In the Arena

Better in Iraq?

Spencer Ackerman has a smart analysis over at Tapped. I’m a bit less sanguine about the Sadr-Hakim peace holding for very long–there are constant skirmishes between the two factions throughout the Iraqi south, I’m told. But Ackerman’s point about the rise of Sunni military power–67,000 militia-men in arms–is a good one. The trouble is, this could easily go the other way: away from reconciliation, toward warlordism. Which is why this is the time for a high-profile US diplomatic push in Iraq.

And finally, let me emphasize the most important point: The defeat of Al Qaeda in Iraq means that our military work is pretty much over. We should commence a stately withdrawal–a brigade a month–as quickly as possible. The remaining violence in Iraq is mostly internecine, and none of our business; the remaining problems are political and can only be solved by Iraqis.

Related Topics: Uncategorized
  • Latest on Swampland

    Our Pakistani Allies

    In another demonstration of diplomatic silliness, the Pakistanis have convicted the doctor who helped us find Osama bin Laden of treason and sentenced him to 33 years in prison. This helps to clarify which side the Pakistanis are actually on. Hint: it’s not ours. I’ll have more about this in my print column tomorrow.

    Lewis Eisenberg, Major Romney Donor, Accuses Obama Of Demonizing Wall StreetHuffPost Politics

    Morning Must Reads: Revisited

blog comments powered by Disqus