In the Arena

Neocon Counterattack on Iran Report

Well, you had to figure this was coming. The Washington Post reports that the Senate Republicans–urged on by the usual neocon suspects–are going to try to discredit the National Intelligence Report on Iran. Danielle Pletka, the neocon La Pasionaria, offers this loathsome statement in an email:

“The problem is not the nature of the intelligence, it’s the nature of the presentation. This NIE was presented with a clear intention to deceive and to redirect foreign policy,” wrote Danielle Pletka, vice president for foreign and defense policy at the American Enterprise Institute, in an e-mail. “I have no doubt that these people believe they are protecting the nation from the President, but our constitution doesn’t contemplate the non-proliferation center at the ODNI [Office of the Director of National Intelligence] governing U.S. national security policy.”

As I reported in the Time cover story this week, the NIE was red-teamed by the CIA. The possibility of Iranian disinformation was found to be “plausible, but unlikely.” And here’s the most important point: After reading the classified report, including the red team findings, only 2 of the 16 intelligence agencies were sufficiently worried to rate the probability of Iran’s shutting down its weapons program “moderate” as opposed to “high.”

Finally, I am very grateful to Pletka for unwittingly reinforcing the point I’ve been trying to make all week about the importance of this NIE:

I have no doubt that these people believe they are protecting the nation from the President

Well, I’m not sure that was the intelligence community’s intent, but it certainly was the effect of the report. And a good thing it is, too.

Update: According to Kevin Drum, the poison is spreading and there is now a liberal line of dissent against the NIE. I think Ray Takeyh is a smart, if occasionally quirky, Iran analyst. But he, and the others who believe the uranium enrichment program is a problem, are staring at a twig and missing the forest: For the first time, in an incredible moment of candor, the intelligence community said to the American public: “What the President has been saying to you is wrong.”

Related Topics: Uncategorized
  • Latest on Swampland

    William B. Plowman / NBC

    Why Can’t President Obama Get Surrogates You Can Believe In?

    It’s one of the great unexplained frustrations of the Obama presidency: Perhaps the most telegenic political leader of his generation has not been able to recruit a bench of top-flight, telegenic spinmeisters–called “surrogates” in the business–to fight his battles on cable and network television.

    His top two economic spokespeople during the great decline of 2009–Larry Summers and Tim Geithner–had minds that chafed at the remedial logic of televised debate and voices that mumbled through talking points. His most able economic debater, Austan Goolsbee, had some success but then gave up the White House to return to Chicago and the academy. His top political spokesmen–Robert Gibbs, David Axelrod and David Plouffe–deliver a punch as hard as anyone, but for the same reason rarely elevated the President’s case beyond the ring. His Vice President, Joe Biden, hits his marks, but only when he is on message. The DNC chairwoman, Debbie Wasserman-Schultz, struggles to transcend her Congressional roots. And Bill Daley, the President’s erstwhile chief of staff who was hired in large part because of his surrogate chops, faded from the scene after few unremarkable Sunday show appearances.

    Lewis Eisenberg, Major Romney Donor, Accuses Obama Of Demonizing Wall StreetHuffPost Politics

    Obama’s Health Care Box

    Alec MacGillis of the NewRepublic has been doing some fine campaign reporting this year and here he offers a smart look at what may be the most important state of all in November–Ohio. The most striking part of the piece for me, one that illuminates an essential conundrum for Barack Obama, occurs when MacGillis goes door to door with a labor-affiliated political organizer in a white working-class neighborhood in Columbus:

blog comments powered by Disqus