Tom Daschle and Health Care Reform

By Karen Tumulty | November 19, 2008 | +

I’m glad I hang onto my old notebooks.

Related Topics: Uncategorized

@TIMEPolitics

Latest on Swampland

Closeup May 25, 2012

Political Picures of the Week, May 18-25

TIME’s photo editors bring you the best pictures of the past week from the Beltway and beyond.
From our Partners
Obama Administration Blocks Global Health Fund To Fight Disease In Developing NationsHuffPost Politics

The Cowardice of Colin PowellSlate
Ryan Crocker Says Cases Of Afghans Killing NATO Military Counterparts Can Be 'Personal'HuffPost Politics
2012 Election May 25, 2012

The Phony War: Obama and Romney Are Debating Character, Not Policy

More than five months from Election Day, the back-and-forth about Mitt Romney’s record at Bain already feels played out. Unfortunately, there’s good reason to expect the campaign continues in this vein indefinitely. Neither Barack Obama nor Mitt Romney are terribly interested in dwelling on policy platforms. Romney’s plan to slash spending and keep taxes low on the wealthy isn’t especially popular, at least not at any level of detail beyond a blithe promise to shrink the deficit. Meanwhile, Obama’s signature first-term achievements, like health care, the stimulus and Wall Street reform, are all unpopular or tricky to sell. (The Dodd-Frank bill is the most popular of these, but hyping it means offending wealthy donors.) So what we’re getting instead is a superficial duel about character–and, worse, one that’s based on the largely false premise that the better man can better “manage” the economy back to health.

trifecta

keeping notebooks on Daschle speeches to small groups from 15 years ago can be considered two ways. It’s either a testament to your prudence, or you need more of a social life KT. I am not sure which.
.
All jokes aside, Daschle on board, and Rahm’s tone from this week lead me to believe that Obama is serious about this. He actually may mean what he says for the most part.
FlownOver

KT –

Excellent piece. We’re not likely to get this sort of thorough background from the “Opinion first – facts later” branches of political reporting, whether in new media or old.
Dee in Columbia MD

KT I am in awe.
Karen Tumulty

KT here–

Actually, Dee, I don’t hang onto ALL of them, and have no system for knowing what’s actually IN most of the ones I do keep. But I knew where that one was. It was a really enlightening trip. Plus, when we had to fly in a tiny plane at one point, Daschle flew it himself. I later found out that was sort of his hazing ritual for reporters from DC who came to SD. He seemed to love the horrified look on their faces when he got in the pilot’s seat.
Paul-no not that one

Excellent piece KT. And so fast!
.
“There is some speculation that health care reform in the Obama Administration will have to take a back seat to fixing the economy. Daschle has argued that one can’t happen without the other”
And Daschle is right.
http://pourmecoffee.blogspot.com pourmecoffee

KT – Did you save your correspondence with Mr. Luce? “Dearest Henry, I am starting to feel as if you will never leave Clare …”
trifecta

I am getting a wee bit excited that policy is going to be important again. Policy is so much more fun than ideology, except to ideologues of course.
FlownOver

coffee –

Imho, in the recent unpleasantness KT almost singlehandedly corrected the historical image of Time. You may recall the old line that Luce’s major accomplishment was the creation of two magazines: Life, for those who couldn’t read, and Time, for those who couldn’t think.
Dee in Columbia MD

Having had the pleasure (and I am truly being facetious here) of riding in a small plane once! I can understand why this trip stuck in your mind. And the fact that you flew with him given the general sense of congressional incompetence I am still in awe.
Friar Tuck

“Small plane” sounds so dangerous – that’s why we like to refer to it as “general aviation.”
plukasiak

” But unlike the Clinton plan, it would not require Americans who now have coverage (and are satisfied with it) to give that up.”

um, Karen, this is so deceptive as to be false.

The 1993 Clinton plan did not force anyone to give up coverage. What it did do was force employers to provide at minimum, an “affordable” managed/care/HMO type of plan — and set standards for what constituted “health insurance”.

In other words, if you were getting ripped off by a company that claimed to be providing health insurance, but wouldn’t cover most costs, and you didn’t know you were getting ripped off (“satisfied with your coverage”) yes, you’d have to switch. But the only people who would have to switch were those who were enrolled in really crappy programs anyway….
Karen Tumulty

KT here–

Pluk: The 1993 Clinton plan, as Hillary Clinton has acknowledged, would have set up big purchasing alliances (known as HIPCs) that everyone would have had to be a part of. There would have been options within that system, but everyone would have been in a new kind of system. She herself says that was the big mistake she made, politically. That’s why, this time around, she stressed that her plan would let people who currently have coverage keep EXACTLY the coverage they have, if they like it.