In the Arena

Obama on This Week

I thought Barack Obama gave a strong, confident performance on This Week with George Stephanopoulos this morning–especially when you remember how halting and cautious he could be in these interview settings during the campaign. The guy has grown. So far as I could tell, there was nothing “eye-popping” in the interview, to use his phrase (in reference to the secrets he’d learned in his intelligence briefings). He stuck to positions that he maintained throughout the campaign, even when it came to examples of programs he would cut–like the subsidy to private insurers who take on medicare patients. 

Beyond that, the striking thing about the interview was this: he closed no doors. He didn’t even say that he wouldn’t fund the museum of organized crime in Las Vegas–although he did make it clear that there would be other, higher priorities. Another door he didn’t close: prosecuting the Bush Administration for the cornucopia of misdeeds that occurred over the past eight years–although, again, he made it clear that he would be focused on the future and such prosecutions would be highly unlikely. He remained vague on the Middle East–a sure sign, I believe, that his policy would be different from Bush’s, putting greater pressure on Israel to move toward a Gaza cease fire. But we’ll see. Only nine more days to wait now.

By the way: You’ve got to wonder what planet Jennifer Rubin is living on. These terrible troubles that she describes as buffeting Obama seem pretty small potatoes to me. This is irresponsible press strategy 101: Anytime anyone raises an objection–Dianne Feinstein on Leon Panetta’s CIA appointment–it is described as a “crisis”. (Some crisis: Feinstein was supporting Panetta within 24 hours.) Rubin is a right-wing propagandist, so she has a stake in Obama’s failure, but I’ve seen plenty of similar behavior among more mainstream journalists desperate to gin up a story. Remember when the Blagojevich scandal was the first “crisis” of his transition? For those of us who lived through Bill Clinton’s truly disastrous transition, Obama’s has been remarkably well run. (I suspect that Bill Richardson’s perfidy during the vetting process won’t even be a footnote in history.)

There will be crises ahead, real ones. Obama will screw up from time to time; no doubt, he’ll screw up big time on something or other. I can’t think of a President who didn’t. (This in contrast to George W. Bush who screwed up big time on practically everything.) But he hasn’t made any telling mistakes yet. Indeed, Obama’s palliative response to the mild skepticism of a few legislators this week regarding the stimulus package seems an excellent indicator that he knows how the sausage-making will work. A fearless prediction: Obama will get his massive stimulus through Congress within a month or so. Another fearless prediction: The Pajamas Media brigades, led by Ms. Rubin, will locate an Obama crisis every three days in perpetuity. One hopes that cooler media heads will prevail. Given the enormous problems facing the country, it’s time for people on my side of the notepad to focus on the steak, not the sizzle.

David Broder, who should know better, sounds positively Rubinesque in this column. A shame.

Related Topics: Uncategorized
  • Latest on Swampland

    Pete Souza / The White House via Getty Images

    Political Picures of the Week, May 18-25

    TIME’s photo editors bring you the best pictures of the past week from the Beltway and beyond.

    Obama Administration Blocks Global Health Fund To Fight Disease In Developing NationsHuffPost Politics

    From left: AP; ABACAUSA

    The Phony War: Obama and Romney Are Debating Character, Not Policy

    More than five months from Election Day, the back-and-forth about Mitt Romney’s record at Bain already feels played out. Unfortunately, there’s good reason to expect the campaign continues in this vein indefinitely. Neither Barack Obama nor Mitt Romney are terribly interested in dwelling on policy platforms. Romney’s plan to slash spending and keep taxes low on the wealthy isn’t especially popular, at least not at any level of detail beyond a blithe promise to shrink the deficit. Meanwhile, Obama’s signature first-term achievements, like health care, the stimulus and Wall Street reform, are all unpopular or tricky to sell. (The Dodd-Frank bill is the most popular of these, but hyping it means offending wealthy donors.) So what we’re getting instead is a superficial duel about character–and, worse, one that’s based on the largely false premise that the better man can better “manage” the economy back to health.

  • 53_3

    First order of business on January 20th:
    .
    Call Reid and Durbin to the White House, and kick their asses!
    .
    Once accomplished, Harry Reid will start acting like a Democrat and do what a majority leader is supposed to do:
    .
    Facilitate the Presidents’ agenda in congress.

  • Jim, Foolish Literalist

    Joe, I couldn’t agree more that rumors of the demise of the Obama administration are grossly exaggerated, but I don’t know why you’re picking on Pajamas Media. Your sainted hero, the Irreproachable Dowager Broder, wrote the same thing two days ago.
    *
    http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/01/09/AR2009010902354.html?hpid=opinionsbox1
    *
    No surprise to those of us who see the world through a different lens than Villagers’ CW that Broder and the rightwing cranks who employ “Joe The Plumber” as a foreign correspondent are largely in agreement.

  • bitterpill8

    Agree: the Pajamas gang and J Rubin will spend a lot of time being whingy and windy. Guantanamo and Israel-Palestine will be getting attention: even if not direct I see signals that the status quo ante will not remain for long. Hillary Clinton may well end up carrying the load on both. George Will and Newt did not disappoint: idiots! Friedman: does this guy have an original idea. Noonan: what is she taking for all those flights of fancy? One of the worst panels for some time.

  • James, Los Angeles

    .
    Rubin is a right-wing propagandist, so she has a stake in Obama’s failure, but I’ve seen plenty of similar behavior among more mainstream journalists desperate to gin up a story.
    .
    Does the name Politico ring any bells for you? Those gossiping fishwives are badly in need of a couple of *real* journalists to show them the way.
    .

  • http://pourmecoffee.blogspot.com pourmecoffee

    The thrill of seeing a smart and serious man at the helm is being overshadowed by the depth and breadth of the challenges he faces.
     
    Is there anything Bush didn’t break and leave for Obama to put back together?

  • vwcat

    thank you, Joe, for talking about the journalists who are so obsessed with ginning up rather everyday news.
    The Blago was just another corrupt pol. One of many over the years. And yet, these people acted like it was the biggest story of their career. And are still obsessing.
    Where were they when it came to the Bush crimes and misdeeds? Asleep or busy rolling over for him and his party? Where were the screaming headline and 24/7 cable nonstop talking about whatever crime Bush was committing.
    Even when a few good journalists did their job and came out with important information about what Bush was doing, most of the rest ignored it and it never got out to the public.
    Oh, but a little known corrupt Gov gets arrested for corruption and it’s full steam ahead! Weeks of insinuations about Obama and smearing the man’s character. Nice.
    We can see what the next 4 years will bring in midst of the numerous and urgent problems Obama has to deal with. Many that could have been stopped if the traditional media stopped playing poodle for George and did their job.

  • middlegirl

    Ditto with James and his apt description of the “gossiping fishwives” of Politico. They are the new Drudge without the sirens. Unfortunately,I’ve seen many of your colleagues follow Politico’s chicken littleism tone. Politico is somewhat transparent in their political agenda to undermine Obama when they can. Other MSM journalists may not have a partisan agenda but are addicted to sensationalism at the expense of substance. I give you a lot of credit for resisting those impulses.

  • dunedweller

    “The guy has grown.”

    Actually, he’s always had the depth and intellect to express what he did today, but he communicates so effectively that he is able to wear multiple hats. He’s gone from communicating as a candidate, to communicating as a PE in transition, and in 9 days he will communicate to us as a leader. His message hasn’t changed.

  • James, Los Angeles

    .
    The Blago was just another corrupt pol. One of many over the years. And yet, these people acted like it was the biggest story of their career. And are still obsessing.
    Where were they when it came to the Bush crimes and misdeeds? Asleep or busy rolling over for him and his party?

    .
    Bush’s crimes weren’t a fun and entertaining story, and the beltway journos didn’t lovelovelove that story. They lovelovelove the Blago story. They revel in their entertainment, which they inflict upon the rest of us only because they have a national platform. They end up writing this stuff for their own entertainment, and for the entertainment of their Beltway colleagues, leaving us readers in the national audience out in the cold.
    .
    Someday after they retire or are otherwise unemployed, maybe they will ask themselves whether what they did in their career was ever very important and meaningful. Because, with respect to political journos, I can’t see, personally, how they are actually contributing much that is useful. But, leave them to have their fun!
    .
    Have you read this piece of journo criticism: In the Crisis, the Journal Falls Short : CJR? It’s an excellent piece and the criticism there applies more widely to the way Beltway journalism covered the Bush Administration. They all fell short, on their hamster-like little wheels, entertaining themselves mainly with trivia. I’d say the only thing they did well, as a profession, these past 8 years, was in their coverage of the first six days of Katrina. A catastrophe. I place the major part of the blame on the managing editors.
    .

  • wvng

    Darn. I was going to say what JamesLA said, but he already said it. This, I mean: Bush’s crimes weren’t a fun and entertaining story, and the beltway journos didn’t lovelovelove that story. They lovelovelove the Blago story. They revel in their entertainment, which they inflict upon the rest of us only because they have a national platform. They end up writing this stuff for their own entertainment, and for the entertainment of their Beltway colleagues, leaving us readers in the national audience out in the cold.
    .
    Kudos to Joe again for taking on media stupidity, even if it’s faux media like the PJs crowd. Question: when your stablemate Halperin commits the same stupidity (he will, you know), what will you do?

  • stuartzechman

    Commentariat:
    .
    I have plenty of problems with Joe Klein, his methods and his ideology (Centrism), but he’s doing something valuable that his colleagues are revoltingly reluctant to do: he links to his examples of bad punditry, and refers to those with whom he disagrees by name. This is an important step forward for him, and we should be applauding. He’s breaking Village rules by doing so, and it’s actually quite shocking, even more so when the incompetence highlighted is that of the perpetually silly old Broder. Remember this flawless piece of political wisdom in the Washington Post?
    .

    Bush Regains His Footing
    .
    By David S. Broder
    .
    Friday, February 16, 2007; Page A23
    .
    It may seem perverse to suggest that, at the very moment the House of Representatives is repudiating his policy in Iraq, President Bush is poised for a political comeback. But don’t be astonished if that is the case.
    .
    …just as Clinton did in the winter of 1995, Bush now shows signs of renewed energy and is regaining the initiative on several fronts.
    .
    More important, he is demonstrating political smarts that even his critics have to acknowledge.
    .
    His reaction to the planned House vote opposing the increase he ordered in U.S. troops deployed to Iraq illustrates the point…

    .
    It seems like the height of lunacy to us, but actually holding a fellow Villager accountable for mind-boggling ineptitude is against all Beltway cocktail party circuit protocol, and Joe’s courage in this regard is shocking.

    Joe Klein:
    .
    Thanks so much for linking to those with whom you disagree, so that we may judge for ourselves whether your depictions of their arguments are accurate. It’s really helpful and honest of you!

  • kathy

    We’ve become so accustomed to Bush scandals that most of the press have convinced themselves they’re not doing their job if they’re not finding a scandal.
    .
    The crisis mode seems very similar to the campaign, when some of the press and some bloggers were prognosticating disaster for Obama if he didn’t follow their advice.
    .
    Some of the right does indeed seem to be hoping Obama will fail, and the idea of hoping for that is eye-poppingly mendacious. This would benefit anybody how? I’ll give W. a rare thank you for saying that he hoped Obama would succeed “because we all love our country” and sounding like he meant it.

  • http://smoothlikeremy.blogspot.com/ sgwhiteinfla

    WASHINGTON – The Senate’s second-in-command, Sen. Dick Durbin, said Sunday that he is moving away from resisting former Illinois Attorney General Roland Burris as President-elect Barack Obama’s successor and hopes a resolution to the disagreement will be reached soon.
    .
    For his part, Burris said he and his lawyers will be in Washington on Monday to begin paving the way for him to join the Senate. But Durbin said lawyers still need to sign off on Burris’ paperwork and review his testimony before the Illinois House, which later impeached Gov. Rod Blagojevich on corruption charges.
    .
    “I started off obviously skeptical, as all of the Democratic members did,” Durbin, D-Ill., said on “Face the Nation” on CBS. “But as time has gone on and we’ve looked closely, we want to be fair to Roland Burris. If he has the proper certification and papers, then we’re going to take one look at the process and move forward from there.”

    .
    I want my internet bucks

  • jose

    What Stuart said. Broder has been out of the loop for quite some time now.

  • http://smoothlikeremy.blogspot.com/ sgwhiteinfla
  • jose

    sq-the bucks are yours.

  • dunedweller

    Kathy:

    “
I’ll give W. a rare thank you for saying that he hoped Obama would succeed “because we all love our country” and sounding like he meant it.”

    
I hope your right, but it’s kinda hard to believe since he’s simultaneously handing Obama absolute wreckage caused by his “love” for 1% of the country, oh yea and god.

  • http://smoothlikeremy.blogspot.com/ sgwhiteinfla

    kathy
    .
    What else could he have possibly said? “I hope this darkie fails?”

  • http://smoothlikeremy.blogspot.com/ sgwhiteinfla

    http://www.ipsnews.net/news.asp?idnews=45350
    .

    WASHINGTON, Jan 9 (IPS) – Contrary to Israel’s argument that it was forced to launch its air and ground offensive against Gaza in order to stop the firing of rockets into its territory, Hamas proposed in mid-December to return to the original Hamas-Israel ceasefire arrangement, according to a U.S.-based source who has been briefed on the proposal.
    .
    The proposal to renew the ceasefire was presented by a high-level Hamas delegation to Egyptian Minister of Intelligence Omar Suleiman at a meeting in Cairo Dec. 14. The delegation, said to have included Moussa Abu Marzouk, the second-ranking official in the Hamas political bureau in Damascus, told Suleiman that Hamas was prepared to stop all rocket attacks against Israel if the Israelis would open up the Gaza border crossings and pledge not to launch attacks in Gaza.
    .
    The Hamas officials insisted that Israel not be allowed to close or reduce commercial traffic through border crossings for political purposes, as it had done during the six-month lull, according to the source. They asked Suleiman, who had served as mediator between Israel and Hamas in negotiating the original six-month Gaza ceasefire last spring, to “put pressure” on Israel to take that the ceasefire proposal seriously.
    .
    Suleiman said he could not pressure Israel but could only make the suggestion to Israeli officials. It could not be learned, however, whether Israel explicitly rejected the Hamas proposal or simply refused to respond to Egypt.
    .
    The readiness of Hamas to return to the ceasefire conditionally in mid-December was confirmed by Dr. Robert Pastor, a professor at American University and senior adviser to the Carter Centre, who met with Khaled Meshal, chairman of the Hamas political bureau in Damascus on Dec. 14, along with former President Jimmy Carter. Pastor told IPS that Meshal indicated Hamas was willing to go back to the ceasefire that had been in effect up to early November “if there was a sign that Israel would lift the siege on Gaza”

    .
    I am not 100% sure of the veracity of this report because I don’t use this source usually but if true this is pretty damming.

  • Paul-no not that one

    Broder was tittering as he teased this column during his online chat at WAPO on Friday. The currency of his opinion is next to nil outside of a shrinking beltway cocktail circuit.
    The column SZ cited is Broder’s version of Frist’s diagnosing Terry Shaivo by watching a tape and pronouncing her alert. The final, easily remembered, nail in credibility.

  • http://smoothlikeremy.blogspot.com/ sgwhiteinfla

    PNNTO
    .
    To be fair the nail came after the autopsy results came out. Have no doubt that but for that these people would still be claiming she was murdered. People here in Tampa were so pissed about it. I called in to a radio show and proposed that instead of having a living will, every conservative be presented with a real “living” will starting with Jeb Bush. In a “living” will you assert that if you are ever reduced to any vegetative state you want to stay hooked up to machines forever or until your organs fail no matter what the cost or emotional problems it poses to your family. BTW they have dug up some dirt on good ole Rick Warren and him saying Terry Schiavo’s husband may have been trying to kill her so she wouldn’t wake up and tell the police something about him.

  • grape_crush

    .
    JK: You’ve got to wonder what planet Jennifer Rubin is living on.
    .
    Hard to understand how Rubin could describe anything, considering the close-up view of her colon she has from having her head shoved up her a….I mean, if Feinstein gives a disapproving statement, then it’s game over
    .

  • Paul-no not that one

    SG, I saw that Warren quote-Digby I think-the guy is a nice, friendly, palatable tool.
    On a much nicer and off topic note I just read the Tuskeegee Airmen will ride in the Inaugural Parade.
    http://www.tuskegeeairmen.org/

  • stuartzechman

    Great analogy, PNNTO.

  • textee

    Time magazine “reporter” Nina Burleigh declared that she wanted to get on her knees and perform felatio on Boy Clinton because Clinton was such an enthusiast of abortion. Joe Klein wants to get on his knees and service the thoroughly unqualified, clueless, terrorist fraternizing, community organizer because of his mere existence.

  • ivb3016

    TeeHee, TeeHee!
    [Pointing, Laughing]

  • http://smoothlikeremy.blogspot.com/ sgwhiteinfla

    textee
    .
    You know when you think about it, fellatio might cut down on abortion. I would think you would endorse it. Yo mama does!
    .
    BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

  • Paul-no not that one

    I hope, someday, BHO will be as deeply in the “minds” of the right as the all powerful Clenis.

  • jennofark

    Apparently, Broderella thinks that Obama should have released his secret Captain America powers to step in and dictate to the courts and the Senate how to proceed in the Burris situation. Even though, you know, he doesn’t have any constitutional or legal authority in the matter whatsoever.

  • cfukara

    JK:
    ” .. I thought Barack Obama gave a strong, confident performance ..”

    Talk of carrots and sticks.
    BHO gives “a strong, confident performance ..” as long as he and the USA play a meek supporting role to the supremacist policies and terrorist actions of the foreign country Israel

    The moment BHO forgets that, then the gloves are off. [Will the people push back against the juggernaut - of the MSM and the foreigners' lobby - to assert their sovereignty?]

    I have been checking back to find out since when Joe Klein got off the fence and became a cheerleader – and a crafty, purpose-driven one – for BHO. Perhaps when an Obama presidency increasingly looked inevitable …

  • yutsano

    The right will continue to make mountains out of molehills until they bamboozle enough people to get back in charge. Remember that Republicans like to rule, not govern, and that is the fundamental philosophical difference. So it is in the right’s best interests to hammer away at even the slightest perceived error Obama commits. Rubin and Broder are simply f*rtknockers.

  • wvng

    OT, but relevant somehow. From Steve Benen: People asked, "Which moments from the last eight years do you revisit most often?" Bush, after talking about meeting with families of fallen soldiers, replied, "I think about throwing out that pitch at the World Series on [Oct. 30] 2001. My heart was racing when I got to the mound. Didn’t want to bounce it. Didn’t want to let the fans down. My heart was pumping so hard, I wasn’t sure if I could lift my arm. I never felt that anxious any other time during my presidency, curiously enough."
    .
    Steve goes on from there, as you might imagine.
    .
    Up yonder, kathy said: We’ve become so accustomed to Bush scandals that most of the press have convinced themselves they’re not doing their job if they’re not finding a scandal. Actually, my memory of the last 8 years is the press literally falling all over themselves not to report on, or to minimize, Bush scandals, many going so far (at least until Katrina) as to remark that the Bush administration was remarkably scandal free. Why, even on these swampy pages, the estimable Jay Carney pooh-poohed the US attorney firings as nothing, making fun of TPM until he could no longer credibly do so.
    .
    With the possible exception of Katrina, can anyone here name a single real Bush scandal that the press flogged nearly as much as non-scandal of Obama-Blago.
    .
    The press likes Dem scandals, so much they will make them up if there are no real ones to talk about.

  • Paul-no not that one

    jennofark, you are correct.
    From The Dean’s online chat Friday.
    .
    Virginia: “He should have come out for a new election to fill his vacated seat.”

    I’m quite shocked that you would agree with this because it is in essence against the law. Would it have even been legal to have an election when the law calls for an appointment? That’s changing the rules in the middle of the game. That it would have been changed to his disadvantage is irrelevant.

    What if Blago was a Republican and Obama called for an election to replace the appointment? The GOP would cry bloody murder, and Obama would look pretty bad. If they want to change the law for the next time there’s a vacancy, that’s fine. But don’t make up new rules. That ain’t kosher.

    David S. Broder: I understand your view, but it strikes me that the real need was to find a way for the new senator to look legitimate in the eyes of the voters, and I believe a special election would have assured that.

  • 53_3

    sg:
    .
    Textee is likely to be the last* individual on this country to understand ‘yo mama’…
    .
    .
    .
    *sort of

  • formerlyjames

    The fundamentalist right wing pundits and apologists can slice it as many ways and as frequently as they choose, but on 1/20 America and the world will celebrate the departure of the totally failed fundamentalist right wing administration, and the hope of a rational and productive one.

  • stuartzechman

    …legitimate in the eyes of the voters…
    .
    How would David S. Broder have any idea what any “voter” thinks, beyond the voters with whom he’s routinely sharing hors d’oeuvres?
    .
    Just his use of the unqualified term “voters” (with no distinction made for partisan, regional or demographic differences) demonstrates how much Broder’s perspective truly is an anachronism only fit for a 20th century time capsule.
    .
    When Broder trots out what non-existent generic “voters” are supposed to be thinking or feeling, the questions obvious to anybody familiar with US politics over the past decade would look like:
    .

    What “voters”, Dowager Broder?
    .
    Do you mean “Obama voters in Georgia”?
    .
    Do you mean “McCain voters in Miami”?
    .
    Do you mean “Hillary voters on the Upper West Side of Manhattan”?
    .
    Do you mean “2004 Bush voters in Southern Ohio”?

    .
    Who actually takes David Broder seriously, beyond publishers desperate to wring corporate branding cash out of pages opposite evidence of his miserable tenure, and fellow Villagers?

  • formerlyjames

    wvng, the baseball pitch would be funny if it wern’t so sad a commentary on this fool. He gets sweaty hands throwing a baseball, knowing that he is really a good baseball thrower. No problem with ordering the massive destruction of a country, because he doesn’t know what a crappy leader and president he is.

  • kathy

    sgwhite and dune – Bush needn’t have said anything. It was unprompted, not in response to a question. The “we” he was referring to was the four presidents, at their luncheon.
    .
    wvng – Perhaps I should modify that to say that we’ve all seemingly become so inured to the big scandals that the MSM (and, apparently the ratings would suggest, most of the populace) have chased after will-o-the-wisp scandals, which is the kind that have come out of the mists at Obama. Besides that, Obama has truly become a celebrity. So any little thing he does or doesn’t do appears fair game for coverage.
    .
    The stimulus package by comparison is boring.

  • wvng

    formerly, sad doesn’t begin touch it. But it does further confirm this quote from Lawrence Wilkerson (top aide and later chief of staff to former Secretary of State Colin Powell) regarding Cheney:
    .
    “He became vice president well before George Bush picked him. And he began to manipulate things from that point on, knowing that he was going to be able to convince this guy to pick him, knowing that he was then going to be able to wade into the vacuums that existed around George Bush – personality vacuum, character vacuum, details vacuum, experience vacuum.”

  • http://blogs.tnr.com/tnr/blogs/the_plank/archive/2009/01/11/david-broder-is-straining-credulity.aspx David Broder is Straining Credulity – The Plank

    [...] with Joe Klein on this one: If I didn't know better, I'd say David Broder was being facetious when he [...]

  • http://pacificgatepost.blogspot.com/ pacificgatepost

    Out of control spending coming to a neighborhood near your wallet.

    Republicans were trashed, deservedly so, but the Democrats got a FREE PASS on their involvement in the creation of the economic mess.

    Is that an intelligent way to run a country? Is it right that Democrats be getting off “scott free,” and will now have free reign over fixing the mess?
    – -
    http://pacificgatepost.blogspot.com/2009/01/democrat-responsibility-for-economic.html
    – -
    No feet are being held to the fire. Can we assume Madoff arrived just in time to take the brunt of it away from Congress?

    Will anything change? No chance. America is heading into the new and never before seen levels of debt. Here comes inflation.

  • http://thepage.time.com/2009/01/11/obama-on-economy-everybodys-going-to-have-to-give/ The Page – by Mark Halperin – TIME

    [...] Klein on Swampland: “I thought Barack Obama gave a strong, confident performance … especially when you remember how [...]

  • kathy

    How about this headline in Politico: “NYT Reporter warns of one-term Obama.” Evidently he’s a failure before he’s started.

  • newfloridian

    On another political note and of course this could only come out of Florida, the world’s capital of teacher on student sex:

    “Florida lawmakers have again pitched a bill that it would make it a felony to have sex with animals. This year’s bill was sponsored by Sen. Nan Rich, D-Sunrise, and Rep. William Snyder, R-Stuart.”

    Apparently in addition to teacher on student sex we also have a problem with beastality- this is from representatives who are in a special session in Florida trying to balance the budget by raiding every reserve fund they can find.

    “According to a bill analysis:

    • In January 2004, a West Palm Beach man was caught sexually battering a neighbor’s dog and was charged with animal cruelty and indecent exposure.

    • In 2005, a man in Leon County was convicted of misdemeanor disorderly conduct for sexually battering his guide dog.

    • In January 2008, a man raped a pregnant goat in a small Panhandle town, killing the animal. That man ultimately wasn’t charged because DNA tests weren’t conclusive.

    The bestiality bill doesn’t apply to “accepted animal husbandry practices or accepted veterinary medical practices,” the bill states.”

    The last paragraph of course brings up the question just what accepted animal husbandry or veterinary medical practices could be confused with beatality?

    What does this say about Florida that doesn’t make it the laughing stock of America?

    I guess down here in Florida we’re all “Hot for Teacher,” and dogs, goats and God knows what else. Only in Florida!

  • Aaron

    I know it is a cliche to ask a question one already knows the answer to, but is there any evidence whatsoever that David Broder has ever known better?

  • Dee in Columbia MD

    Aaron, there is also no definitive proof that Broder has not contributed to the mindset that has given rise to Florida’s need for a beastiality bill. Nevertheless, we will assume that he must have been at least born with some redeeming qualities.

  • FlownOver

    Too many political reporters, with or without partisan axes to grind, are compelled to stir up something just to have a “story” and retain/retain a space in the spotlight. When the reality looks like the cover of Parade many of them feel they have to amplify the smallest speed bump into an Alp.
    .
    I guess process stories are easier to write – and to overheat – than are substantive pieces on actual issues. I’d bet this irresponsibility is a primary cause for the growing negative public opinion toward trad media. Give me the Joe Friday approach any day – ”Just the facts, ma’am.”

  • http://atercricaodesites.wordpress.com/2009/01/12/the-most-popular-wordpresscom-posts-are-ranked-here-according-to-a-special-formula/ The most popular WordPress.com posts are ranked here according to a special formula. « ATer: Criação de Sites Empresa (5511) 2527-3032. Sites Dinâmicos!

    [...] Obama on This Week I thought Barack Obama gave a strong, confident performance on This Week with George Stephanopoulos this [...] [...]

  • cincinnatus est exterminata!

    “David Broder, who should know better”
    .
    Oh, yeah? Based on what exactly?
    .
    Oh, and speaking of Pajamas Media, their new Gaza War correspondent Joe the Welfare Recipient:
    “I’ll be honest with you: I don’t think journalists should be anywhere allowed war.”
    .
    That said, I still think he’s better than Broder.

  • Aaron

    “there is also no definitive proof that Broder has not contributed to the mindset that has given rise to Florida’s need for a beastiality bill”

    Sure there is; David Broder never wrote favorably about that mindset in his column in the Washington Post.

    On the other hand, he has written that claim by not mindlessly agreeing to follow John McCain’s debate plan, Barack Obama opened the door to the Republican game plan of hate and fear.

    I’ll do more more than assume that David Broder has some redeeming qualities; I know he does. Sadly, being a political commentator of substance is not one of them.

  • cincinnatus est exterminata!

    Should know better:
    .
    “Why are the Democrats raining on Bush’s parade? We’re proud of our president. Americans love having a guy as a president, a guy who has a little swagger, who’s physical . . . Women like a guy who’s president. Check it out. The women like this war. I think we like having a hero as our president.”
    -Chris Matthews

  • cincinnatus est exterminata!

    Should know better:
    .
    “Out bounded the cocky, rule-breaking, daredevil flyboy, a man navigating the Highway to the Danger Zone, out along the edges where he was born to be, the further on the edge, the hotter the intensity…This time Maverick didn’t just nail a few bogeys and do a 4G inverted dive with a MIG-28 at a range of two meters. This time the Top Gun wasted a couple of nasty regimes, and promised this was just the beginning. Mav swaggered across the deck to high-five his old gang: his wise flight instructor, Viper; his amiable sidekick, Goose; his chiseled rival, Iceman.”
    -Maureen Dowd

  • cincinnatus est exterminata!

    Should have known better:
    .
    “Of course! It all makes perfect conspiratorial sense! Except for one thing: in this case some liberals are seeing broad partisan conspiracies where none likely exist.”
    -Jay Carney
    http://swampland.blogs.time.com/2007/01/17/running_massacre/

  • shepherdwong

    “Rubin is a right-wing propagandist, so she has a stake in Obama’s failure, but I’ve seen plenty of similar behavior among more mainstream journalists desperate to gin up a story.”
    .
    I always enjoy your more lucid moments, Joe. Especially when you try to explain them to your peers.

  • http://pacificgatepost.blogspot.com/ pacificgatepost

    Obama can be given a pass for not wishing to look backward.

    The rest of the country, however, should.

    http://pacificgatepost.blogspot.com/2009/01/is-obama-right-to-ignore-bush.html

    Too many pieces of the system need fixing to let things slide.

blog comments powered by Disqus