Immigration: a Non-Issue in South Carolina?

I arrived yesterday in the Palmetto State ahead of the Democratic and Republican primaries here and I was surprised to see on tv today a commercial for Buddy Witherspoon, a conservative Republican and Lexington orthodontist who is challenging Senator Lindsey Graham in the GOP primary here. The fact that Graham has a challenger is no surprise, he won himself few friends at home in his support of the immigration talks these last two years. In fact, Graham was booed at the Republican convention here last year because of it. So the fact that a GOP challenger has raised enough money to run tv ads against Lindsey (which incidentally was one of the more racist ads I’ve seen with a woman, apparently fresh from traversing the Mexican border illegally tell viewers in a voiceover “Gracias, Lindsey Graham,” as if he drove her over personally) isn’t much of a shocker.

The surprise is that Graham’s long-time friend an co-author of the immigration bill John McCain and Mike Huckabee, who has been slammed for granting the children of illegal immigrants college scholarships, are leading in the polls here. Apparently, even though South Carolina Governor Mark Sanford cited immigration reform as a chief priority for the next session of the state Legislature in his State of the State address Wednesday night, the issue isn’t as much of a hot topic as one would imagine. Or, at least, it hasn’t dragged down either McCain or Huckabee who are leading polls here with 27% and 25% of the vote respectively followed by Freddie Thompson and Mitt Romney with 15% each, according to averages of South Carolina polls by Real Clear Politics. As Republicans go to the polls here later today, we’ll soon see if immigration truly isn’t an issue in the Palmetto State.

Subscribe to Jay Newton-Small on Facebook
Related Topics: Immigration, Mike Huckabee, South Carolina, Uncategorized
  • Latest on Swampland

    William B. Plowman / NBC

    Why Can’t President Obama Get Surrogates You Can Believe In?

    It’s one of the great unexplained frustrations of the Obama presidency: Perhaps the most telegenic political leader of his generation has not been able to recruit a bench of top-flight, telegenic spinmeisters–called “surrogates” in the business–to fight his battles on cable and network television.

    His top two economic spokespeople during the great decline of 2009–Larry Summers and Tim Geithner–had minds that chafed at the remedial logic of televised debate and voices that mumbled through talking points. His most able economic debater, Austan Goolsbee, had some success but then gave up the White House to return to Chicago and the academy. His top political spokesmen–Robert Gibbs, David Axelrod and David Plouffe–deliver a punch as hard as anyone, but for the same reason rarely elevated the President’s case beyond the ring. His Vice President, Joe Biden, hits his marks, but only when he is on message. The DNC chairwoman, Debbie Wasserman-Schultz, struggles to transcend her Congressional roots. And Bill Daley, the President’s erstwhile chief of staff who was hired in large part because of his surrogate chops, faded from the scene after few unremarkable Sunday show appearances.

    Lewis Eisenberg, Major Romney Donor, Accuses Obama Of Demonizing Wall StreetHuffPost Politics

    Obama’s Health Care Box

    Alec MacGillis of the NewRepublic has been doing some fine campaign reporting this year and here he offers a smart look at what may be the most important state of all in November–Ohio. The most striking part of the piece for me, one that illuminates an essential conundrum for Barack Obama, occurs when MacGillis goes door to door with a labor-affiliated political organizer in a white working-class neighborhood in Columbus:

blog comments powered by Disqus