The Grass Won’t be Greener

The family planning funds were not the only monies Obama asked the House to strike from the stimulus bill on the heels of GOP carping; the $200 million National Mall revitalization fund was also removed.

During the election the Obama campaign always prided itself on leaving every venue he visited better off than how they found it. Such moves helped foster local appreciation and (hopefully) votes. Inauguration was like the final, and largest, campaign event and much of this money would have help undo the damage 1.8 million people trampling across the Mall caused and restore the mall to its original glory. I liked to think of the National Mall revitalization fund as Obama leaving this last campaign setting better than he found it, though, maybe spending nearly a third as much as Obama raised during the entire campaign is a bit excessive. But the Mall is rather bigger than all of his other venues and in more need of repair.

Anyone who has been to DC has seen the sandy paths ringing the reflecting pool and the Japanese cherry trees. Park staff is cognizant that people like to walk along the water and between the famed trees, but they have not had the funds to put in actual paved paths. Softball games on the Ellipse often turn into mini dust storms as the sad, balding grass provides little cover for the fields. I’m sure that there are much more deserving economic stimuli that are in the package, but I do hope that Congress will one day appropriate the money to restore the Mall. For better or worse it is one of the most visited places in the country and one of the more neglected. In the meantime if anyone wants to help, there’s a private group raising money to restore the Mall.

Subscribe to Jay Newton-Small on Facebook
Related Topics: Uncategorized
  • Latest on Swampland

    Pete Souza / White House

    Obama’s Persuasive Powers on Gay Marriage Manifest in Maryland

    When President Obama endorsed gay marriage earlier this month, the media grappled with two basic political questions: Was his personal “evolution” a case of a politician transparently following a national trend toward accepting same-sex unions (accelerated, perhaps, by his chatty No. 2), and would it hurt his re-election chances by alienating socially conservative voters like black churchgoers? Sure, there was a recognition that it marked a gratifying moment for gay-marriage advocates — as well as some grumbling about the President’s view that it remains a state issue, not a federal one. But by and large, there were few suggestions that one man, even the President, would shift public opinion on the issue or affect public policy. Based on a new Public Policy Polling survey out of Maryland, it seems this possibility was underestimated.

    Lewis Eisenberg, Major Romney Donor, Accuses Obama Of Demonizing Wall StreetHuffPost Politics

    Cherokee Zero

    Apparently, Massachusetts voters don’t mind that Elizabeth Warren foolishly identified herself as a Native American early in her academic career–it was, apparently, a case of family pride and wishful thinking about a Cherokee ancestor. That’s good. Warren may be the best public figure when it comes to explaining the depredations of the financial industry and [...]

  • Cliff

    Only communists take pride in the appearance of our nation’s capital.

  • Suzie in MD

    I was in D.C. for the inauguration, and was stunned by the sheer amount of trash and destruction left behind by the revelers. Amid my joy at waving goodbye to Bush’s helicopter, I was ashamed that we left the Mall in such bad shape (though I picked up my own trash and a few extra pieces!). To me, the Mall and the museums and monuments in D.C. are a testament to the best of our nation, and I certainly wouldn’t object to investing money to make them as lovely as they should be. Hopefully, that money will be forthcoming, even if it isn’t allocated in this particular bill.

  • Suzie in MD

    Should I change my username to Pinko in MD?

  • http://phd9.blogspot.com Paul Dirks

    I’m sure that there are much more deserving economic stimuli that are in the package…
    .
    But that’s the problem with ANY spending project. There will always be people who benefit more than other people, and those other people will ALWAYS be easy to convince that the money’s being wasted.
    .
    Add to that the sneaking suspicion in heavily Republican parts of the Country that the people who benefit are undeserving minorities who aren’t hard working Patriots like their neighbors and you have all sorts of worthwhile ideas being $#itcanned before they’re even considered.

  • Cliff

    Should I change my username to Pinko in MD?
    .
    Get out of my country.

  • wvng

    Suzie, I was pretty shocked as well. But with that many people in one place it was probably bound to happen.
    .
    As for JNS’ point, hard to see what is not stimulative in restoring the Mall. Supplies would be purchased, and people would work at landscaping. Spending and labor. So what if it is relatively short term?

  • Cliff

    (Also please realize I’m being snarky, I’m just trying to emulate a Red State-er.)

  • wvng

    Cliff, Suzie spent Christmas in Sweden, that hotbed of socialism. Probably a danger to our country now.
    .
    What say you Suzie?

  • Suzie in MD

    wvng,
    .
    Well, what else can I say except…¡Viva la revolución!
    .
    P.S. Also, and more appropriately for my travels: Jag älskar socialiserade medicin.

  • queencersei

    Could someone please explain why Republicans feel so strongly that sprucing up the National Mall is a terrible waste of money? You would think they of all people would want the nation’s capitol to look it’s best. And it does seem like a project that would immediately put people to work. I don’t understand the opposition to this. Anyone?

  • Ohg Rea Tone

    Never underestimate President Obama. He has the best understanding of Political Parlor Games since FDR. His simple Oracle is win/win. …………..

    http://thefiresidepost.com/2009/01/28/political-parlor-games-and-obamas-oracle/

  • cincinnatus est exterminata!

    “I don’t understand the opposition to this. Anyone?”
    .
    Don’t you listen to our media? The only acceptable form of stimulus is tax cuts for the wealthy or corporations that’ve been hiding their money overseas. Joe,Karen or JNS did a poll at a cocktail party and found that 100% of respondents didn’t need shovel ready work…so that would totally be a waste. There’s a report out that shows 91.7% of the media believes Wal-Mart is a store for wall stuff.

  • wvng

    cincy, my local weekly paper did a on-line poll asking if Obama’s stimulus package would help average Americans. The winner (38%) was: No, economic recover must start with more private investment, not government intervention.
    .
    As if the problem isn’t that private investment has dried up.
    .
    Aaaarrrrrgggggghhhhhhhh!

  • Deggjr

    queencersei, the Republicans are doing a spot-on imitation of Monty Python’s Argument Clinic.
    .
    “An argument’s not the same as contradiction.
    .
    Well,can be.”

  • queencersei

    Thanks for the link Deggjr, my co-worker and I had a good laugh!

  • Art Pepper

    And it does seem like a project that would immediately put people to work
    -
    Yes, but those people are in the wrong tax bracket.

  • Matt

    How come supposed pork like the re-sodding or family planning – only they were conservative pet projects – always got through with GOP support when they controlled the Hill?

    http://www.political-buzz.com/

  • Aaron

    Apparently covering 57% of the $350 million National Mall maintenance and repair project backlog was just too much to ask. That said, if anyone asks for shovel ready projects to create jobs, I’m sure the National Park Service has a few with that $6 billion backlog for all national parks.

  • cincinnatus est exterminata!

    wvng, you live in W Virginia right? Am I an @sshole for pointing out that they might be a bit behind the times there and that maybe they’ve been thoroughly trained by their conservative overlords to respond in just such a manner? I say thing because the national polling seems to say the opposite.

  • cincinnatus est exterminata!

    On MSNBC just now: Here we are with this huge bill and all we’ve been talking about for the last couple days is birth control, how did that happen?(paraphrased). Our media is stupid beyond belief.

  • cheesemanforever

    The stimulus bill is necessary, the GOP has backed itself into a corner by opposing it even after it’s been modified to include more tax cuts. They will continue to look like the “party of no” at a time of need by opposing this, and they have positioned themselves to look like fools in 2010 when the stimulus bill and other action being taken do their inevitable good.

    That being said…the House Democrats made themselves easy targets by including a potpourri of “causes” in the bill that honestly don’t have much to do with putting people back to work or reviving the economy. The argument that some of the spending is intended to help the states deal with their own budget crises is valid…but some of the legislation should have been proposed (and voted up or down) on its own merits.

  • Dee in Columbia MD

    See Republican think that all of the national parks should be turned over to mining and ranching interests. Apparently they don’t see tourism as part of our economy — off shore drilling in Florida!

  • gysgt213

    I think the Mall money was needed for this.
    .
    http://thinkprogress.org/2009/01/28/dhs-chertoff-book-speeches/

  • wvng

    cincy asks: Am I an @sshole for pointing out that they might be a bit behind the times there and that maybe they’ve been thoroughly trained by their conservative overlords to respond in just such a manner?
    .
    No.
    .
    That is another edition of simple answers . . . .

  • wvng

    Our local newspaper op-ed curmudgeon is also arguing about “torture” today, and seems to believe that “24″ ticking time-bomb scenarios are real. This guy – http://tinyurl.com/ce4gmx – suggests not.
    .
    /migraine.
    .
    We seem to be surrounded by a tidal wave of teh RW stoopid since the inauguration. The msm must be in hog heaven, as noted by cincy #20.

  • wvng

    JNS, KT, whoever, I have a serious question for you. Given that the teevee folks are a different breed, it is still astonishing to see how they rush to cover every inconsequential thing the RW throws out about the stimulus bill, and cover it in the least substantive manner possible.
    .
    As cincy noted in above: Here we are with this huge bill and all we’ve been talking about for the last couple days is birth control, how did that happen?(paraphrased). Our media is stupid beyond belief.
    .
    It is really astonishing. Josh Marshall is about as worked up as I have ever seen him. I fear he will have an aneurism:
    .
    Over the last few days I’ve been trying to take stock of an essential element of the current stimulus debate: namely, Hill Republicans have been getting a lot of air time and minimal press criticism for a series of arguments about the stimulus that are in most cases transparently ridiculous. For instance, I heard several House Republicans yesterday making the straight up argument that the renovation of the Capitol Mall wouldn’t create any jobs or stimulate the economy. Well, obviously any major building project creates jobs. Nothing could be more straightforward. Whether it’s the best long-term use of the money, in the sense of whether the building project will have spin-off effects creating greater productivity and growth over time is a decent question. And looking at what’s in the bill I find myself wishing that more of the more was being spent in a more concentrated fashion — largely on infrastructure projects. But every major building project creates jobs. . .

    And yet for all of this, most reporters seem to take these non-sensical criticisms completely on face value, grading on a curve, as it were, not giving these folks a hard time because they’re well-liked much as we might with a dumb jock in the physics class who gets a free ride because no one expects anything different from him.

    .
    So my question. Is it possible for the chattering classes to take anything, anything at all, seriously? Collapse of civilization? Anything?

  • Jay Newton-Small

    wvng:
    You’re right that the teevee folks are a different breed and I can’t speak for them except to refer you to the excellent book “Three Blind Mice” by Ken Auletta about the downfall of the big three networks and how our news subsequently got so crappy. As for us, I was going to do a post today on all the crap that’s in this bill — and yes, I do think the House version is particularly egregious — but I didn’t have time. Hopefully tomorrow. There are things in the House bill that simply mystify me — it reads like Dave Obey’s wish list of funding for the last 20 years. The Senate bill is infinitely better and I think conference will only do good things to it. But, frankly, when your own House and Senate colleagues are criticizing the bill, you know it’s not all that. JNS

  • formerlyjames

    The right wingers want to dissect the stimulus effects of the bill too finely. Maintaining the National Mall, the giant tribute to our democracy, is a matter of pride and statement. Like the politicians pompador hairdoos. Make that pitch to them. Hey, congressman, the mall needs care just like you need a blow dryer. Get it?
    .
    The family planning issue I don’t know how to explain to them. That would extend beyond their understanding of bouffant hair. Let us pray.

  • ldfla

    As I watched the inauguration on TV, I thought how beautiful the mall was while covered with people. Without the people, the beauty of the surroundings are obscured by the dust!

  • FlownOver

    Republican message techniques applied to the Republicans’ vote in the House: Republicans want recession.
    .
    See? Its easy – you just have to oversimplify to the point of absurdity, and shorten to the length of a bumper sticker.

blog comments powered by Disqus