Caroline Kennedy: Hey, Wha’ Happened?

Maybe she just should have hired Mike LaFontaine of High-Class Management to run her pseudocampaign in the first place. Here is a rough time-line of how things went last night:

7 p.m. or thereabouts: The New York Post reports she has told Governor David Paterson that she is withdrawing her name from consideration for the Senate seat being vacated by Hillary Clinton. It says she is citing “personal reasons.”

Within an hour, the New York Times is following with a story confirming that, but saying that her reason is concern over her Uncle Ted Kennedy’s health–a reason that does not entirely make sense because (1) she has known her uncle’s diagnosis since last May and (2) her uncle has made no secret of the fact that he wants very badly to see her in the Senate.

Meanwhile, the NY Post is revising its story to say that she withdrew because she found out she wasn’t getting the job. At this point, it is beginning to look like this whole story is coming out of the Paterson operation, and that she is getting pushed.

7:59 p.m.: Normally clued-in Kennedy people seem to have been caught flat-footed by all of this. Typical e-mail I got from one of them: Don’t know anything Others are insisting it isn’t true. Meanwhile, CNN confirming it. And the New York Daily News has a story up that, while “confirming” it, also quotes sources denying it. The NYDN report includes such circular sourcing as:

A family source said cousin Kerry Kennedy spoke with both Paterson and Caroline Kennedy’s political consultant, Josh Isay, and neither was aware she was bowing out.

and

Paterson, the source said, told Kerry Kennedy “he hasn’t heard it and he’s made no decision that would provoke her to leave.” Another member of Kennedy’s political inner circle said Kennedy had not told the governor she was pulling out nor have family members be told anything like that

8:40 p.m.: We hear that Kennedy’s advisers have just finished a very chaotic conference call. One source says even Josh Isay, her top strategist (at this point, obviously, we are using that word very loosely), is claiming not to know anything about any decision of hers to drop out.

8:59 p.m.: Swampland commenter rmrd tells us: Olbermann just said Kennedy did not bow out

10:02 p.m.: Swampland commenter Pourmecoffee (yes, we’ve got the whole team working on this) informs us of this mystifying update to the NYT story:

Just before 7 p.m. Wednesday, Errol Cockfield, Mr. Paterson’s press secretary, said the governor had referred to the assertion that Ms. Kennedy was withdrawing as “just the rumor of the day.” More than an hour later, Mr. Cockfield asked that that statement not be published, but neither he nor the governor’s communications director, Risa B. Heller, would respond to questions about Ms. Kennedy.

10:15 p.m.: I go to bed.

10:56 p.m.: AP moves this:

ALBANY, N.Y. (AP) Source: Caroline Kennedy remains in contest to fill Hillary Clinton’s NY Senate seat. (Corrects APNewsAlert with source saying Kennedy had withdrawn.)

11:30 p.m.: NYT reporters are told she is preparing a statement reasserting her interest in the job, and they are read a draft:

I remain interested in the possibility of serving in the U.S. Senate.

12:07 a.m.: This statement by Caroline Kennedy arrives by email:

“I informed Governor Paterson today that for personal reasons I am
withdrawing my name from consideration for the United States Senate.”

POSTSCRIPT: Not that we didn’t see this coming.

Related Topics: Uncategorized
  • Latest on Swampland

    Pete Souza / The White House via Getty Images

    Political Picures of the Week, May 18-25

    TIME’s photo editors bring you the best pictures of the past week from the Beltway and beyond.

    Obama Administration Blocks Global Health Fund To Fight Disease In Developing NationsHuffPost Politics

    From left: AP; ABACAUSA

    The Phony War: Obama and Romney Are Debating Character, Not Policy

    More than five months from Election Day, the back-and-forth about Mitt Romney’s record at Bain already feels played out. Unfortunately, there’s good reason to expect the campaign continues in this vein indefinitely. Neither Barack Obama nor Mitt Romney are terribly interested in dwelling on policy platforms. Romney’s plan to slash spending and keep taxes low on the wealthy isn’t especially popular, at least not at any level of detail beyond a blithe promise to shrink the deficit. Meanwhile, Obama’s signature first-term achievements, like health care, the stimulus and Wall Street reform, are all unpopular or tricky to sell. (The Dodd-Frank bill is the most popular of these, but hyping it means offending wealthy donors.) So what we’re getting instead is a superficial duel about character–and, worse, one that’s based on the largely false premise that the better man can better “manage” the economy back to health.

  • Paul-no not that one

    Boy do I feel better about Minnesota’s orderly process.

  • Karen Tumulty

    Swampland commenters should all put in for stringer reporting fees from the High Sheriffs.

  • http://phd9.blogspot.com Paul Dirks

    Just another example of how bizarre the relationship between pols and press has gotten. Unfounded speculation on whether a candidate for appointment jumped or was pushed, AOK. Well sourced evidence that top administration officials were complicit in war crimes, well lats just mull that one over until they’re safely out of office….
    .
    (Note that I’m aware I’m being hyperbolic. After all, if the war-crime story were completely quashed, I wouldn’t be in a position to comment on it….)

  • http://pourmecoffee.blogspot.com pourmecoffee

    I stand by my original statement: Caroline Favre.

  • gysgt213

    OT:How do we hold thee accountable?
    .
    A group of high-ranking dairy company executives and middlemen were sentenced by a Chinese court on Thursday to long jail terms, life in prison and, for three individuals, the death penalty for endangering public safety last year by selling and producing tainted milk products, according to the state-run news media.
    .
    http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/23/world/asia/23milk.html?hp
    .
    What does this country do to people who endangered the lives of our troops? I think bonuses were involved.
    .
    http://www.cnn.com/2008/US/05/28/soldier.electrocutions/index.html
    .
    http://www.armytimes.com/news/2008/12/military_kbr_lawsuit_121508w/

  • destor23

    Caroline Kennedy does this EVERY time she applies for a job. Which might explain her thin resume…

  • newfloridian

    Like Paterson’s horrible sense of timing apparently Kennedy is also afflicted with a similar lack of recognition virus. Let’s just call it the Politico Oblivious Virus or POV for short. A virus which exhibits such traits as not understanding timing, when to get in- when to get out, not being able to make a prompt decision, not understanding that your constituents are tiring of you, etc. etc. etc.

    Like Paterson, Kennedy has waited too long to make her exit. When it all did not happen in a few weeks she should have exited, cited Paterson’s POV symptoms and moved on.

    But hey we still have Gov. Palin to kick around, now she’s trying to stay relevant by attacking the press for supposedly attacking her children. She too suffers from POV. When you parade around your family and wear them like a campaign button… guess what they get srutinized. She apparently is oblivious to the need for new press stories or something.

  • bitterpill8

    Bizarre. Ms Kennedy certainly hasn’t shown us the so-called Kennedy smarts. That Ted is ailing is an odd reason for getting out. As for the journos: this hasn’t been their finest hour, has it?

  • constantweader

    I guess we’d call that a “Profile in Confusion.” And I thought Kennedy had such potential. Evidently, the Senate is no place for ordinary Kennedys.

    The Constant Weader at http://www.RealityChex.com

  • http://pourmecoffee.blogspot.com pourmecoffee

    So, I wonder, when did she call Paterson and what was the conversation? Did she say “I’m leaning no because of Teddy?” Or, did he say, “I’m leaning no because you are teh suck?” And, did they decide to sleep on it but someone from the Governor’s office or Kennedy clan leaked? The one thing I can’t believe, and maybe it’s just because I’m not knowledgeable, is the meme that the Governor could leak that she dropped out to “put her in a box.” Can you really just say something that absolutely didn’t happen? That seems pretty over the top to me. I’m guessing the “Leaning One Way + Sleep On It + Leaking Aide (ick)” call, but of course I’m just having fun guessing.

  • plukasiak

    PMC…
    My guess is that Patterson decided who to replace Hillary with, and notified someone in the Kennedy camp that she wasn’t it to give her a chance to bow out gracefully. That Kennedy person leaked to the media (perhaps 2nd or third hand) before the information got to Kennedy and her entourage. So everyone around Kennedy was denying because they didn’t know, while Patterson’s office denied it because this was supposed to be graceful.

    *****
    newfloridian, I don’t think there is anything wrong with Patterson’s timing — this whole thing is Kennedy’s fault. Had she not so publicly sought the seat, the decision would not have gotten anywhere near the kind of attention it has, so Patterson needs the whole thing to be a fait accompli, rather than giving the NY media weeks to create controversies surrounding the person he picks.

  • http://smoothlikeremy.blogspot.com/ sgwhiteinfla

    The worst and I mean absolute worst part of this story is that the National Enquirer New York Post broke it. Now the talking heads are gonna treat them like a credible source going forward.

  • alaskanturkey

    Karen, you just made my day with that Mike LaFontaine quote.
    .
    Maybe Paterson paid her to withdrawl with a weal wed wagon.

  • kathy

    RFK Jr. on Morning Joe said he hadn’t talked with Caroline since she withdrew, but that she was very affected by Ted’s collapse Tuesday.
    .
    That is believable if unusual. Caroline may have been picturing herself in the senate with Teddy, and may have realized that might be a very short-term thing, and that she would still be a senator for 2 years even if Ted wasn’t there.
    .
    She wouldn’t be the first person who thought a job sounded terrific because of the people she’d be working with and who tried to talk her into it, who thought better of it when the work cadre changed.

  • stuartzechman

    This whole thing doesn’t make the principles look bad, it makes political reporting look bad.
    .
    At this point, somebody on the journo side needs to rethink the effect that un-named source rumor mill tabloidism has on their credibility…
    .
    Put people’s names in print, and ultimately they’ll tend to tell you the truth.
    .
    Allow people the luxury of repeating falsehoods, conjecture and hearsay anonymously, and you’ll get burned.
    .
    At least this was about stupid Kennedy gossip, and not, say, a case for war involving weapons of mass destruction…

  • Andy from MA

    KT — Thanks to you and the Swampland commenters for following this story. This speaks volumes about how it appears the media gets out ahead fo the story before the story happens. I’m reminded of the Reagan shooting when ABCs Frank Reynolds who was told by producers that Reagan Press Secreatry Brady had died at Walter Reed when he had, in fact, not. Reynolds pounding the desk “let’s nail this down” is one of my most memorable moments in broadcast journalism.
    .
    Today’s media about getting it out first regardless of whether it’s accurate. KT, I thought you managed this very well here on the blog last night.
    .
    I don’t think we’ll ever know the true chronology, but it’s up to media management to set higher standards about naming sources if they are going with a story, rather than solely relying on unnamed sources. I know KT will probably comeback with unnamed sources are important, and they are, but some stories require you to use named the sources. This story is a good illustration of that.
    .
    This about judgment and leadership by editors and management. It’s not about poor reporting.

  • rose83

    She is making Hillary Clinton’s campaign look like it was run by David Plouffe.
    .
    I think you have a certain responsibility when you’ve run what is essentially a campaign, with aides and endorsements, to not withdraw in response to a tragic but completely predictable event. And of course no one would have criticized her for taking a few days off to be with her uncle, like Obama did with his grandmother in the GE. That said, I doubt she withdrew. It seems more like she was pushed, or that she’s searching for a way to save face.

  • FlownOver

    Still, it would have been nice to have one senator who shied from the spotlight.

  • Karen Tumulty

    Flownover: Um, no. Politicians should not shy from the spotlight. Politics sort of IS the spotlight. And as I said in an earlier post, it would have been good for Paterson to appoint a caretaker and then let Caroline prove herself in an actual campaign.
    .
    http://swampland.blogs.time.com/2009/01/15/re-caroline-kennedy/

  • queencersei

    I don’t think Paterson is doing himself any favors by dragging this out. Wasn’t he supposed to make his announcement on who was getting the seat on Tuesday? He needs to just pick someone already.

  • sacredh

    The entire episode has been FUBAR right from the start. Everyone involved has played their part. Curb You Enthusiasm had a better script. They may have been relying on subtle signals to send messages, but it appears that subtle didn’t work. They remind me of Garret Morris on SNL when he was playing the part of the “signer” for the deaf. He’d cup his hands around his mouth and shout. The effect has been the same.

  • FlownOver

    KT: I think you misconstrue my intent. To clarify, it would be nice to have a senator whose primary objective was something other than attention and self-aggrandizement. So many of them see the spotlight as the objective rather than a necessary concomitant of the position.

  • http://smoothlikeremy.blogspot.com/ sgwhiteinfla

    Hot damn we have progress!
    .
    http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/documents/postpoll011709.html
    .
    35a. (HALF SAMPLE) Do you think the Obama administration should or should not investigate whether any laws were broken in the way terrorism suspects were treated under the Bush administration?
    Should Should not No opinion
    1/16/09 50 47 2
    35b. (HALF SAMPLE) Would you support or oppose Bush issuing a pardon to prevent criminal charges against anyone in the federal government who carried out his administration’s policy on the treatment of terrorism suspects?
    Support Oppose No opinion
    1/16/09 42 52 6

  • http://resurrexit.blog.lemonde.fr/2009/01/22/carine/ Carine… – President Barack Obama – Blog LeMonde.fr

    [...] Caroline Kennedy: Hey, Wha’ Happened? [...]

  • http://blogs.bostonmagazine.com/boston_daily/2009/01/22/spanning-the-web-kennedy-debacle-edition/ Spanning the Web: Kennedy Debacle Edition | Boston Daily

    [...] a more detailed background on the implosion, read Karen Tumulty’s minute by minute breakdown of the campaign’s own breakdown last night. But basically The New York Post declares Kennedy [...]

  • Dee in Columbia MD

    It seems to me this story represents a missed opportunity. Did it occur to anyone, especially those in the media, in this critical time we could use fewer professional politicians, whose unbridled ambitions produce cut throat tactics that rarely, if history is any guide, do anything beneficial for the public.
    .
    In 1994 when the GOP marketed their contract on America, the term limit component was supposed to promote a citizen government. Now, clearly I loath using the GOP as an example of anything beneficial, and I thought term limites was a misguided, I thought therir intentions were good because we get into this mess because too many people confused public service with personal power.
    .
    I know that intellectually and morally I would have a lot to offer my government, especially my experience with actually reducing red tape and streamlining bureaucratic procedures (yes Virginia it is possible for government to work and work well), but I also know that I would not be alone in having something positive to offer but not being able to survive the bloodsport that has become professional politics or the media coverage that has way too much in common with the sports section to be helpful.
    .
    What I don’t get is how much we slammed Kennedy for wanting to be a part of the new generation that gets involved in public service for the first time so that they could be part of the solution and sided so fervently with the vitriol being spewed by the professional politicians who saw her as an obstacle in their way and would stop at nothing to mow her down.
    .
    Accuse me of wagging my finger if you will James LA, But it seems to me that we got taken. We got fed the whole rich people getting away with stuff meme by the pros who only wanted to feed their own ambition. Including that Maloney woman that so many have cheered but just took one more chance to kick Caroline now that she’s down. I’m a native New Yorker and we used to have more class than that.

  • lk312

    So, does this whole episode, in which Caroline Kennedy suffered intense scrutiny for one of a hundred Senate seats, prove to Sarah Palin once and for all that the reason why the MSM and most of the country didn’t want her a heartbeat from the presidency had nothing to do with her personal wealth or social class and everything to do with her lack of abilities!!!

  • Dee in Columbia MD

    Oh please Caroline Kennedy doesn’t have anything to do with the Palin. Sara was an no-nothing idiot who barely even grqaduated from college. Kennedy is a scholar and highly intellignet woman and the inability to distinguish between the two scenarios says a lot about your ability to question understand what you read, as well as the agenda of the sources of what you read.

  • http://hotair.com/archives/2009/01/22/report-caroline-was-never-in-contention-because-of-tax-nanny-family-issues/ Hot Air » Blog Archive » Report: Caroline was never in contention because of tax, nanny, family issues

    [...] the timeline of last night’s clusterfark doesn’t convince you this is one of the weirdest ends to a [...]

  • rose83

    It seems to me this story represents a missed opportunity. Did it occur to anyone, especially those in the media, in this critical time we could use fewer professional politicians, whose unbridled ambitions produce cut throat tactics that rarely, if history is any guide, do anything beneficial for the public.
    .
    Dee, well as you know I didn’t think CK was a good choice. But I do agree that government would be helped by having more non-professional politicians. People with a track record of excellence and integrity in diverse fields are much needed in Congress. Here’s an example of someone who might have been an effective politician, if she hadn’t died at the age of 52:
    .
    When her son was almost 2, Ann returned to college. Money was tight. She collected food stamps and relied on her parents to help take care of young Barack. She would get her bachelor’s degree four years later…
    .
    She enrolled in a master’s program at the University of Hawaii to study the anthropology of Indonesia.
    .
    Indonesia is an anthropologist’s fantasyland. It is made up of 17,500 islands, on which 230 million people speak more than 300 languages. The archipelago’s culture is colored by Buddhist, Hindu, Muslim and Dutch traditions. Indonesia “sucks a lot of us in,” says fellow anthropologist and friend Alice Dewey. “It’s delightful.”
    .
    Around this time, Ann began to find her voice. People who knew her before describe her as quiet and smart; those who met her afterward use words like forthright and passionate. The timing of her graduate work was perfect. “The whole face of the earth was changing,” Dewey says. “Colonial powers were collapsing, countries needed help, and development work was beginning to interest anthropologists.”…
    .
    After three years of living with her children in a small apartment in Honolulu, subsisting on student grants, Ann decided to go back to Indonesia to do fieldwork for her Ph.D.
    .
    After her divorce, Ann started using the more modern spelling of her name, Sutoro. She took a big job as the program officer for women and employment at the Ford Foundation, and she spoke up forcefully at staff meetings. Unlike many other expats, she had spent a lot of time with villagers, learning their priorities and problems, with a special focus on women’s work. “She was influenced by hanging out in the Javanese marketplace,” Zurbuchen says, “where she would see women with heavy baskets on their backs who got up at 3 in the morning to walk to the market and sell their produce.” Ann thought the Ford Foundation should get closer to the people and further from the government, just as she had.
    .
    Her home became a gathering spot for the powerful and the marginalized: politicians, filmmakers, musicians and labor organizers. “She had, compared with other foundation colleagues, a much more eclectic circle,” Zurbuchen says. “She brought unlikely conversation partners together.”

  • tonec31

    whatever the reason,we need to get away from this camelot stuff,either she was or wasn,t qualified for the job

  • http://forums.somd.com/politics/167583-teddy-s-circle-upset-caroline-s-awkward-exit.html#post3545605 Teddy’s Circle Upset by Caroline’s Awkward Exit – Southern Maryland Community Forums

    [...] first reports that Caroline Kennedy had withdrawn her name came early Wednesday evening, and they touched off a frenzied effort by her camp to deny it. Her terse statement, issued shortly after midnight, cited unspecified "personal reasons" [...]

  • camillaboy

    She wasn’t up for the job. I could tell be the interviews she gave.

blog comments powered by Disqus