In the Arena

It’s Raining Nazis

Funny how quickly this always gets back to Germany, as Andrew Sullivan notes. For the record, and once again: Iraq is not Germany, nor is it South Korea. Iran is not Nazi Germany, nor the Soviet Union. The Islamist radicals are a terrible danger, as we learned on 9/11, but not an existential threat to the U.S. Any attempt to compare the current situation with Nazi Germany, as George W. Bush did recently in Jerusalem, or with post-war Germany, as Max Boot is doing in Commentary, is comparing apples and helium balloons.

We should act in accordance with the wishes of the sovereign Iraqi government: a continued U.S. presence marked by a gradual, responsible drawdown–which, my military sources estimate, would leave us with approximately 30,000 troops in Iraq in 2012. The drawdown should continue after that, leaving no long-term U.S. bases in Iraq. Ryan Crocker told a group of Time editors several months ago that he didn’t believe the Iraqis wanted a long-term U.S. presence. We should give the Iraqis what they want. Imperium doesn’t suit us, never has.

Related Topics: Uncategorized
  • Latest on Swampland

    Pete Souza / The White House via Getty Images

    Political Picures of the Week, May 18-25

    TIME’s photo editors bring you the best pictures of the past week from the Beltway and beyond.

    Obama Administration Blocks Global Health Fund To Fight Disease In Developing NationsHuffPost Politics

    From left: AP; ABACAUSA

    The Phony War: Obama and Romney Are Debating Character, Not Policy

    More than five months from Election Day, the back-and-forth about Mitt Romney’s record at Bain already feels played out. Unfortunately, there’s good reason to expect the campaign continues in this vein indefinitely. Neither Barack Obama nor Mitt Romney are terribly interested in dwelling on policy platforms. Romney’s plan to slash spending and keep taxes low on the wealthy isn’t especially popular, at least not at any level of detail beyond a blithe promise to shrink the deficit. Meanwhile, Obama’s signature first-term achievements, like health care, the stimulus and Wall Street reform, are all unpopular or tricky to sell. (The Dodd-Frank bill is the most popular of these, but hyping it means offending wealthy donors.) So what we’re getting instead is a superficial duel about character–and, worse, one that’s based on the largely false premise that the better man can better “manage” the economy back to health.

blog comments powered by Disqus