In the Arena

Next Year in Iran

The overwhelming vote in Iran’s parliament to elect Ali Larijani as Speaker seems a clear sign that Mahmoud Ahmadinejad is out of favor with Iran’s Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei. As the Times notes, Larijani is a less demonstrative–and less populist–conservative than Ahmadinejad and also a favorite of the Supreme Leader. A Bush administration spokesman took the familiar hard line, with a distinction that might be of some use to John McCain as he continues his efforts to figure out whom the real leader of Iran is:

In Washington, a senior administration official said that the real decision-maker in Iran was still Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, the country’s supreme religious leader.

“Unfortunately, the election of Mr. Larijani as parliamentary speaker is simply a continuation of the existing regime,” the official said, speaking on condition of anonymity because he was not authorized to comment publicly on the issue. “Whether he and Ahmadinejad get along is irrelevant. He’s still fully supportive of all of their policies with which we disagree.”

It is entirely possible that Khamenei is setting up Larijani as a less radioactive, more professional interlocutor for future talks with the Americans. I’m also wondering if this is a sign that Larijani will run against Ahmadinejad for president in 2009…Now there’s a presidential campaign–hint, hint, my beloved editors–that I’d love to cover.

Related Topics: Uncategorized
  • Latest on Swampland

    Pete Souza / The White House via Getty Images

    Political Picures of the Week, May 18-25

    TIME’s photo editors bring you the best pictures of the past week from the Beltway and beyond.

    Obama Administration Blocks Global Health Fund To Fight Disease In Developing NationsHuffPost Politics

    From left: AP; ABACAUSA

    The Phony War: Obama and Romney Are Debating Character, Not Policy

    More than five months from Election Day, the back-and-forth about Mitt Romney’s record at Bain already feels played out. Unfortunately, there’s good reason to expect the campaign continues in this vein indefinitely. Neither Barack Obama nor Mitt Romney are terribly interested in dwelling on policy platforms. Romney’s plan to slash spending and keep taxes low on the wealthy isn’t especially popular, at least not at any level of detail beyond a blithe promise to shrink the deficit. Meanwhile, Obama’s signature first-term achievements, like health care, the stimulus and Wall Street reform, are all unpopular or tricky to sell. (The Dodd-Frank bill is the most popular of these, but hyping it means offending wealthy donors.) So what we’re getting instead is a superficial duel about character–and, worse, one that’s based on the largely false premise that the better man can better “manage” the economy back to health.

blog comments powered by Disqus