But What If It Has a Good Beat and You Can Dance to It?

The various bias-hunters on both sides the blogosphere are generally useful, if a tad alarmist. If nothing else, they’re like an early-warning system for fake outrage (or: tomorrow’s Howie Kurtz column, today!). One thing I’ll give Media Matters over NewsBusters, though: MM has never taken their earnest and literal approach to detecting political intent in the news and tried to apply it to, you know, art.

Posted at around five this morning (which makes me want to believe it’s the product of some kind of meth-and-Doritos rage binge): “The Eagles New Album: Slamming America Throughout.” In a Talmudic close examination of the lyrics, the post’s author, Warner Todd Huston, finds numerous nuggets of liberal thoughtcrime (including global warming fearmonging, anti-religious zealotry and — an oldie but a goodie — betraying the troops).

One marvels at the amount of energy expended on deconstructing the Eagles’ songwriting skills when you could easily just point out that they suck. (On the plus side, it’s probably the most work anyone’s put into an Eagles review in years.) But their schlocky descent into musical self-parody isn’t the point for Huston. According to him, the Eagles have committed a cultural violation that outweighs their formulaic post-Boomer MadLibs approach to rock and roll: They have, in his words, “completely forgotten 9/11.”

See, it’s not just that they wrote about global warming that’s the problem, it’s also what they didn’t write about:

Not a word about Islamofascists trying to blow us all up, though. Nothing about bin Laddenists cutting off people’s heads, women being stoned, young girls being murdered with “honor killings,” or homosexuals being summarily executed from our pals the Eagles!

It is worth reading, as they say, the whole thing. But if you need a quick summary, well… Shorter Warren Todd Huston: “Comrades do not understand that the purpose of art is to glorify the Five Year Plan.”

Related Topics: Uncategorized
  • Latest on Swampland

    William B. Plowman / NBC

    Why Can’t President Obama Get Surrogates You Can Believe In?

    It’s one of the great unexplained frustrations of the Obama presidency: Perhaps the most telegenic political leader of his generation has not been able to recruit a bench of top-flight, telegenic spinmeisters–called “surrogates” in the business–to fight his battles on cable and network television.

    His top two economic spokespeople during the great decline of 2009–Larry Summers and Tim Geithner–had minds that chafed at the remedial logic of televised debate and voices that mumbled through talking points. His most able economic debater, Austan Goolsbee, had some success but then gave up the White House to return to Chicago and the academy. His top political spokesmen–Robert Gibbs, David Axelrod and David Plouffe–deliver a punch as hard as anyone, but for the same reason rarely elevated the President’s case beyond the ring. His Vice President, Joe Biden, hits his marks, but only when he is on message. The DNC chairwoman, Debbie Wasserman-Schultz, struggles to transcend her Congressional roots. And Bill Daley, the President’s erstwhile chief of staff who was hired in large part because of his surrogate chops, faded from the scene after few unremarkable Sunday show appearances.

    Lewis Eisenberg, Major Romney Donor, Accuses Obama Of Demonizing Wall StreetHuffPost Politics

    Obama’s Health Care Box

    Alec MacGillis of the NewRepublic has been doing some fine campaign reporting this year and here he offers a smart look at what may be the most important state of all in November–Ohio. The most striking part of the piece for me, one that illuminates an essential conundrum for Barack Obama, occurs when MacGillis goes door to door with a labor-affiliated political organizer in a white working-class neighborhood in Columbus:

blog comments powered by Disqus