Giuliani’s Gamble

Rudy Giuliani’s election strategy hasn’t really wavered since he entered the race for the Republican nomination ten months ago. The idea was that Rudy would let his competitors fight it out in the first four contests — Iowa, New Hampshire, Michigan and South Carolina — and then he would render those early results meaningless by winning Florida on Jan. 29 and scoring a sweep of the biggest Feb. 5 states, including New York, California, New Jersey and Illinois. Suddenly, Giuliani would have both a huge lead in delegates and all the momentum. The race would essentially be over.

There was always a lot of risk involved in this “later states” or “national” strategy, since it was predicated on the untested notion that a candidate could lose the first four nominating contests and still emerge as the GOP nominee. But for a while, with Giuliani maintaining a large national lead and showing surprising strength in New Hampshire, Michigan and South Carolina, the strategy seemed pretty sound.

But now all of the inherent risks in the strategy are revealing themselves again. Even though Giuliani’s team has reason to be glad about Mike Huckabee’s surge in Iowa, since by winning Iowa Huckabee could seriously and perhaps fatally wound Mitt Romney’s campaign, Huck’s surge hasn’t come solely at Romney’s expense. Suddenly, the former Arkansas governor is tied with Giuliani in national polls. And with the fight right now focused on Iowa and New Hampshire, and therefore on Romney, Huckabee, McCain and Thompson, Giuliani is likely to be squeezed out of the media picture between now and Jan. 8. If that happens, his national poll numbers might fade as well. (Giuliani’s big speech in Florida yesterday was designed to steal back some media attention. But as the New York Times mentioned this morning, the spotlight stayed on the Romney-Huckabee fight.)

It’s certainly still possible that the GOP race will be such a muddle after the first four contests that Giuliani will be perfectly positioned to swoop in, win the big states and secure the nomination. But it is just as possible – and more in line with past election cycles — that someone will emerge from the early contests with too much momentum to be stopped. Giuliani is now like a football team whose playoff fate hinges on the wins and losses of other teams.

Related Topics: Uncategorized
  • Latest on Swampland

    Brendan Hoffman / Bloomberg via Getty Images

    Congressional Budget Office: Yeah Guys, Jumping Off the ‘Fiscal Cliff’ Is as Bad as It Sounds

    Breaking up partisan budgetary knife-fights can be perilous business, so in its new report on a cluster of expiring tax breaks and scheduled spending cuts, the Congressional Budget Office, home to Capitol Hill’s weary fiscal referees, exercises restraint. While most Washingtonians call it “Taxmageddon,” the CBO bean-counters refer to the event, set to take place January 1 if Congress doesn’t act, as “the Fiscal Restraint That Is Scheduled to Occur in 2013.” Catchy. But the stakes are high and the CBO’s warning is dire, so just for a second, they really let their inhibitions go:

    Lewis Eisenberg, Major Romney Donor, Accuses Obama Of Demonizing Wall StreetHuffPost Politics

    Iran Nuke Concession?

    The New York Times is reporting that Iran may be about to open its Parchin military facility to international inspections. This is a biggish deal, but not a complete breakthrough. Parchin is where Iran may have been conducting experiments on weaponizing its nuclear fuel; there has been speculation that the facility housed a chamber to test nuclear triggering devices. No doubt, if the inspections are allowed at Parchin, there’s not going to be anything there to inspect. (Although if uranium was present in the past, it will be detectable.) This is part of a flurry of Iranian activity on the eve of the next round of nuclear talks in Baghdad tomorrow.

blog comments powered by Disqus