Re: SwampCast

Yes, I am “bedraggled.” Sorry. It had been a long day. It is, in fact, still going on. Am at the McCain MySpace/MTV forum. After a day of not-very-funny jokes about how he’d have to answer questions about, dunno, Britney. But almost all the questions haven’t been just serious, but about foreign policy. Oh, and global warming. All in all, it was a more substantive discussion than every single previous GOP debate combined. And they seem to really like his answers. See the live-polling here. And, it is incredibly unscientific but the numbers are thought-provoking. Before the debate started, the kids on the tubes were asked if McCain’s positions were more or less likely to make them vote for him:

Strongly agree 21
Somewhat more likely 15
Not sure but might 24

Not sure but I doubt it 10
Somewhat disagree 8
Strongly disagree 18

Same question, thirty minutes later:

Strongly agree 30
Somewhat more likely 22
Not sure but might 16

Not sure but I doubt it 6
Somewhat disagree 7
Strongly disagree 15

By the end of the forum — I’m still looking for the exact numbers — he had won over almost 80 percent of the audience. Not bad for an old guy who, as he said, “is older than dirt and has more scars than Frankenstein.” More to the point, a guy whose social views diametrically oppose what polls tell us are the emerging consensus of young people (who are pro gay rights, anti gun, pro choice, etc.). So how did he get them? MTV will have the forum up soon and you can investigate for yourself, but for now, I think the attraction is to someone who appears simultaneously dignified and irreverent, and whose answers never seem — even when they pretty much are — like partisan dogma. But they loved the ones that weren’t: He got applause for his responses on global warming (we should do something), torture (we shouldn’t do it), and Darfur (“Americans are tired of hearing ‘never again’”). Then he told them that we should stay in Iraq. They didn’t applaud, but at least they listened.

Related Topics: Uncategorized
  • Latest on Swampland

    Brendan Hoffman / Bloomberg via Getty Images

    Congressional Budget Office: Yeah Guys, Jumping Off the ‘Fiscal Cliff’ Is as Bad as It Sounds

    Breaking up partisan budgetary knife-fights can be perilous business, so in its new report on a cluster of expiring tax breaks and scheduled spending cuts, the Congressional Budget Office, home to Capitol Hill’s weary fiscal referees, exercises restraint. While most Washingtonians call it “Taxmageddon,” the CBO bean-counters refer to the event, set to take place January 1 if Congress doesn’t act, as “the Fiscal Restraint That Is Scheduled to Occur in 2013.” Catchy. But the stakes are high and the CBO’s warning is dire, so just for a second, they really let their inhibitions go:

    Lewis Eisenberg, Major Romney Donor, Accuses Obama Of Demonizing Wall StreetHuffPost Politics

    Iran Nuke Concession?

    The New York Times is reporting that Iran may be about to open its Parchin military facility to international inspections. This is a biggish deal, but not a complete breakthrough. Parchin is where Iran may have been conducting experiments on weaponizing its nuclear fuel; there has been speculation that the facility housed a chamber to test nuclear triggering devices. No doubt, if the inspections are allowed at Parchin, there’s not going to be anything there to inspect. (Although if uranium was present in the past, it will be detectable.) This is part of a flurry of Iranian activity on the eve of the next round of nuclear talks in Baghdad tomorrow.

blog comments powered by Disqus