Social Security

By Karen Tumulty | November 23, 2007 | +

In this week’s Dead-Tree TIME, I look at a phenomenon I don’t recall seeing before in a Democratic primary: The leading contenders are having an argument over Social Security. That program, of course, is something that Democrats usually fight about with Republicans, not each other. Why now? As Obama strategist David Axelrod sees it, the real issue isn’t Social Security:

“We’re not really picking a fight about Social Security. We’re picking a fight about candor. [Obama] has been forthright about this, and Senator Clinton hasn’t.”

Team Clinton fires back:

“This whole conversation is bewildering. Every Democrat in America has spent the past several years arguing that Social Security is not in a crisis.”

Also, in D-TT, Jackson Dykman crunches the numbers behind the charges that Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama are trading back and forth: Uncategorized

@TIMEPolitics

Latest on Swampland

Congress May 22, 2012

Congressional Budget Office: Yeah Guys, Jumping Off the ‘Fiscal Cliff’ Is as Bad as It Sounds

Breaking up partisan budgetary knife-fights can be perilous business, so in its new report on a cluster of expiring tax breaks and scheduled spending cuts, the Congressional Budget Office, home to Capitol Hill’s weary fiscal referees, exercises restraint. While most Washingtonians call it “Taxmageddon,” the CBO bean-counters refer to the event, set to take place January 1 if Congress doesn’t act, as “the Fiscal Restraint That Is Scheduled to Occur in 2013.” Catchy. But the stakes are high and the CBO’s warning is dire, so just for a second, they really let their inhibitions go:
From our Partners
Lewis Eisenberg, Major Romney Donor, Accuses Obama Of Demonizing Wall StreetHuffPost Politics

Twice-Told TalesSlate
Mitt Romney's $11.7 Million Raised In April Isn't The Whole PictureHuffPost Politics
Iran May 22, 2012

Iran Nuke Concession?

The New York Times is reporting that Iran may be about to open its Parchin military facility to international inspections. This is a biggish deal, but not a complete breakthrough. Parchin is where Iran may have been conducting experiments on weaponizing its nuclear fuel; there has been speculation that the facility housed a chamber to test nuclear triggering devices. No doubt, if the inspections are allowed at Parchin, there’s not going to be anything there to inspect. (Although if uranium was present in the past, it will be detectable.) This is part of a flurry of Iranian activity on the eve of the next round of nuclear talks in Baghdad tomorrow.