Why Not Both?

Assistant Managing Editor/Occasional Swampland intern Michael Duffy, author of this week’s story exploring the concept of a Clinton-Obama or Obama-Clinton ticket, reports in with some additional analysis:

KT

Our new poll, taken before Super Tuesday, has some stuff Swampland readers might find interesting, if not terribly surprising:

–Obama fares somewhat better against McCain than Clinton; much of the difference can be attributed to the way independents would seem to break in the two different match-ups.

–There’s a split in the way voters regard the effects of Obama choosing Clinton as a running mate and vice versa.

–Also, when we drilled down into the data, we found that Clinton supporters were more enthusiastic about having Obama on the ticket than Obama supporters were about having Clinton on the ticket.

It will be important to see if and how those measurements change as the primaries go on and on and on.

Here’s the link.

–MD

Related Topics: Uncategorized
  • Latest on Swampland

    Brendan Hoffman / Bloomberg via Getty Images

    Congressional Budget Office: Yeah Guys, Jumping Off the ‘Fiscal Cliff’ Is as Bad as It Sounds

    Breaking up partisan budgetary knife-fights can be perilous business, so in its new report on a cluster of expiring tax breaks and scheduled spending cuts, the Congressional Budget Office, home to Capitol Hill’s weary fiscal referees, exercises restraint. While most Washingtonians call it “Taxmageddon,” the CBO bean-counters refer to the event, set to take place January 1 if Congress doesn’t act, as “the Fiscal Restraint That Is Scheduled to Occur in 2013.” Catchy. But the stakes are high and the CBO’s warning is dire, so just for a second, they really let their inhibitions go:

    Lewis Eisenberg, Major Romney Donor, Accuses Obama Of Demonizing Wall StreetHuffPost Politics

    Iran Nuke Concession?

    The New York Times is reporting that Iran may be about to open its Parchin military facility to international inspections. This is a biggish deal, but not a complete breakthrough. Parchin is where Iran may have been conducting experiments on weaponizing its nuclear fuel; there has been speculation that the facility housed a chamber to test nuclear triggering devices. No doubt, if the inspections are allowed at Parchin, there’s not going to be anything there to inspect. (Although if uranium was present in the past, it will be detectable.) This is part of a flurry of Iranian activity on the eve of the next round of nuclear talks in Baghdad tomorrow.

blog comments powered by Disqus