In the Arena

Political Notes

Some strange developments today:

On the Republican side, Mitt Romney’s transparently hilarious campaign continues. When he lost Iowa, he arrived in New Hampshire aping the Iowa Democratic winner’s–Obama’s–message: change. Now he arrives in Michigan, aping the New Hampshire Democratic winner’s–Clinton’s– message:

“We’re going to make sure this state gets on the move again,” Mr. Romney said. “I care about Michigan. For me, it’s personal. It’s personal for me because it’s where I was born and raised.”

Can near-tears be far behind?

On the Democratic side, Barack Obama got a valuable endorsement from the Culinary Workers Union, but he’s also getting kiss-of-death endorsements from former wine-track Democratic candidates, Bill Bradley and now, John Kerry. The endorsement Obama really needs is John Edwards, whose continued presence in the race is preventing a true referendum between the likely nominees: Would Edwards’ 20% or so go to the “change” candidate Obama…or to the beer-track candidate, Clinton? I’m not saying Edwards should leave the race–that’s obviously up to him–but it would be interesting to know who his supporters’ second choice is.

Actually, as reader Florida points out below, Obama got a crucial endorsement today–Karl Rove obviously thinks he’d be toughest Democrat to beat.

Related Topics: Uncategorized
  • Latest on Swampland

    Rick Santorum Wants to Fight ‘The Dangers Of Contraception’

    Candidates often say things when polling in the single digits that come back to haunt them when they start leading the polls. Last October, Rick Santorum gave an interview with an Evangelical blog called Caffeinated Thoughts, in which he said contraception is “not okay,” and that this would be a public policy issue he would tackle as President. In particular, he said he would “get rid of any idea that you have to have abortion coverage or contraceptive coverage” as a government policy. Start watching the following video at 17:55.

    Romney: I Was A 'Severely Conservative' GovernorHuffPost Politics

    Occupy the Regulatory Open Comment Period!

    There’s nothing “wrong” with protests built around placard-hoisting and park-squatting, but Occupy the SEC is definitely doing something right with its radically different tack. The OWS-offshoot has submitted a 325-page letter to federal financial regulatory agencies on the Volcker Rule, a controversial measure designed to prohibit banks from proprietary trading, or making investments with their own dollars rather than their customers’, that was passed as part of the Dodd-Frank financial reform law.

blog comments powered by Disqus