political-buzz.com/

  • plukasiak

    Lets recount the history of the Rush Limbaugh “story”
    _
    very nice summary, sg!

  • http://policingwingnutwelfare.blogspot.com/ JJ

    And going up against Rush is not “slaying straw men.” Rush Limbaugh is a symbol everyone understands. He’s a bully with a microphone. He stands for Fox News, Republican PR shops, the Weekly Standard, movement conservative think tanks… Most people don’t think in those terms, but if you say Rush Limbaugh, everyone understands what you’re talking about. A bully with a microphone.

  • http://policingwingnutwelfare.blogspot.com/ JJ

    If you say “the unelected Republican para-government,” no one knows what you mean. If you say Rush Limbaugh, everyone does.

  • pierogielunaire

    Jay,
    .
    What’s maddening is that you and Scherer come at us with this attitude about how naive we are in our perceptions of Obama and his administration, and it’s like you don’t even see their game plan. Yes, they are doing everything possible to cripple the Republican uh…leadership… before big votes on the budget and healthcare. It’s awesome. Any questions?

  • Benny

    “Every great hero needs a nemesis to overcome”
    .
    You see, people: you may have thought Obama had a rather full plate already, what with the economy, Afghanistan, etc. Nope. Turns out you were wrong. Obama needs MORE than those piddly items. He needs MORE to overcome! And so, unless Obama PROMOTES Rush Limbaugh, no one will ever know about Rush Limbaugh & his 13 million listeners, 600 radio stations. Makes sense.

  • http://policingwingnutwelfare.blogspot.com/ JJ

    What sg said, too. Democrats aren’t running this clown show–the Republican machine is doing fine being a spectacle all by itself.

  • rustyreturns

    The farce in all of this is simply the Democrats in control of the White House using a political ploy such as this to divert real discussion about the budget and stimulus package Obama has requested. It isn’t about the welfare of the people of America, just more of the same political bullcrap by Obama and Emanuel.
    .
    Well go ahead and talk about Limbaugh, and his endless quest for attention, and divert the real discussion ladies and gentlemen. Go ahead and talk about all of the past mistakes that have been made by the Bush Administration. Go ahead and “feel good” about yourself that you now have a Democrat in the White House. Enjoy it while you still have a chance, because soon, as Rome burns, we all go down in flames together.

  • ogliberal

    JNS – Can you give a media insider’s response to sgwhite’s post from 9:20am?

  • http://smoothlikeremy.blogspot.com/ sgwhiteinfla

    Thanks g_crush, joyo, and pluk
    .
    Here is the thing though. There is actually good reason to go after Rush Limbaugh. Its not because he is a conservative hate filled pill popping philanderer although those are good reasons also. Its precisely because members of the Republican party don’t listen to Rush to be entertained but also to be informed. They take things Rush says on his show seriously and in point of fact have repeated them on both floors of Congress as matters of fact. The major media failing in the last two months is an unwillingness to call out these lies when they come and instead leaving up to the KOs Maddows and Jon Stewarts of TV to expose them when they know that a lot of people will dismiss those people debunking the lies because they are quote “partisan”. And because Rush Limbaugh is the source of a lot of these “facts” then its important to refute the root of the problem. The truth is I personally wish the White House would distribute a list of quotes by Republican Congressmembers and then under each quote give the analagous root quote from one of Rush’s shows with the time and date for each quote. To me THAT would be targeting Limbaugh but I know it will never happen. What pisses me off is when journalists create something then wags that finger at someone else when it takes off. Especially when their airing of grievances sounds suspiciously like Republican leadership statements issued on the same day or a a day previous. Funny how one day two Swamplanders in particular had nothing to say about the Rush story and this was AFTER Rahm said what he said. But then the very next day and the day after they have plenty to say and it just so happens so does Republican leadership who up until this point has been quiet on the matter. I am beginning to wonder if certain members of the media are rooting for their own failure. I am sure Rush would get on that bandwagon as well.

  • http://phd9.blogspot.com Paul Dirks

    I’d like to note that Scherer would probably never have participated in this pushback except for feeling totally embarassed on behalf of Michael Steele. Thats the reason the story is mainstream as well as it should be.
    .
    The ring-kissing continues…..

  • Dee in Columbia MD

    Whoa JNS– I appreciate that you have responded to my comment and I welcome your participation, but I think you are the one with the selective memory.
    .
    “That document from the CBO that was leaked to me was valid and it was nearly identical to the real CBO report that came out a week later. We’ve been over this”
    .
    Yeah it was nearly identical except for the fact that it didn’t exist in the format initially claimed, and the numbers cited to describe the stimulus plan did not represent the stimulus plan in the format up for vote. Yeah it was an outstanding effort to inform the public by providing them with half truths and innuendos.
    .
    You can make me the problem but your work speaks for itself. Or are you trying to imply that the story line in this post was an original thought that came in a dream to you and the rest of the GOP simultaneously.
    .
    I get it, you write whatever they tell you even if it is not the truth. Truth is not a requirement only sources, oh yeah you don’t cite sources either you just promise that you have them and I’m supposed to take your word for them.
    .
    You act as if your so-called insider access makes you infallible. Far from it, you got this one wrong. The GOP is in disarray. Rush is destroying what is left of their image with independents and moderate Republicans. No one in the party can stop him without facing his wrath.
    .
    They are hoping that by promoting this meme that the Democrats are being frivolous picking on Rush in this time of great crisis instead of paying attention to the big problems we face, that they can put the Dems on the defensive. They are hoping Democrats will be scared off by the potential backlash and put a stop to this for the GOP.
    .
    The GOP is in a hole, they can’t stop Rush from digging and they know that your people will not turn away from a car wreck so they have manipulated you and your kind to turn on the Dems for you blood lust fix in hopes that it will encourage the Dems to take away the shovel.

  • gysgt213

    “Funny how one day two Swamplanders in particular had nothing to say about the Rush story and this was AFTER Rahm said what he said. But then the very next day and the day after they have plenty to say.”
    .
    Not only to they have plenty to say, but its the very same story line being pushed. Sure the reporters here reword it, but they are saying the same thing.

  • Benny

    “As the GOP tries to reorganize itself [...] the lack of a figurehead is perhaps the silver lining of the party’s leadership vacuum [...] there is no one for Obama to defeat”.
    .
    There’s always good news–for Republicans.

  • sacredh

    The conservative media is doing everything they can to keep this story alive. They claim the Obama administration is targeting Rush unfairly. The only thing they’re doing is using quotes that Rush “wisely” repeats over and over again and usually even THAT is in response to direct questions. What the RW media can’t figure out is why people aren’t as upset as they are. It’s really very simple. Most people don’t like Rush, think he’s a bigot, don’t agree with him and see his statement that he wants Obama to fail for exactly what it really is…he wants the country to fail so that the republicans can get back in power. It’s party over country and everyone except the wingnuts have figured that out. There’s no mystery here. We’re not outraged. It’s karma. If the republicans insist on swallowing handful after handful of sleeping pills, don’t be shocked if we hand over a bottle of vodka to wash them down with. I’m all for assisted suicide if a terminally ill patient wants to stop the pain.

  • ogliberal

    “Its precisely because members of the Republican party don’t listen to Rush to be entertained but also to be informed.”
    .
    I can’t bring myself to listen to the idiot. Plus, I’m rarely in a car. (I train to work) But my best friend does endure the pain of tuning in every once in a while to listen and he says that Limbaugh regularly tells his listeners that they needn’t read, watch, or listen to the news – that he’ll do the work for them and deliver the real news to them himself. My guess is that most of his listeners follow this advice. (command?) That GOP lawmakers do the same – and as sgwhite noted, they do – is pretty frightening. So yeah, going after the guy who sets the GOP’s agenda is both acceptable and necessary.
    .
    That said, based on Obama’s schedule and public events and the flurry of legislation he has either signed and or proposed in this short period of time, it’s pretty apparent that 99% of his and his team’s time is spent on dealing with our domestic and foreign policy issues/crises. And if the WH reporters would stop asking Gibbs about Limbaugh and Cramer and Santelli, I don’t think he’d bring any of them up on his own.

  • FlownOver

    gunny –

    I agree wholeheartedly it’s time for the pols to work together. I think the administration, confronted by unanimous opposition on the stimulus, is just clarifying the public view of partisan opposition. The WH is saying, in effect, “You guys are gonna look like Limbaugh if you keep this up,” and the polls tend to validate this tactic. The rest of the message, not sufficiently simplistic for the Village, is: “We’d all be better off, and you’d have more respect and influence, if you’d stop looking (or talking or acting) just like Limbaugh.”

  • http://policingwingnutwelfare.blogspot.com/ JJ

    I was surprised a while back to learn that an old guard Republican like George W Bush Sr. is a devoted watcher of Fox News. A party is in trouble when it reads its own press and thinks its gospel.

  • http://polderjongen.wordpress.com/ polderjongen

    What Dee and sgwhite said.

    Nothing to ad. Just my disgust at JNS and MS

  • http://policingwingnutwelfare.blogspot.com/ JJ

    Sorry, should be George H W Bush, not George W Bush…

  • http://smoothlikeremy.blogspot.com/ sgwhiteinfla

    As a sidenote GOPolitico (you know the people that ran the story yesterday about the “conspiracy” by the White House to attack Rush) hack Roger Simon was just on MSNBC asserting that indeed Rush Limbaugh is the voice of the Republican Party. You can’t make this sh*t up!

  • Friar Tuck

    A wise person once told me:
    .
    “The more you run over a dead cat, the flatter it gets.”

  • Dee in Columbia MD

    JNS — So now that you courageous, GOP water carrying, scribes have put a stop to frivolous commentary out of the white house and single handedly forced the Obama administration to pay attention to the great crises facing our country, Contessa “bimbo” Brewer is claiming that the number one story on MSNBC is whether or not Obama has died his hair gray to appear more seasoned.
    .
    Hmm another distraction ccoming out of the white house?

  • egilsson1

    .
    A sadly foolish column.
    .
    Maybe JNS hasn’t noticed, but Obama is trying to pass incredibly important legislation during a period of intense crisis. Limbaugh has actually emerged a rallying point of opposition – and he’s given live TV time by a couple of national TV channels to articulate it.
    .
    Politics is great, but too much shallow and stupid personality jockeying by the national media – including shallow and stupid Swampland bloggers (Tumulty and Klein excluded) – isn’t providing much light v. heat.
    .
    What’s more alarming is that these posts are totally coincident with a clear republican response. It’s like JNS and Scherer read the RNC strategy memos and passed them along at the same time Boehner and others were articulating this same concept.
    .
    Of course republicans don’t like Obama and democrats eviscerating and humilating them. It’s working, so we get corporate media pushback.
    .
    I have believed Scherer was whoring himself out to Halperin for internal career advancement. Maybe it’s true for JNS too.

  • http://policingwingnutwelfare.blogspot.com/ JJ

    JNS: “In their search for an opponent after the defeat of John McCain, Democrats and the media have alternately tried to promote Rush Limbaugh, Eric Cantor, Sarah Palin and the clearly not ready for prime time Bobby Jindal…”
    .
    Maybe part of the Democrats’ problem is an abundance of worthy choices… (let that sink in for a minute).
    .
    A good part of the reason why we’re in the messes that we’re in is the bankruptcy of the Republican party–who you might notice have controlled much of our government in recent years. Now what’s your argument again that this is the *Democrats’* fault? And tell me again why Democrats can’t point to this failed leadership when making arguments to run the government differently than Republicans?

  • http://smoothlikeremy.blogspot.com/ sgwhiteinfla

    Funny that the White House was stressing over Rush so much that they still found time to sign go on an Arab TV station to address the Middle East, sign into law Lilly Ledbetter, SCHIP, and the stimulus bill, ban torture, overturn mexico city policy, overturn Bush midnight measures on oil leases, send ambassodors to the Middle East and Asia, submit an ambitious budget, get the second half of the TARP money, submit a plan to combat the housing crisis, meet with the Canadian Prime Minister and the British Prime Minister, address both houses of Congress in a NSOTU address, host a fiscal responsibility summit and is now hosting a health care reform summit, outline a plan to bring the troops home(whether people agree with it or not) and do so much so fast that JNS wrote a post just yesterday that soon there won’t be much for her to write about until the summer. Yeah they are REALLY sending too much time on trivial sh*t.
    .
    Gimme a break!

  • sacredh

    Friar Tuck: My grandmother was borderline crazy and an alcoholic. When she was terminally ill she turned to religion. Although most of her life was a tribute to hedonism, she turned very conservative during the last year of her life. She became outraged over the lax morals in the country. She dropped this nugget on us during one visit: “If God had meant people to run around naked, they’d have been born that way”. I think the republicans are in the same boat right now. They’re saying things but don’t realize that people are hearing just the opposite of what they meant to say.

  • rustyreturns

    Hey SHORTER DEMOCRATS, Rome is burning and you cry for fairness on a total political stunt by Rahm Emanuel, the ballerina turned White House Chief of Staff?
    .
    AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
    .
    Its all about Stimulus and Pork, dorks! Push the media into a feeding frenzy ala, Sarah Palin style with a pregnant teenage daughter rather than reporting on substance.
    .
    Push a non-issue to the forefront of the news cycle to stem the flow of Democrat Senators who are falling like flys to the power of the people who recognize that the so called stimulus package and pork laden budget for the next 6 months is nothing but smoke screen to spend billions on political paybacks for getting your a$$ elected.
    .
    Problem is the people of America are not stupid. In fact, they know when they have been duped into the biggest farce since Huey Long raped Louisiana. Now it is just the corrupt Chicago political machine raping America.
    .
    Hey Rahm, how many billions can you get piped into the bank accounts of your favorite political donors like Tony Resko, and still call it “STIMULUS”??

  • dbcooper71

    JNS:

    Obama’s rope a dope strategy has scored again by sucking you in this morning, just like it did to MS yesterday. Hard to believe you folks are so thick.
    .
    Somewhere, Hunter is howling like a coyote at your woeful ineptitude.

  • Friar Tuck

    @sacredh -
    .
    I never cease to be amazed at the number of people who quietly believe what your mother said out loud. There are plenty of Christians who believe the somehow God was not responsible for the creation of genitalia except perhaps as an unintended consequence of His pulling Eve out of Adam’s ribcage.

  • Aaron

    Which of Michael Scherer’s mistakes, recounted in detail by Greg Sargent yesterday, does Jay Newton-Small repeat?
    .
    She complains that Barack Obama and his administration answer questions about Rush Limbaugh when asked. Journalists have been complaining about the lack of bipartisanship for months. Why should Barack Obama lie when he can tell them the truth?
    .
    As noted above, she lies about the fact that Rush Limbaugh had been exerting his leadership over the Republican Party longer than Barack Obama has been complaining about it. It would be a “straw man” only if it isn’t true. Every Republican official who has complained about Rush Limbaugh over the past 12 months has recanted.
    .
    Finally, she confuses cause and affect. It is Barack Obama’s fault when he complains about where the Rush Limbaugh leads the Republican Party. This illogical construction is equivalent to blaming a fire alarm for causing the fire it detects.
    .
    .
    Thanks to Jay Newton-Small for providing the link to Greg Sargent that proves to everyone that not only are these posts are packed with lies, but also that they exist due to Matt Drudge.
    .
    .
    http://theplumline.whorunsgov.com/political-media/new-media-meme-obama-team-solely-to-blame-for-rush-story/
    .

  • http://policingwingnutwelfare.blogspot.com/ JJ

    Here’s another way to look at it. Republicans won’t adapt to Obama. What Sam Tanenhaus called “revanchist” conservatism is winning:

    …There are two strains of conservatism. One strikes me as recuperative, and it says, “If we can adjust to the prevailing liberalism of the moment, we can make it serve our purposes.” The other seems to me revanchist, and it essentially says, “Something has been taken from us, and we have to get it back.” That is the harder-edged conservatism that seems almost constantly at war with the more adaptive conservatism.

    Today’s GOP won’t compromise. It is revanchist. Rush Limbaugh is the poster child for revanchist conservatism. Everyone knows who he is. Everyone immediately knows what he believes. Plus he has control of the base–which is populist and revanchist in an unappealing way, and has lots of political power, and the Republican elites know it, and these days, they don’t like it. The GOP has been using right wing populism against the Democrats for decades. Why isn’t it fair to point it back at them? Let the voice of the GOP revanchist base, Rush Limbaugh, be as loud as he wants. As someone said above, this is karma, pure and simple.

  • Aaron

    Jay Newton-Small:

    That document from the CBO that was leaked to me was valid and it was nearly identical to the real CBO report that came out a week later. We’ve been over this

    .
    Dee in Columbia MD:

    Yeah it was nearly identical except for the fact that it didn’t exist in the format initially claimed, and the numbers cited to describe the stimulus plan did not represent the stimulus plan in the format up for vote.

    … and the inflation rates were completely different, the description was wrong, the numbers didn’t match up proportionally with the numbers released a week later so the estimate was using a completely different and likely invalid model …
    .
    Other than the fact it was wrong, it was completely valid.

  • Art Pepper

    I vowed to myself I would stop posting comments on this kind of post, because it just drives up the comment numbers. But I have to say:
    .
    SG, your summation of the events was better than anything JNS or Michael posted about this “issue.” You should submit your invoice to TIME for correcting their drivel.

  • sacredh

    Friar Tuck: It was my grandmother. I’ve only seen my mother have a drink three times in my life. My 2nd wedding, my sister’s wedding and the night Obama won. It is strange that most christian people don’t realize that wearing clothes came about BECAUSE of sin. If I’m wrong and there is a God and an afterlife, I’m going to be surrounded by republicans shocked they aren’t in heaven. After all, they did SAY they believed in the teachings of the Bible. Maybe they should have read it instead of just displaying it prominently on their coffee tables.

  • Benny

    jns: “In [the Democrats'] search for an opponent after the defeat of John McCain…”
    .
    Obama: “I’ve been searching and searching, and I’m getting tired. Won’t *someone*-anyone-step forward and oppose me?? Please, just ONE little Republican?? How about you, talk show hosts??? How about if us Dems “promote” one of you??? Bueller???”

  • 53_3

    “Hey Rahm, how many billions can you get piped into the bank accounts of your favorite political donors like Tony Resko, and still call it “STIMULUS”??”
    .
    About 1/10th as many billions the GOP piped into bank accounts of their favorite political donors!
    http://blogs.moneycentral.msn.com/topstocks/archive/2008/11/24/the-real-bailout-cost-7-4-trillion.aspx
    .
    Friar! Yup! That cat is pretty flat, isn’t it?

  • sacredh

    53_3: Not only is it flat, you can’t even tell what it was to begin with. All you know for sure is that it’s gross and that you want to avoid it.

  • gysgt213

    CNN’s Roberts pressed Giuliani to explain Republicans “paying … unflinching fealty to Rush Limbaugh,” added “they’re kissing the ring, Mr. Mayor”

    .
    http://mediamatters.org/countyfair/200903050006?show=1
    .
    Scarborough on Steele, GOP: “I think six months from now, they’re gonna have to turn to somebody else.”
    .
    http://mediamatters.org/countyfair/200903050005

  • gysgt213

    Obama’s favorability rating is at 68% (an all-time high in our survey), 67% say they feel more hopeful about his leadership, 60% approve of his job in the White House, and 49% have a positive view of the Democratic Party (which is also near a high). On the other hand, just 26% view the GOP positively (an all-time low in the poll), respondents blame Bush and congressional Republicans for most of the partisanship in DC, 56% think the GOP’s opposition to Obama is based on politics, and Republicans lose by nearly 30 percentage points on the question about which party would do a better job of leading the country out of recession.
    .
    All’s I can say is thank God for polling. Because if the surveys didn’t exist we’d still have a press corps focusing on the Republicans’ “win” over Obama’s stimulus package. (Why? Because Republicans always outmaneuver Democrats.) A win that, according to the American people and not the surgically disconnected Beltway press corps, was actually a colossal failure.
    .
    For those with short-term memory woes, let’s recap how, just a few weeks ago, the press was tipping its cap to the GOP and its genius stimulus strategy of going all in against Obama and slapping the president’s hand of bipartisanship.
    .
    *Politico’s Jeanne Cummings warned Obama was “losing [the] stimulus message war.”
    .
    *The Los Angeles Times, Peter Wallsten asserted that “[a] surprisingly unified GOP has taken control of the debate” about the stimulus plan.
    .
    *The Wall Street Journal’s Jonathan Weisman and Naftali Bendavid referenced in a February 6 article “Republicans’ remarkable success during the past two weeks … shaping a public image of the bill as pork-laden and ineffective.”
    .
    *Newsweek senior editor Michael Hirsh wrote that that Obama “has allowed the GOP to turn the haggling over the stimulus package into a decidedly stale, Republican-style debate over pork, waste and overspending.” Hirsh continued: “Team Obama and his party are losing the debate” about the stimulus plan.
    .
    *On MSNBC’s 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, Newsweek senior White House correspondent Richard Wolffe claimed the Democrats’ “messaging has not worked.” Wolffe also stated of the administration: “What they haven’t done is say, hey, it’s not just about spending. It’s about mitigating, softening the blow of this recession for regular, working Americans. That’s the bit they’ve failed on. They’ve let it be hijacked by all this extraneous spending programs.”
    .
    *On CNN’s Lou Dobbs Tonight, congressional correspondent Jessica Yellin asserted that “official Washington has decided Obama is losing the PR war on the stimulus.”
    To repeat: the Republicans’ public approval ratings are now at an all-time low. The press never saw that coming.
    .
    http://mediamatters.org/countyfair/200903050007?show=1

  • http://www.hulagate.org hulagate

    Oh hell, I’ll take on Frozone.

    Where do he plug in his No-Vett-O-Meter?

    Next to his Tax-Cheats-O-Meter?

    LET THE EPIC STRUGGLE OF GOOD AGAINST OBAMIZMIZZESSEZZ INCOMPETENCE COMMENCE.

  • Ohg Rea Tone

    Many people do not have the stature, either professionally or intellectually, to counter Obama. We would like to see a debate between Rush Limbaugh and Michael Moore. How about it Rush, call Michael and make the challenge. ………………

    http://thefiresidepost.com/2009/03/05/calling-rush-limbaugh-debate-michael-moore/

  • http://www.hulagate.org hulagate

    “…I nominate “ignorance” as Obama’s nemesis…”

    ===

    OH HELL YES.

  • Benny

    Of course, Obama could’ve gone the George W. route and simply chosen the perennial “Some say…” as his nemesis, albeit one made of straw. Why bother searching for a real opponent?

  • http://www.hulagate.org hulagate

    “Many people do not have the stature, either professionally or intellectually, to counter Obama.”

    To include the president of Canada.

    Now where did I put my 57 state map of the Obama Nation?

    Oh, there it is.

    Next to this month’s issue of BLACK BUFFOON.

  • http://www.hulagate.org hulagate

    The first great failed super zero of 2009:

    BLACK MAN.

    “Quick Rahm, in to the Code Pink Cave, we have to surrender to Russia in Time for the PBS Festival coverage of China eating Africa…”

  • http://www.hulagate.org hulagate

    BLACK MAN theme song coming soon.

  • Ivy_B

    Let’s see – proof that this was an evil plan hatched by Obama back in the fall — proof given, an article in the WaPo by John Boehner where he says so. Well never mind, that’s all I need. He doesn’t even reference the non-Obama staff Carville and Begala by name, but I guess doesn’t need to. What a guy.
    ,
    As Aaron noted above, the link you gave under hullabaloo to the Greg Sargent post was an excellent one, but seems to undermine almost everything you say in your post.

  • gysgt213

    Anybody want to send their apology to Rush?
    .
    http://www.dccc.org/content/sorry

  • Ivy_B

    Another excellent Greg Sargent post on the odious Politico -
    .
    From an internal memo -
    THE POLITICO FORMULA: We explain how Washington really works, pull back the curtain on the palace intrigue of official Washington, and document who is trying to get and keep power, and how. Our stories are NECESSARYfor political and government players, and FASCINATING to outsiders.
    .
    THE MISSION: Politico journalism drives conversation in official Washington, making us ESSENTIAL READING for anyone who is or wants to be a player, and a KEY OUTLET for anyone who is trying to shape a political or governmental debate.

    http://theplumline.whorunsgov.com/political-media/more-on-politico-and-the-inside-game/

  • http://policingwingnutwelfare.blogspot.com/ JJ

    Here’s Steve Benen’s reply to today’s Boehner WaPo op-ed (the latest in that “don’t listen to that talk radio host behind the curtain” campaign that Scherer stenographed yesterday):

    I don’t think Boehner fully appreciates the point of “diversionary tactics.” As the Minority Leader sees it, Democrats don’t want to talk about their economic policies, so they’re talking about Limbaugh.
    .
    But here’s the follow-up question: why would Democrats be reluctant to talk about their economic policies? Americans *like* the Democrats’ economic policies. The policies make sense, especially when compared to Republican rhetoric about spending freezes, tax cuts, deficit reduction, and a balanced-budget amendment to the U.S. Constitution.
    .
    Put it this way: with Democrats enjoying a huge advantage on economic policy in the midst of an economic crisis, and with the GOP’s economic agenda coming straight out of the Hoover playbook, what possible incentive does the majority party have in mulling “diversionary tactics”? Why engage in a “change-the-subject campaign” when your side is winning the most important economic debate in generations?

  • Cliff

    OMFG, this isn’t f–king Spider Man, you twit.

  • egilsson1

    Gunny, that’s a good point about the polls.

    Remember the role the insta-polling played during the debates? Various moron gasbags would listen to garbage from McCain/Palin during the debates and start pontificating that they thought McCain/Palin “won”, only to be nuked 2 minutes later when they realized that Obama had landed a haymaker. By the 3rd debate, they were clearly more cautious because it was apparent they didn’t know what the heck they were talking about.

  • Friar Tuck

    @sacredh
    .
    Apologies! I mistake grandmothers for mothers and vice-versa every Sunday. I say this to my shame.
    .
    I’m seriously glad that one of the occasions was Obama’s election! Mrs. Tuck and I got into the brandy that night too.

  • http://smoothlikeremy.blogspot.com/ sgwhiteinfla

    JNS
    .
    If you want to cover politicians being stupid and childish instead of focusing on the problems our country faces then notice how the Republicans in Congress are now referring to the Democratic Party as the “Democrat” Party. Talk about some silly ass sh*t and yet nobody but Tweety has called them out about it. I guess they really think its a winning political strategy.

  • http://zota.wordpress.com/ zota

    So you and Scherer looked at Rush Limbaugh saw an model to follow? Better to be widely-discussed target of outrage than a half-assed journalist, amirite!
    Our little right wing pundits on the bud…

  • commonsense84

    CUTE!!!
    You have just confirmed my thoughts about you… you are a right-wing HACK!

    You are spouting the same crap that NICOLE WALLACE- REPUBLICAN, FORMER MCCAIN AIDE, was saying last night on AC 360.

    You guys(Repubs) are so sloppy sometimes… you don’t even try to hide the fact that you are reading from the same talking points everyday.

    I’m at work so hopefully someone can post the video from youtube… she was saying the same thing last night in the first 20 minutes on AC 360 on CNN with Paul Begala

  • stuartzechman

    I think commenters better get on over to Karen Tumulty’s “cross the line” post, and have something to say about it –at the very least wishing her brother well in his illness.
    .
    I had a good argument to make against Scherer yesterday, in which I essentially said “Hey, f*cker! If Obama’s such a bad guy for criticizing Rush, why do you people make scandal out of nothing when the parties don’t spoon feed it to you? Aren’t you people the real problem here?“, and he basically said “Yeah, everybody’s the problem, and I don’t know what to do about it.
    .
    Well, we’re “everybody” too, and the more eyeball time we give to Jay Newton-Small’s bandwagon-jumping on Michael Scherer’s ripoff of Politico’s tabloid conflict-mongering, the more we prove the editors of Time Magazine that, for all of our high political views, we’re spectators at a professional wrestling show. They’ll give us more trivia, scandal and conflict, and tell us “our readers are bored with real issues“…and they’ll have a point.
    .
    I know it’s fun to argue, but don’t let an opportunity to show how important her work (and this kind of journalism) is go by, commenters. They put her on the front cover. Let’s make that a good move for Time Magazine.

  • sacredh

    Friar Tuck: My mom’s in her 80′s and as far as I know she’s never committed an illegal act in her life. A couple of months before the election she called me up and asked me how to get in touch with the ACORN people the news people were talking about because she wanted to vote as many times as she could. She was afraid McCain would take Ohio and reminded me that “every vote counts”. She was disappointed that she could only vote once. I had to go out and get an Obama sign to put in her yard to make her happy.

  • flagrantenigma

    This is just another rerun, by the same culprits, of the nonsense over the Fairness Doctrine. No Democrat showed any interest in resuscitating it, and it was Limbaugh and the rightwing hacks like Scherer and Newton-Small who started braying about a non-existent threat. This is just the same: Limbaugh starts snivelling about how everybody hates him, and how he wants Obama to fail. The Hackery gets all excited, ginns up some more meaningless antagonism, and then turns round and accuses Democrats of doing so. It’s pathetic, but exactly what you expect from the amateur hour in politics gang. Thia sort of dishonesty is why people are no longer buying newspapers and why nobody takes the media seriously. Newton-Small and Scherer – if you can’t research a story, and set it out honestly and clearly, you have no business calling yourselves journalists. There are plenty of braindead thinktanks for Republicans – go and work there as staff writers.

  • http://phd9.blogspot.com Paul Dirks

    Developing:
    .
    http://thehill.com/leading-the-news/rnc-member-calls-on-steele-to-quit-2009-03-05.html
    .
    Witness just how effective this Republican/Big Media pushback is.
    There now can be NO mention of the Steele/Limbaugh flap that doesn’t incllude mention that the Democrats have been working for months to cause it to happen.
    .
    Remember this well if you want to determine who actually runs DC.

  • dunedweller

    To use your redonkulous superhero analogy JNS:
    .
    Obama’s villain is the devastation that Bush & Co. created over the last 8 years. Limbaugh and the RW pundits you mention are only getting hurt because they are stupid enough to try and protect that devastation by blocking Obama’s attempts to defeat it.

  • http://www.hulagate.org hulagate

    Today’s Episode: Skippy Learns Some Math
    —————————————–

    “Golly gosh Black Man, that was a close one!”

    “Did you say close one, or The One? Anyhoo, right wing you aren’t, Rahm, but we must indeed the evil math that would require us and our media sycophants alike to divulge once and for all Time the rank & file failure of FDR’s stupid schemes, saved only by our friend Hitler.”

    “You mean we aren’t going to work on balancing the budget after all, Black Man?”

    “Rahm, you know and I know and the Amer-Asian people know that I have little if any ability to add and subtract, other than PayPal Gaza receipts. Therefore and forthwith, my little liberal lemming butt buddy, we will invoke Screw The Math, Enjoy The Show as our mediocre market meltdown mantra, while the world burns and Michelle busses the kids to private skoo.”

    “Holy Jesse Helms, Black Man, do you think it will work?”

    “It has to work, Rahm, or I’m going right into the 1-term ditch with the Jew bashing Carter and war hero Bush 41 (who I quite frankly thought was a good president, but got railroaded y another media meathead train that wanted a prettier panderer in the White House). Now on to the Blackmobile…”

    “Uh, sorry Black Man, but the Black Mobile’s still in the shop. GM’s parts orders from Mexico have been held up by the drug mobs that you let loose when you told the DEA to stand down last week.”

    “Drat! I knew something was afoot south of Fresno! Well Rahm, we’ll just have to obfuscate to Move On some other way. Is the Flyin Chittlin up and running?”

    “Sorry, Black Man, but since you grounded all the small aircraft last week following the Frozone phuck ups from Newark, we’ve had to park our economic battle wing too. We do have the Black Bike available though. Can I ride in the back this time?”

    “OK Rahm, that has given me a great idea, but I’ll vett it by you and Iorgo Sorrows to see if it Meets Up with the Hoofington Post gold standard for liberal largess in a unionized tanking economy. What say we give billions if not trillions of unaccountable funds to our lobbyist friends on Wall Street and the rest of the old Clixon regime change, and see if anyone notices that no one knows where the money actually went? Then we’ll blame some fat media guy for making us do it, declare victory, and vacation in Maui with Michael Phelps and Arseo Hall.”

    “Great scotch Black Man, here comes Jihad Joke Klein and his gang of noun raiders!”

    “Quick Rahm, to the Code Pink Cave, and pass me that copyright release form!”

    “You got it Black Man! Are we taking the Black Cadillac Escalade, Black Toyota Prius, or Black Windsurfer?”

    “No time to argue, Rahm, just jump on the next fad you see, and hope that nobody notices the lack of change from the Nixon years in our internal tactics!”

    “Right, Black Man, 10-4 roger that!”

    ———————————–

    We will return to BLACK MAN VERSUS THE VOLCANO after these messages from The Blago-Burris Legal Defense Fund..

  • Benny

    Obama’s goal is to pass comprehensive health care reform by the end of this year.
    .
    According to Limbaugh, Republicans want Obama’s agenda to fail (it’s their “dirty little secret”).
    .
    Maybe jns or scherer can ask Republicans for an “up-or-down vote” on whether they agree.

  • sy2d

    The Scherer dumb as a box of rocks plague is indeed contagious. Another damned drudge sycophant.

  • http://policingwingnutwelfare.blogspot.com/ JJ

    Limbaugh-style revanchism is consuming the GOP. Just ask Nate Silver or David Frum.

    If Rush Limbaugh is a good foil, he also crystalizes a ton about the mentality of the opposition–in addition to him having actual power. How many mucky mucks in the GOP have to kiss his feet?

  • CP in FL

    Obama’s opponents are the special interest groups and obstructionist Republicans that are going to try and get in the way of passing meaningful legislation to reform our healthcare system and the financial system, and to promote green energy.
    .
    It’s been fun watching the Republican Party implode over the past couple of years. Now we just have to avoid the republicans dragging the rest of the country down the shi**er with their party.
    .
    JNS – Your posts are usually informative and interesting; this post, not so much.

  • textee

    Joe Klein is such a clueless loon that he actually told Poltico.com that he didn’t know that Time magazine’s Jay Carney was a Democrat before Carney became a flack for the hair-plugged buffoon and serial plagiarist. Is Klein so clueless that he doesn’t know the politics of Jay Newton-Small? Will Newton-Small need to go work for the clueless socialist and unrepentant terrorist fraternizer for Klein to figure out that?

  • flagrantenigma

    “the clueless socialist and unrepentant terrorist fraternizer”

    Carefully, Textee. You know what happens to Republicans who talk honestly about Chairman Rush. Better get ready to be bent over the barrel before you “apologize”.

  • http://www.hulagate.org hulagate

    ANOTHER LIBNIK BITES THE BLOGOSPHERE…

    http://finance.yahoo.com/news/Treasury-secretarys-choice-apf-14561159.html

    How many IS that now?

    But by all means, SPEND TARP 2 WITHOUT THE LAW ENFORCEMENT ON HAND TO MANAGE IT, libwits.

    NICE FRIGGIN GOING.

    = DOW 5000 ACCOMPLISHED =

blog comments powered by Disqus