Huckabee’s Talk of “God’s Standards”

One of the big questions about Mike Huckabee’s campaign is whether his brand of religion-inspired leadership will be accepted outside the evangelical base of the Republican Party. There are lots of examples of his rhetorical style that are bound to alienate Democrats (which is not that big a deal for him) and independents (which is a bigger deal for him).

One good example came yesterday, at a rally in Michigan: “[Some of my opponents] do not want to change the Constitution, but I believe it’s a lot easier to change the constitution than it would be to change the word of the living God, and that’s what we need to do is to amend the Constitution so it’s in God’s standards rather than try to change God’s standards.”

He was speaking about the two constitutional amendments he supports: A human life amendment to federally outlaw abortion, and a marriage amendment to outlaw same-sex marriage. Now there are lots of Republican politicians who speak of these two proposals in moral, if not religious, terms. But most of America is not used to a mainstream politician talking about inscribing “God’s standards” on our political documents. There is a backlash coming, for sure.

But it won’t hit anytime soon. South Carolina is the next contest, a state where most Republican voters go to church weekly, at minimum. Tomorrow morning, Huckabee will be meeting behind closed doors in Columbia with hundreds of South Carolina pastors. He is going for broke with the believer crowd. Expect much more God talk to come.

Related Topics: Uncategorized
  • Latest on Swampland

    William B. Plowman / NBC

    Why Can’t President Obama Get Surrogates You Can Believe In?

    It’s one of the great unexplained frustrations of the Obama presidency: Perhaps the most telegenic political leader of his generation has not been able to recruit a bench of top-flight, telegenic spinmeisters–called “surrogates” in the business–to fight his battles on cable and network television.

    His top two economic spokespeople during the great decline of 2009–Larry Summers and Tim Geithner–had minds that chafed at the remedial logic of televised debate and voices that mumbled through talking points. His most able economic debater, Austan Goolsbee, had some success but then gave up the White House to return to Chicago and the academy. His top political spokesmen–Robert Gibbs, David Axelrod and David Plouffe–deliver a punch as hard as anyone, but for the same reason rarely elevated the President’s case beyond the ring. His Vice President, Joe Biden, hits his marks, but only when he is on message. The DNC chairwoman, Debbie Wasserman-Schultz, struggles to transcend her Congressional roots. And Bill Daley, the President’s erstwhile chief of staff who was hired in large part because of his surrogate chops, faded from the scene after few unremarkable Sunday show appearances.

    Lewis Eisenberg, Major Romney Donor, Accuses Obama Of Demonizing Wall StreetHuffPost Politics

    Obama’s Health Care Box

    Alec MacGillis of the NewRepublic has been doing some fine campaign reporting this year and here he offers a smart look at what may be the most important state of all in November–Ohio. The most striking part of the piece for me, one that illuminates an essential conundrum for Barack Obama, occurs when MacGillis goes door to door with a labor-affiliated political organizer in a white working-class neighborhood in Columbus:

blog comments powered by Disqus