Re: The Do-Over

As I pointed out in my story, linked below, one idea in Florida is to hold the primary by mail, which is a system similar to what they use in Oregon. That would cost somewhere between $5 million and $10 million, which only a fraction of what it would take to mount a traditional primary. It would also allow the party to deal with some issues like making sure that overseas military personnel can vote (there are more than 30,000 in the Democratic voter files in Florida) and allow the party to deal with voting rights issues, including the need for bilingual ballots.

As to the question of who will pay for it? Well, here’s the interesting twist. While McCain-Feingold outlawed soft money for federal elections, the state parties still are allowed to raise it. With both Michigan and Florida saying they won’t use taxpayer money for a second election, and Howard Dean saying the DNC doesn’t have it, it now looks that the only way to pay for all of this is to find some rich guys to write some very big checks. Paging George Soros?

As for Ana’s concern about a firehouse primary: It is a system that has been used a lot, and generally has worked. In Michigan, there are lots of places like union halls in which to hold them, and which presumably labor would donate for free. They offer an advantage over caucuses, in that they are held over the course of many hours, so you don’t disenfranchise people who can’t vote because they are, for instance, working during the hour or two that a caucus occurs.

Related Topics: Uncategorized
  • Latest on Swampland

    Gary Cameron / Reuters

    The Foreclosure Deal: Obama and the Banks Win Big While Homeowners See Modest Reward

    Those of you who have read our previous coverage of the back and forth between the state attorneys general and five major mortgage servicers know that the settlement announced on Thursday is a massive, complicated, multi-year deal negotiated by the country’s most ambitious public prosecutors, its most powerful financial institutions and some of the highest-paid lawyers in New York City. There are several levels to judge it on: the help it gives homeowners; its benefit for various political players; and what it may do for the economy. But overall, it’s a clear win for Obama and Democrats, a qualified win for the banks, and a minor, belated victory for homeowners.

    Romney: 'I Misspoke'HuffPost Politics

    Mitt Romney’s Sweet Spot: Just Conservative Enough

    Why is Mitt Romney having trouble winning over the conservative Republican base? One reason is his lack of political finesse, an air of dorky rich-guy aloofness that reminds some people of John Kerry. More important, however, is his ideological profile. In almost every important way, Romney’s policy platform is more moderate than those of Newt Gingrich and Rick Santorum. Gingrich  offers a much more conservative tax plan, along with crowd-pleasing ideas like his plan to sic federal marshals on “radical” liberal judges. Santorum carries a blazing social-conservative torch, championing ideas like a constitutional ban on abortion. Both Gingrich and Santorum talk quite openly about the virtues of bombing Iran. Romney’s temperature runs cooler in all these areas. Not to mention his past record of pro-choice, pro-gay rights positions. As Jon Chait notes today, the GOP establishment is defending Romney but also working hard to push him to the right.

blog comments powered by Disqus