In the Arena

Response to Karen

The Levin-Warner reaction to their Iraq visit is certainly smarter than some others I’ve seen. They essentially confirm what I reported in June–that there’s good news in that the Sunni tribes have turned against the Salafists and really bad news about the utter inability of the Iraqis to govern themselves.

I do think they were taken a bit by the military on the question of progress in the Iraqi Army and police forces. I tend to agree with the non-coms who wrote the op-ed in the Sunday NewYork Times, and also with some of the combat officers I spoke with in Iraq–that the Iraqis are quite undependable, in many cases little more than militia members in camouflage.

What should be frightening to Democrats is this: Bush and Petraeus will probably announce a drawndown from 20 to 15 combat brigages over the next year. This is negligible, no more than following the current rotation pattern back down to pre-surge troop levels (130,000). It will be difficult for Congressional Democrats to explain to an apathetic public why this isn’t nearly enough, why a real change in policy is needed.

Related Topics: Uncategorized
  • Latest on Swampland

    Morning Must Reads: Revisited

    Lewis Eisenberg, Major Romney Donor, Accuses Obama Of Demonizing Wall StreetHuffPost Politics

    Hamed Jafarnejad / UPI / Fars News / LANDOV

    Long-Term Uncertainty Remains in Nuclear Talks with Iran

    Anyone banking on a big-win breakthrough in Wednesday’s nuclear talks with Iran will likely find themselves in the same boat as investors who bet on an instant surge in the Facebook stock price last week. If there’s value to be found in nuclear negotiations with Iran, then — like an investment in Facebook — it’s likely to emerge over time. And in both cases, even the long-term outcome remains uncertain.

blog comments powered by Disqus