Re: No Big Deal

Joe makes some great points, and it’s a reminder to all of us that these moments don’t always get the same reaction from the public that they do out of the assembled media. We feed on each other’s reactions sometimes, and tend to make spot judgments that prove to be totally off the mark. I got an instructive reminder of that today, when I asked Katie Shea, the wonderful waitress who took my order at Sparks in Manchester, what she thought of the election.

Katie told me that she had intended to vote for Barack Obama, but changed her mind after watching Hillary Clinton’s debate performance on Saturday night. That, of course, included Clinton’s flash of anger, which had reporters in the filing center (including me, I’ve got to admit) gasping in shock. Some even went so far as to declare it to be the end of Clinton’s campaign.

Turns out, Katie liked what she saw. Clinton gets her vote, Katie told me, because “she stands her ground.”

Related Topics: Uncategorized
  • Latest on Swampland

    Brendan Hoffman / Bloomberg via Getty Images

    Congressional Budget Office: Yeah Guys, Jumping Off the ‘Fiscal Cliff’ Is as Bad as It Sounds

    Breaking up partisan budgetary knife-fights can be perilous business, so in its new report on a cluster of expiring tax breaks and scheduled spending cuts, the Congressional Budget Office, home to Capitol Hill’s weary fiscal referees, exercises restraint. While most Washingtonians call it “Taxmageddon,” the CBO bean-counters refer to the event, set to take place January 1 if Congress doesn’t act, as “the Fiscal Restraint That Is Scheduled to Occur in 2013.” Catchy. But the stakes are high and the CBO’s warning is dire, so just for a second, they really let their inhibitions go:

    Lewis Eisenberg, Major Romney Donor, Accuses Obama Of Demonizing Wall StreetHuffPost Politics

    Iran Nuke Concession?

    The New York Times is reporting that Iran may be about to open its Parchin military facility to international inspections. This is a biggish deal, but not a complete breakthrough. Parchin is where Iran may have been conducting experiments on weaponizing its nuclear fuel; there has been speculation that the facility housed a chamber to test nuclear triggering devices. No doubt, if the inspections are allowed at Parchin, there’s not going to be anything there to inspect. (Although if uranium was present in the past, it will be detectable.) This is part of a flurry of Iranian activity on the eve of the next round of nuclear talks in Baghdad tomorrow.

blog comments powered by Disqus