Take Back America

Not unsurprisingly, Obama won the Take Back America straw poll. The progressives today finish their annual three-day conference here in DC. A whopping 72% were for Obama, compared to 16% for Clinton, with just 12% saying they’d be happy with either. And 69% said Obama was better equipped to beat McCain versus 15% for Clinton. (See Politico story here.)

I had intended to go to the conference but was kept busy doing my civic duty (jury duty) and then my professional duty (Obama’s speech yesterday). That said, I did spend some time last Friday with progressive legends Robert Borosage and Roger Hickey, who run Campaign for America’s Future. They had some interesting insights on their movement and the general election:

1) Progressives have already started and will continue to spend unprecedented amounts of money and effort in this election against John McCain. Several groups already have tv ads up against him.
2) Progressive issues, such as the war in Iraq and universal healthcare, will dominate the general election because they are where the greatest differences lie with McCain.
3) They will not make the same mistake that progressives for Bill Clinton made in 1992: if a Democrat wins they will not, in their euphoria, simply assume the next president will actively pursue their agenda. This time, they will hold his/her feet to the fire.
4) They believe this is the beginning of the decline of conservatism, that the right wing is in retreat. Progressives are where conservatives were in 1993 and the left cannot be allowed to blow this chance.

Add this to MoveOn’s endorsement of Obama, it seems that while he’s split the union vote with Clinton, he’s winning the progressive vote. Though living up to their expectations might be easier said than done, they are realistic about what the president might be able to do right off the bat: asked what he expected the next president to do when he/she takes office Hickey said the first priority should be a plan to end the war in Iraq “or face a revolt from the left.” But second, he said, would probably have be an economic stimulus package and he said that universal healthcare would likely have to be a longer term goal.

Subscribe to Jay Newton-Small on Facebook
Related Topics: Clinton, Progressive, Take Back America, Barack Obama, Uncategorized
  • Latest on Swampland

    Pete Souza / The White House via Getty Images

    Political Picures of the Week, May 18-25

    TIME’s photo editors bring you the best pictures of the past week from the Beltway and beyond.

    Obama Administration Blocks Global Health Fund To Fight Disease In Developing NationsHuffPost Politics

    From left: AP; ABACAUSA

    The Phony War: Obama and Romney Are Debating Character, Not Policy

    More than five months from Election Day, the back-and-forth about Mitt Romney’s record at Bain already feels played out. Unfortunately, there’s good reason to expect the campaign continues in this vein indefinitely. Neither Barack Obama nor Mitt Romney are terribly interested in dwelling on policy platforms. Romney’s plan to slash spending and keep taxes low on the wealthy isn’t especially popular, at least not at any level of detail beyond a blithe promise to shrink the deficit. Meanwhile, Obama’s signature first-term achievements, like health care, the stimulus and Wall Street reform, are all unpopular or tricky to sell. (The Dodd-Frank bill is the most popular of these, but hyping it means offending wealthy donors.) So what we’re getting instead is a superficial duel about character–and, worse, one that’s based on the largely false premise that the better man can better “manage” the economy back to health.

blog comments powered by Disqus