In the Arena

Going Second

Last week, the New Republic published a piece by Nate Silver–sadly, no longer available on the TNR website, so no link–measuring the so-called post-Convention bounce since, I think, 1988, and there was a pretty clear pattern: the party that went second–the incumbent party–usually had the bigger bounce. One clear exception was Bill Clinton in 1992, who followed his convention with a bracing cross-country bus tour (a novelty at the time) and had the good fortune of being followed by George H.W. Bush’s not-so-hot show.

But going second certainly worked for Bush in 1988, Gore–momentarily–in 2000 and, especially, Bush in 2004. It’s a terrific advantage, a home-team advantage, as any baseball team will tell you. John McCain certainly had it at Saddleback Church last Saturday night. It’ll be an advantage when it comes to picking his vice president. And I’d guess that, unless McCain really blows his convention, it’ll work for the Republicans this year. Indeed, the effect may be heightened by the fact that the Democratic convention will be immediately followed by the GOP, thereby blunting the Obama afterglow… McCain’s smart decision to reveal his vice presidential choice on the day after Obama’s big speech, means that Obama will have to share the stage that Thursday night with an orgy of Republican vice presidential speculation similar to the one taking place among the Democrats right now. (I”ll repeat a prejudice: the veepstakes–ugly, ugly term–is the most consistently overhyped story of any given presidential season.)

Which raises the question of why on earth the Democrats scheduled their convention soclose to the Republicans this year. Answer: they were fighting the last war. In 2004, the Republicans scheduled their convention at the last possible moment, just before Labor Day, to make maximum use of their private $$$ before the federal spending regulations kicked it. The Democrats–whose federal spending restraints kicked in the moment John Kerry was nominated–had to hold their fire through most of Swift Boat August, or thought they had to, so that they wouldn’t be at a spending disadvantage in September and October.

This time, of course, there are no federal spending restraints since Obama raised a gazillion dollars, mostly from small donors, and refused to participate in the federal system. And Obama won’t have the space to reinforce his acceptance speech as Clinton and Gore did so effectively in 1992. This is a significant disadvantage going into the fall campaign. The GOP have a much better chance of bouncing out of their convention.

On the other hand, the effect of even great convention speeches tends to be fleeting: As I’ve written here before, most presidential contests are decided in the debates. In any case, don’t be surprised if John McCain has a solid lead come mid-September. But that’s when the game will really begin.

Related Topics: Uncategorized
  • Latest on Swampland

    Rick Santorum Wants to Fight ‘The Dangers Of Contraception’

    Candidates often say things when polling in the single digits that come back to haunt them when they start leading the polls. Last October, Rick Santorum gave an interview with an Evangelical blog called Caffeinated Thoughts, in which he said contraception is “not okay,” and that this would be a public policy issue he would tackle as President. In particular, he said he would “get rid of any idea that you have to have abortion coverage or contraceptive coverage” as a government policy. Start watching the following video at 17:55.

    Romney: I Was A 'Severely Conservative' GovernorHuffPost Politics

    Occupy the Regulatory Open Comment Period!

    There’s nothing “wrong” with protests built around placard-hoisting and park-squatting, but Occupy the SEC is definitely doing something right with its radically different tack. The OWS-offshoot has submitted a 325-page letter to federal financial regulatory agencies on the Volcker Rule, a controversial measure designed to prohibit banks from proprietary trading, or making investments with their own dollars rather than their customers’, that was passed as part of the Dodd-Frank financial reform law.

blog comments powered by Disqus