The Blago Report

The Obama Transition Office has released the report of White House Counsel-to-be Greg Craig regarding contacts between Obama’s circle and that of disgraced Illinois Gov. Rod Blagojevich. The most interesting part (which, really, isn’t all that interesting) concerns a few conversations that future White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel had with the Governor and his Chief of Staff. In a conference call with reporters (which is currently underway), Craig said he sees “nothing at all inappropriate” in these conversations.:

Mr. Emanuel had one or two telephone calls with Governor Blagojevich. Those conversations occurred between November 6 and November 8, 2008. Soon after he decided to accept the President-Elect’s offer to serve as Chief of Staff in the White House, Mr. Emanuel placed a call to the Governor to give him a heads up that he was taking the Chief of Staff’s position in the White House, and to advise him that he would be resigning his seat in the House of Representatives. They spoke about Mr. Emanuel’s House seat, when he would be resigning and potential candidates to replace him. He also had a brief discussion with the Governor about the Senate seat and the merits of various people whom the Governor might consider. Mr. Emanuel and the Governor did not discuss a cabinet position, 501c(4), a private sector position for the Governor or any other personal benefit for the Governor.

In those early conversations with the Governor, Mr. Emanuel recommended Valarie Jarrett because he knew she was interested in the seat. He did so before learning — in further conversations with the President-Elect — that the President-Elect had ruled out communicating a preference for any one candidate. As noted above, the President-Elect believed it appropriate to provide the names of multiple candidates to be considered, along with others, who were qualified to hold the seat and able to retain it in a future election. The following week, Mr. Emanuel learned that the President-Elect and Ms. Jarrett with the President’s strong encouragement had decided that she would take a position in the White House.

Between the time that Mr. Emanuel decided to accept the position of Chief of Staff in the White House and December 8, 2008, Mr. Emanuel had about four telephone conversations with John Harris, Chief of Staff to the Governor, on the subject of the Senate seat. In these conversations, Mr. Emanuel and Mr. Harris discussed the merits of potential candidates and the strategic benefit that each candidate would bring to the Senate seat. After Ms. Jarrett removed herself from consideration, Mr. Emanuel – with the authorization of the President-Elect – gave Mr. Harris the names of four individuals whom the President-Elect considered to be highly qualified: Dan Hynes, Tammy Duckworth, Congresswoman Schakowsky and Congressman Jesse Jackson, Jr.

In later telephone conversations, Mr. Emanuel – also with the President-Elect’s approval – presented other names of qualified candidates to Mr. Harris including Attorney General Lisa Madigan and Ms. Cheryle Jackson. Mr. Harris did not make any effort to extract a personal benefit for the Governor in any of these conversations. There was no discussion of a cabinet position, of 501c(4), of a private sector position or of any other personal benefit to the Governor in exchange for the Senate appointment.

Although Mr. Emanuel recalls having conversations with the President-Elect, with David Axelrod and with Valerie Jarrett about who might possibly succeed the President-Elect in the Senate, there was no mention of efforts by the Governor or his staff to extract a personal benefit in return for filling the Senate vacancy.

Craig says, “No one in the Obama circle was aware what was going on in the Governor’s office or in the Governor’s mind until the time he was arrested.”

At another point, a union official raised with Obama adviser Valerie Jarrett an idea that Craig says she dismissed as “ridiculous”:

On November 7, 2008 — at a time when she was still a potential candidate for the Senate seat — Ms. Jarrett spoke with Mr. Tom Balanoff, the head of the Illinois chapter of the Service Employees International Union (SEIU). Mr. Balanoff is not a member of the Governor’s staff and did not purport to speak for the Governor on that occasion. But because the subject of the Governor’s interest in a cabinet appointment came up in that conversation, I am including a description of that meeting.

Mr. Balanoff told Ms. Jarrett that he had spoken to the Governor about the possibility of selecting Valerie Jarrett to replace the President-Elect. He told her that Lisa Madigan’s name also came up.

Ms. Jarrett recalls that Mr. Balanoff also told her that the Governor had raised with him the question of whether the Governor might be considered as a possible candidate to head up the Department of Health and Human Services in the new administration. Mr. Balanoff told Ms. Jarrett that he told the Governor that it would never happen. Jarrett concurred.

Mr. Balanoff did not suggest that the Governor, in talking about HHS, was linking a position for himself in the Obama cabinet to the selection of the President-Elect’s successor in the Senate, and Ms. Jarrett did not understand the conversation to suggest that the Governor wanted the cabinet seat as a quid pro quo for selecting any specific candidate to be the President-Elect’s replacement. At no time did Balanoff say anything to her about offering Blagojevich a union position.

UPDATE: Bottom line — If this is the full extent of contacts, it would appear that if Blagojevich–or anyone working on his behalf–was trying to get anything out of Obama, they were doing it awfully subtly.

Related Topics: Uncategorized
  • Latest on Swampland

    Pete Souza / The White House via Getty Images

    Political Picures of the Week, May 18-25

    TIME’s photo editors bring you the best pictures of the past week from the Beltway and beyond.

    Obama Administration Blocks Global Health Fund To Fight Disease In Developing NationsHuffPost Politics

    From left: AP; ABACAUSA

    The Phony War: Obama and Romney Are Debating Character, Not Policy

    More than five months from Election Day, the back-and-forth about Mitt Romney’s record at Bain already feels played out. Unfortunately, there’s good reason to expect the campaign continues in this vein indefinitely. Neither Barack Obama nor Mitt Romney are terribly interested in dwelling on policy platforms. Romney’s plan to slash spending and keep taxes low on the wealthy isn’t especially popular, at least not at any level of detail beyond a blithe promise to shrink the deficit. Meanwhile, Obama’s signature first-term achievements, like health care, the stimulus and Wall Street reform, are all unpopular or tricky to sell. (The Dodd-Frank bill is the most popular of these, but hyping it means offending wealthy donors.) So what we’re getting instead is a superficial duel about character–and, worse, one that’s based on the largely false premise that the better man can better “manage” the economy back to health.

  • http://smoothlikeremy.blogspot.com/ sgwhiteinfla

    I am just glad to see that Triple J’s name was in the mix after people were trying to make it seem like Obama had snubbed him and there was some kind of tension going on between the two

  • davemc321

    KT, there doesn’t seem to be a lot of there there. Do you believe this will stem the media speculation? Does this count as being forthcoming enough?

  • Karen Tumulty

    KT here–

    Dave: I think that there are still some more shoes to drop (and that’s why Fitzgerald asked the Obama team to delay releasing this), but I would be surprised at this point if those shoes drop anywhere near Obama.

  • http://smoothlikeremy.blogspot.com/ sgwhiteinfla

    Oh they are already on Hardball with Chris Matthews casting aspersions so I can only imagine whats going to happen on Bill O and Hannity’s shows. The only way this goes away is if something more interesting comes up between now and Jan 20th. The Politico guy is making himself look like such a dumb ass on MSNBC.

  • http://smoothlikeremy.blogspot.com/ sgwhiteinfla

    I should point out that they are saying that the Jarrett exchange that you posted KT is another question that needs to be answered. They just can’t understand somebody having a conversation that might have gone like this.
    .
    Balanoff: You know Rod thinks could be a an asset in Obamas Cabinet.
    .
    Jarrett: Oh really?
    .
    Balanoff: Yeah he thinks he might get the HHS job.
    .
    Jarrett: WTF is he smoking? Obama doesn’t even like him. He must have lost his damn mind lol
    .
    Blanaoff: Yeah thats the same thing I was thinking. And I tried to tell him but you know Rod’s crazy.
    .
    Is it really unheard of to think that Valarie Jarrett who was one of Obama’s closest advisors might know who he was considering for HHS or that after seeing Blago in an attack ad aimed at Obama that there was no chance he would be bringing him into his administration?
    .
    I am not even going to get mad though. I am just going to document the atrocities.

  • http://phd9.blogspot.com Paul Dirks

    Let us not forget that everyone now knows that there were wiretaps in place. This means two things. One is that we can be pretty sure that the information Obama is providing is likely to be reasonably complete. The last place he would want any new relevations to emerge is in a courtroom. The second thing is that we can speculate that the reason Fitz asked them to withhold the information is to loosen up anyone who might have been afraid that there WAS anything substantial on tape.

  • kathy

    It’s really too bad this couldn’t have been released a week ago. It’s hard to see why it needed to be held back, unless Fitzgerald didn’t want it known how little was here.
    .
    I thought I’d heard that Emanuel had conversations with staff or Blago before the election, but that’s not indicated here.

  • Dee in Columbia MD

    KT–one of the blindspots that most of your colleagues seem go share is that only the msm is capable of speculation, which is why they continue to question how blago comes to the conclusion that Obama won’t play ball without having a conversation about it. It seems obvious to the rest of us that after years of knowing how Obama operates blago would know pay to play wouldn’t fly.

  • v0te40bama

    “I would be surprised at this point if those shoes drop anywhere near Obama”

    Don’t underestimate the skills of our Press Corps. Someone will land a shoe right on top of his head unlike Iraqis.

  • Cliff

    Can you guys stop wasting our time with this sh!t now, please?

  • http://smoothlikeremy.blogspot.com/ sgwhiteinfla

    kathy
    .
    I think it came out that in the interim USA Fitzpatrick interviewed Rahm and Jarrett and that might have been the reason for the delay.

  • bitterpill8

    I saw CNN’c replacement for the Blitz Suzanne Malveaux do her level best trying to find ways to keep the story going. She got no help from Jeff Toobin. Paul Begala was in “discount this bs mode” and was surprisingly supported by the Conservative talker. On Hardball Mike Barnicle asked Jim Warren ( an Isikoff wannabee) who was looking for ways to keep the story going while Roger Simon put out the flames. What is with the MSM types that they all go into prosecutorial mode desperately trying to keep this story going? Folks there is no there, there. Move on. Enjoys Christmas and other holidays festivities. Somerby says it best: the MSM are really superb at flogging dead horses.

  • nibblybits

    kathy says: “I thought I’d heard that Emanuel had conversations with staff or Blago before the election, but that’s not indicated here.”
    .
    It was reported by the Chicago Sun-Times gossip columnist that Rahm had spoken with Blago or his team 21 times, but that was not confirmed by any other source.
    http://www.suntimes.com/news/sneed/1333057,CST-NWS-SNEED16.article

  • bitterpill8

    nibblybits: the Chicago Sun-Times has got it wrong in the past. Oops, I should not be saying that, should I?

  • http://smoothlikeremy.blogspot.com/ sgwhiteinfla

    bitter
    .
    I actually thought Simon was trying to keep the story going a little too with his “how did Valarie Jarrett know” talk. I think the conservative talking heads have gotten word from above that flogging this Blago stuff while Obama’s approval numbers are still off the charts and after the report came out which is something Bush would have never done, would end up being a losing proposition. I would be surprised if any conservatives other than those appearing on FoxNews continue to try to make hay with this. But that won’t stop the Joe Scarboroughs of the world from still flogging it.

  • http://smoothlikeremy.blogspot.com/ sgwhiteinfla

    kathy
    .
    from dailykos
    .

    Moreover, it is obvious that the Obama team would have liked to release this report long ago. It was completed on the 15th, but at the request of the U.S. Attorney was not made public until today to allow Fitzgerald’s office to complete its interviews, the last of which was conducted on the 20th.
    .

    At the request of the Office, we delayed the release of this report until such time as the interviews could be completed. The interviews took place over a period of three days: Thursday, December 18, 2008 (the President-Elect); December 19, 2008 (Valerie Jarrett); and December 20, 2008 (Rahm Emanuel

  • bitterpill8

    sgw: your response noted. Simon is not a favourite of mine, and I agree you may look at his stuff differently. The key is that this bs is not going anywhere. Thank god that Tweety was not on today: otherwise we would have got spittle inducing bs all round. To you and fellow Swamplanders: enjoy the season: Christmas, Hanukkah and whatever you do. The best. Safe travel. Great reuniuons and happy family gatherings. Next year promises to be tough.

  • nibblybits

    bitterpill: Yes, maybe I didn’t express my contempt clearly that the single source of that information was a gossip columnist. And the MSM jumped on it. As information, it should be discounted entirely.

  • formerlyrainbow68

    It appears there’s nothing to this story. Shocking.

  • http://smoothlikeremy.blogspot.com/ sgwhiteinfla

    Joe Lowery is up next on MSNBC

  • http://smoothlikeremy.blogspot.com/ sgwhiteinfla

    bitter
    .
    Happy Holidays and safe travels to you and yours as well

  • Dee in Columbia MD

    SG–I was watching Roger Simon too and you are absolutely right, hence my earlier post. There are still going to be some that try to keep this thing going for reasons that to any truly intelligent person seem self-serving at best. What is interesting to me is that the msm has witnessed a historic awakening of political participation and demand for serious engagement and despite proof if the public’s disdain for trivial distractions the press still insists on conducting itself like middle school children. We live in serious times and it demands serious people. We will soon have a government headed by grown-ups. At least the democratic leadership of Congress appears to be adult so far. I think it is high time that the press takes it’s responsibility seriously and focus on important matters of state and stop their childish preoccupation with gossip, innuendo and voyeurism.

  • http://smoothlikeremy.blogspot.com/ sgwhiteinfla

    BTW if anybody cares Joe Lowery was just on MSNBC and he said he has never said he supports gay marriage but he does support civil unions. And I dare that sanctimonious son of a beyatch John Cloud to call HIM a bigot. Seriously.

  • hellslittlestangel

    Well, now that Obama has shown himself to be an ethical and classy guy, the obstreperous turds of the right wing, and the media hacks who swarm around them like remoras on sharks, will have to redouble their efforts to take him down.

  • http://smoothlikeremy.blogspot.com/ sgwhiteinfla

    Dee
    .
    Here is the problem. The ass holes of punditry FoxNews also have the highest ratings. I have often wondered myself what that means but I can tell you this, there are some people in power at the rival networks who are saying if you can’t beat me join em hence the ass hatery. But in the end they will all lose but in the meantime the people who actually want responsible reporting are the ones losing.

  • formerlyrainbow68

    Obama’s a good guy, and those trying to take him out have egg on their faces.

  • http://smoothlikeremy.blogspot.com/ sgwhiteinfla

    that should have been beat em

  • bitterpill8

    sgw: thanks. I am heading out (we are) for a family reunion so I will be road bound in an hour. I forgot to wish Karen, Joe, Michael and Jay :season’s greetings to you and yours. So to the Time gang and all: see you all in four days when my wife will permit access to the in-laws computer!!!! Pray for me in my deprivation, sgw.

  • Karen Tumulty

    KT here–

    Bitter et al: Happy holidays, Merry Christmas, or whatever is appropriate to all of you. I still think this is a great story, but not because there’s an Obama angle. I think, journalistically, the prosecution of the Governor is worthwhile in itself as a story. Plus, I wish I had the screenplay rights to the tapes. But I do wonder if Fitzgerald has anything better than this. Could it be that he wanted to delay release of this because it hurts his case against Blago?

  • kathy

    sgwhite – Mmm, I knew if was for the interviews, but it’s hard to see what there was that would have interfered with with Fitzgerald. I’d been thinking he wanted to wait until he talked to people who wouldn’t know what the report would say, but i guess you’re suggesting (Speculation alert!) that it was so he could interview Jarrett and Emanuel before they committed to the public what they had and hadn’t said.

  • kathy

    KT – what intrigues me in this is how effective (in the short term, at least) brazen denial can be. Blagojevich has no support from any quarter, but he’s not going to resign and now Fitzgerald has asked the Assembly not to look into the criminal matters. So how are they going to impeach? what to do.
    .
    In fact, there seems to be much more speculation about Obama than there has been about Blagojevich. Where are the breathless stories about what else Blagojevich has done? Some of the very same outlets decrying Obama’s lack of transparency have run stories asking “Did Blagojevich really do anything illegal.” Go figure

  • Karen Tumulty

    Kt here–

    Kathy: I’ve been dialing around to lawyers on the bribery statutes. They are very broad, so that even the kind of trash talk we heard in the complaint might constitute a crime. You don’t need to have actually succeeded at bribing someone.

  • Art Pepper

    KT – I don’t think anyone denies the Blagojevich story itself is newsworthy. It’s certainly juicy enough. What’s stupid are the stories asking why Obama complied with the prosecutor’s request not to comment.
    -
    Happy holidays!

  • Dee in Columbia MD

    happy holidays to all and KT if you are into making Xmas wishes come true please try to understand that the problem we have with the msm stems from an inability to distinguish between following an interesting story and trying to make a story more relevant than it otherwise would be by trying to link it to Obama. All I want for Xmas is a msm worthy of the first amendment right by rising above the status quo.

  • http://smoothlikeremy.blogspot.com/ sgwhiteinfla

    Happy Holidays to all and may you have a safe holidays. Im out.

  • JJ

    Any chance someone could report on a real scandal (as opposed to a fake one)?

    Last Friday evening, Michael Connell, a top IT consultant to Karl Rove, the Bush administration and the Republican National Party died when his single-engine plane crashed into a vacant house in Ohio. No one else was on board. Connell, Rove’s IT guru, created the alternate email system for the White House — the one about which the Bush administration claims an untold number of emails were destroyed — and was set to testify as a key witness in a lawsuit claiming fraud in the 2004 Presidential Election in Ohio, in which he was alleged to have helped electronically flip votes.

    It is Tuesday morning, four days after Connell’s plane fell from the sky. What could possibly be the mainstream media’s justification for so conspicuously ignoring a story of this magnitude?

    …Investigative journalist Larisa Alexandrovna has since gone public that Connell was a major source in her investigation into the email system he set up and related matters. Pertaining to the “destroyed” White House emails, she said that “what Connell is alleged to have done is move these files to other servers after having allegedly scrubbed the files from all “known” Karl Rove accounts.”

    Alexandrovna also wrote, “I have reason to believe that the alternate accounts were used to communicate with US Attorneys involved in political prosecutions, like that of Don Siegelman” and “Mike was getting ready to talk. He was frightened.”

    …19 Action News in Cleveland reported that Connell “was apparently told by a close friend not to fly his plane because his plane might be sabotaged.” Calling Connell’s death “untimely,” 19 Action News reporter Blake Chenault also reported, “And twice in the last two months Connell, who is an experienced pilot, cancelled two flights because of suspicious problems with his plane.”

    Connell was allegedly a linchpin in the biggest maze of White House scandal this country’s ever seen, yet the national news media is a no-show.

  • gysgt213

    It is way too interesting that the Bush administration has destroyed the reputation of every federal agency that exists in our government and American’s reputation around the world along with it and we have a press that is by in large very uninterested in finding out the who, what, why and when.
    .
    But the really sad and uncomfortable truth is that this is not entirely the fault of the press. Because the other way too interesting thing is that way too many of us in this nation are willing to accept not knowing. We are a soundbite, fast food and quick fix nation. And we are really adversed to real pain.
    .
    That’s why I personally think we can so easily send kids we don’t know off to fight wars simply because we are afraid and we so easily spend our children’s money (who aren’t even born yet) on bailouts with no questions asked.
    .
    We don’t want to know the answers and we certainly are not willing to accept responsibility for our own actions. We were here during the last 8 years folks. We are actual witnesses to the crap that went down. And we know full well that from the invasion of Iraq to Katrina, crimes were committed in our names and with our consent. Crimes we are complicit in. Crimes our leaders both democratic and republican were complict in.
    .
    A really painful truth is though, holding people accountable for these crimes will mean holding our favorite democrat or republican and even ourselves accountable for that complicity. Do we as a nation have the stones for that? I mean we always like to claim we are the greatest nation on earth. I think a truly great nation would.

  • rose83

    The only thing that reflects badly on Obama or his team is the recommendation of Jesse Jackson Jr. Fortunately no one gives a d–n about sexism or unfairly accusing the Clintons of racism, so there won’t be any political consequences.

    It is interesting to imagine an alternate scenario in which HRC won and she recommended Ferraro for her Senate seat… My guess is the rich white men in the media would be a little less forgiving of Ferraro’s prejudiced outburst.

  • thegovernut

    rose 38. Ferraro’s statement was not her’s. She was quoting Obama himself. The interview is on his senate web site. He said: “If I was white, I would not have a book deal, have all this attention. I would be just one of nine freshmen senators.”

    That was unfair to Ferraro.

  • FlownOver

    Media 101:
    .
    There’s no evidence of anything wrong, so we’ll make a continuing story from the failure to disprove any and all misconduct – even if none exists and we have no evidence to the contrary. Then we’ll take as “proof” – of something, anything – the failure to disprove loudly enough or extensively enough or soon enough to knock down (in our subjective view) our continuing non-story. If we didn’t harp on this we’d have to do actual work.
    .
    The reason Big Media may be headed over the cliff is that this sort of crap vaporizes decades of built-up credibility, and leaves nearly every “reporter” (present company excepted) on the same low level. When you can’t tell the tinfoil hatters from the traditional “working press” every site becomes the Weekly World News and no source has any particular value. Nobody cares if one fails, because some other equally inconsequential “news” organ is ready to fill the gap.
    .
    Oh, and HappyMerry HolidaysChristmas, whichever you prefer.

  • acidj

    When the right inevitably makes more heavy weather out of this, will it be OK to stop treating them like a legitimate political party with interests that matter to anyone? Please?

  • shepherdwong

    “I think, journalistically, the prosecution of the Governor is worthwhile in itself as a story.”

    So how do you feel about the fact that you are, journalistically, nearly alone among your colleagues in that angle to the story (Joe Klein being another notable exception)?

    Anyway, here’s how I feel about their “angle”, as it were.

  • kathy

    KT – thanks for the info. Glad to know Blago isn’t likely to find it easy to get off the hook, even if it will take awhile.

    Dee – I think the MSM is refreshed by the thought of starting over and doing it “right.” So having gotten scandal fatigue from the Bushes they’re ready to start out making sure they investigate every little thing about Obama. The fact that this story pales in comparison to torture is beside the point. Sort of the way I used to feel at the beginning of the school year. All hope and expectation. And I love New Year’s for that reason too.

    JJ – I had seen the story about the connection to Rove, so here’s hoping there’s follow-up to the other angle if there’s anything to it.

    safe travels everyone, to you and those you love.”

  • gysgt213

    “I think, journalistically, the prosecution of the Governor is worthwhile in itself as a story.”
    .
    I guess it would be if the attention being paid to this was really about the Governor. It’s not. It’s about tying the incoming Obama administration to the Governor’s misconduct.

  • sevenoaks07

    Gunny: agree. The Governor’s misconduct will not be an issue until the Prosecutor acts. The Repubs are pushing the linkage meme and we saw how that bubbled up in things like: ” I don’t want to pre-judge Obama but…” There’s always a but. Too many folks in the MSM are windy on this subject: listen to Malveaux and Ed on CNN: you’ll get the drift.I am told Morning Joe stayed off this topic this until 8 a.m.thus far this morning. Will it last?

  • Karen Tumulty

    KT here–

    From what I’ve seen this morning of the two papers that come into my house, the NYT and the Wash Post played it pretty straight (and WP put it on Page 3). I think that most of the objections I’m reading here are about the cable yakkers in a slow news week. I was on CNN last night, and didn’t sense (at least in the segment that I was on) anyone was blowing it out of proportion.

  • gysgt213

    sevenoaks-I have Morning Joe on this morning because I’m off and really in the mood to make myself stupid. Brian Williams was on earlier and it really was interesting to see just how truly fearful the established press is of citizen journalism.
    .
    Brian was bemoaning the loss of newspapers and how the country should be fearful of losing what he seemed to consider as journalistic integrity. How bloggers just simply can’t be trusted to pick up the phone, to investigate and do their research. He made no mention of course of the fail business model that is actually causing the loss of newspapers and he made no mention of his and his colleagues own loss of integrity and trust.
    .
    Brian made no mention of the press’ abysmal conduct throughout the 90′s to their pimping of the Clintons trashed the White House story, to WMD, to Iraq, to rendition, to torture, to invasion of privacy, to the retired generals pimping for the Pentagon, to Katrina (by the way where all the stories out of Galvenston that proved that FEMA has not gotten better since Kartina, Brian?), to the fired attorney generals, to Plame, failure to actually cover McCain, to the pimping of stocks, to the bailout. Talk about failure to do research.

  • http://smoothlikeremy.blogspot.com/ sgwhiteinfla

    KT
    .
    It seems at least some folks have a problem with at least one of Bush’s pardons. Did you hear about this guy?

  • sevenoaks07

    KT: I watched CNN from 4 to 5 and Suzanne Malveaux had Begala and a Conservative TH. They both appeared pretty low key in spite of five attempts by Malveaux to coax a ” but we need to… This morning Vogel and Burdoff in Politico did not surprise: lots of questions and the usual doubts. SOP. And KT: to you, Joe, Michael and Jay N-S and your families : Seasons Greetings. A special thanks to you, KT for engaging. Much appreciated.

    Gunny: I have never found Brian Williams relaxed. He gives off an air of being seriously preoccupied about profound issues. Sometimes it comes off a a pose. Need I say more?

    To you and fellow commenters: Seasons Greeting, take care and safe travel.

  • http://www.luxlibertas.com/the-note-122408-open-christmas-report-won%e2%80%99t-be-last-word-on-obama-blago-contacts/ The Note, 12/24/08: Open Christmas — Report Won’t be Last Word on Obama-Blago Contacts | Lux Libertas – Light and Liberty

    [...] “Bottom line — If this is the full extent of contacts, it would appear that if Blagojevich–or anyone working on his behalf–was trying to get anything out of Obama, they were doing it awfully subtly,” Time’s Karen Tumulty writes. [...]

  • Andy from MA

    Gunny, “journalistic integrity” if that isn’t an oxymoron, I don’t know what is. You mention Brian Williams and journalism in the same sentence. That’s like mentioning Hannibal Lechter and gourmand in the same sentence.

  • Karen Tumulty

    SG–Great minds…

    See my post above this one.

  • gysgt213

    “I think that most of the objections I’m reading here are about the cable yakkers in a slow news week.”
    .
    Yes. You are so right a slow news week and cable yakkers go hand and hand. I remember those other slow news weeks when the cable yakkers all went to McCain’s ranch for some deliciously rubbed BBQ or the when the cable yakkers all chipped in for some coffee and sprinkle donuts. I remember with great fondness all the cable yakkers sitting on the back of the bus at McCain’s knee. Bunch of cards those cable yakkers.

  • shepherdwong

    “I think that most of the objections I’m reading here are about the cable yakkers in a slow news week. I was on CNN last night, and didn’t sense (at least in the segment that I was on) anyone was blowing it out of proportion.”
    .
    Three weeks of putting the words “Obama” and “Blagojevich” together in the same sentence is blowing it completely out of proportion, since they had practically no relationship with one another and the President-elect was obviously uninvolved in Blago’s scandal. This was another clear cut case of journalistic malpractice against a Democrat (it’s getting to be a rather impressive list) and you’d be more credible if you simply said so.
    .
    Oh, and Merry Christmas, Karen.

  • Art Pepper

    Kathy: “The fact that this story pales in comparison to torture is beside the point.”
    -
    I’m starting to think that actually is the point. It’s almost as if the Bush scandals were simply too big for our pale shadow of a press to grapple with.
    -
    Maybe reporters don’t want to believe the country has fallen so far, or perhaps it’s simply too hard to speak truth to power. But the triviality of the Blago reporting seems, somehow, perfectly consistent with their overall passivity in the face of the Bush administration. (A few superb counter-examples notwithstanding.)

  • charliehorse26

    I oft times pondered where and what the “Natering Nabobs” that Agnew referred to, and lo, here they are on this blog! There are such a perponderance of you all agreeing with each other on the rudness of the press to even consider that there could be a “there” there, and the absolute purity of all the Progressive players in this drama, it is like fish in a bucket. Gads folks, get used to it, the focus of Fitzgerald is now on you!! Try to recall how long Libby and company were dangeling on his legal strings and the $$ spent to arrive at a place where the total was the differance between Russert’s memory and Libby’s of a conversation held years before. There was glee in your lives then, and the press was wonderful then. There is more to this story of Blago and Rahm, and Fitz throws a wide net.

blog comments powered by Disqus