In the Arena

Today in Iraq

Seems to me that absolutely no one is really sure what’s going on in Basra right now, although it does appear that the Mahdi Army is holding its own against the Maliki/Badr forces (or, if you prefer, the Dawa/ISCI alliance). At such times, it’s best to go with those who keep closest touch with the region…
Here’s Juan Cole’s summary of the news from Iraq.
And here’s Marc Lynch’s summary of the theories about why the Maliki government is moving against the Sadrists now.

Again, it’s important to set the stakes. This is not just about Basra. It’s about who will ultimately control Iraq, a Shi’ite majority country that will be governed by Shi’ites. This is a contest between the two main Shi’ite family dynasties, the Sadrs and the Hakims. It was precipitated by the announcement of local elections in October, elections that are likely to see significant Sadr gains.

Remarkably, the Hakims are favored by both Iran and the United States. The Sadrists are a populist, nationalist movement, with a great deal of support among poorer, urban Shi’ites, especially in Baghdad; Iran has given the Sadrists some support–on the “enemy of my enemy” theory–but the Sadrist movement ultimately is as opposed to Iranian encroachment as it is to the U.S. occupation.

Obviously, a complicated situation. And perhaps a crucial one. I’ll try to keep close track as it unfolds.

Related Topics: Uncategorized
  • Latest on Swampland

    Pete Souza / The White House via Getty Images

    Political Picures of the Week, May 18-25

    TIME’s photo editors bring you the best pictures of the past week from the Beltway and beyond.

    Obama Administration Blocks Global Health Fund To Fight Disease In Developing NationsHuffPost Politics

    From left: AP; ABACAUSA

    The Phony War: Obama and Romney Are Debating Character, Not Policy

    More than five months from Election Day, the back-and-forth about Mitt Romney’s record at Bain already feels played out. Unfortunately, there’s good reason to expect the campaign continues in this vein indefinitely. Neither Barack Obama nor Mitt Romney are terribly interested in dwelling on policy platforms. Romney’s plan to slash spending and keep taxes low on the wealthy isn’t especially popular, at least not at any level of detail beyond a blithe promise to shrink the deficit. Meanwhile, Obama’s signature first-term achievements, like health care, the stimulus and Wall Street reform, are all unpopular or tricky to sell. (The Dodd-Frank bill is the most popular of these, but hyping it means offending wealthy donors.) So what we’re getting instead is a superficial duel about character–and, worse, one that’s based on the largely false premise that the better man can better “manage” the economy back to health.

blog comments powered by Disqus