Answer: Free Media

By Michael Scherer | @michaelscherer | August 1, 2008 | +

Question: What was the enormous upside to John McCain’s decision to compare Barack Obama with Paris Hilton and Britney Spears?

Still have doubts? Click here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, and I could go on. Even counting those voters on vacation, what’s your guess for the percentage of Americans who have heard that McCain compared Obama to Spears and Hilton? Now how many of those same people, not to mention you Swampland readers, can tell me what the Lexington Project is? Perhaps McCain should have called it the “Paris Hilton Project.”

Of course, there is a downside to such obvious tactics–they are not exactly dignified or, um, presidential. But my guess is Crystal City slept quite well last night.

UPDATE: Per Jon Martin: “Beating out all the semi-porn videos and some Miley Cyrus riff, John McCain’s ‘Celeb’ ad was the most viewed video on YouTube this week. The tally as of Friday at 4:15: 1,271,140 views. And one can only imagine how many more people saw it on cable and network TV.”

Related Topics: Uncategorized

@TIMEPolitics

Latest on Swampland

Closeup May 25, 2012

Political Picures of the Week, May 18-25

TIME’s photo editors bring you the best pictures of the past week from the Beltway and beyond.
From our Partners
Obama Administration Blocks Global Health Fund To Fight Disease In Developing NationsHuffPost Politics

The Cowardice of Colin PowellSlate
Ryan Crocker Says Cases Of Afghans Killing NATO Military Counterparts Can Be 'Personal'HuffPost Politics
2012 Election May 25, 2012

The Phony War: Obama and Romney Are Debating Character, Not Policy

More than five months from Election Day, the back-and-forth about Mitt Romney’s record at Bain already feels played out. Unfortunately, there’s good reason to expect the campaign continues in this vein indefinitely. Neither Barack Obama nor Mitt Romney are terribly interested in dwelling on policy platforms. Romney’s plan to slash spending and keep taxes low on the wealthy isn’t especially popular, at least not at any level of detail beyond a blithe promise to shrink the deficit. Meanwhile, Obama’s signature first-term achievements, like health care, the stimulus and Wall Street reform, are all unpopular or tricky to sell. (The Dodd-Frank bill is the most popular of these, but hyping it means offending wealthy donors.) So what we’re getting instead is a superficial duel about character–and, worse, one that’s based on the largely false premise that the better man can better “manage” the economy back to health.