In the Arena

The Name Game

Juan Cole says all that needs to be said about Barack Hussein Obama’s lovely name. But, of course, more will be said, most of it garbage and innuendo. My guess is, the only way to confront this incipient, embarrassing know-nothingism is to do exactly what Cole has done here…and to make the name as familiar, and unthreatening, to Americans as Michael Jordan’s is. It would be nice to see the television networks do similar explorations…I dare you, Fox.

Update: Reader Jim, Foolish Literalist is correctly literal when he suggests the challenge should also go to CNN and MSNBC, both of which were covered by the phrase “television networks”–and I’d even take it further, to ESPN, which regularly features athletes with Islamic-sounding names…Perhaps a piece about what those names actually mean. Blessings–yes, a pun–upon all those networks that do.

Related Topics: Uncategorized
  • Latest on Swampland

    Pete Souza / The White House via Getty Images

    Political Picures of the Week, May 18-25

    TIME’s photo editors bring you the best pictures of the past week from the Beltway and beyond.

    Obama Administration Blocks Global Health Fund To Fight Disease In Developing NationsHuffPost Politics

    From left: AP; ABACAUSA

    The Phony War: Obama and Romney Are Debating Character, Not Policy

    More than five months from Election Day, the back-and-forth about Mitt Romney’s record at Bain already feels played out. Unfortunately, there’s good reason to expect the campaign continues in this vein indefinitely. Neither Barack Obama nor Mitt Romney are terribly interested in dwelling on policy platforms. Romney’s plan to slash spending and keep taxes low on the wealthy isn’t especially popular, at least not at any level of detail beyond a blithe promise to shrink the deficit. Meanwhile, Obama’s signature first-term achievements, like health care, the stimulus and Wall Street reform, are all unpopular or tricky to sell. (The Dodd-Frank bill is the most popular of these, but hyping it means offending wealthy donors.) So what we’re getting instead is a superficial duel about character–and, worse, one that’s based on the largely false premise that the better man can better “manage” the economy back to health.

blog comments powered by Disqus