Re: Accordion Music

At the back of this community center, I ran into a group of Hillary Clinton’s law school classmates (including her own lawyer/friend/confidant David Kendall, to whom the Clintons turned during the 1998 impeachment ordeal). They are here from all corners of the country canvassing and phone banking for her, and have some interesting observations. One thing they are discovering as they call upon those who have indicated they plan to caucus for Clinton is that many households are split, with one member supporting Clinton and others supporting Edwards.

As Joe notes, there are many aspects of this exercise that suggest it is not the best way to pick a President. That is especially true on the Democratic side. Unlike the Republican caucuses, the Democratic ones require people to state their preferences publicly–often in front of their neighbors, families and even their bosses. Another is the whole question of requiring people to come out during a very limited window of time, effectively disenfranchising many Iowans. Jodi Kantor explores the implications of this in today’s New York Times.

Related Topics: Uncategorized
  • Latest on Swampland

    Brendan Hoffman / Bloomberg via Getty Images

    Congressional Budget Office: Yeah Guys, Jumping Off the ‘Fiscal Cliff’ Is as Bad as It Sounds

    Breaking up partisan budgetary knife-fights can be perilous business, so in its new report on a cluster of expiring tax breaks and scheduled spending cuts, the Congressional Budget Office, home to Capitol Hill’s weary fiscal referees, exercises restraint. While most Washingtonians call it “Taxmageddon,” the CBO bean-counters refer to the event, set to take place January 1 if Congress doesn’t act, as “the Fiscal Restraint That Is Scheduled to Occur in 2013.” Catchy. But the stakes are high and the CBO’s warning is dire, so just for a second, they really let their inhibitions go:

    Lewis Eisenberg, Major Romney Donor, Accuses Obama Of Demonizing Wall StreetHuffPost Politics

    Iran Nuke Concession?

    The New York Times is reporting that Iran may be about to open its Parchin military facility to international inspections. This is a biggish deal, but not a complete breakthrough. Parchin is where Iran may have been conducting experiments on weaponizing its nuclear fuel; there has been speculation that the facility housed a chamber to test nuclear triggering devices. No doubt, if the inspections are allowed at Parchin, there’s not going to be anything there to inspect. (Although if uranium was present in the past, it will be detectable.) This is part of a flurry of Iranian activity on the eve of the next round of nuclear talks in Baghdad tomorrow.

blog comments powered by Disqus