In the Arena

Obama’s Speech

To answer Karen’s question below, I thought Obama’s counter-terrorism speech today was just right…and not just because he sent the correct signal to Pakistan. There were a half dozen other ideas in the speech about terrorism prevention and public diplomacy that were smart and creative, including the idea of creating joint military-diplomatic teams to do the nation-building and neighborhood-securing that is at the heart of our effort in places like Afghanistan.
I wrote a column about creating an elite corps to do this sort of thing several years ago. The military hated the idea–but it is time that we began to explore the notion of expanding “jointness” beyond the Pentagon definition (joint inter-service operations) to include other departments like State and Justice.

Obama’s idea of spending money to help countries create non-religious schools to counter the influence of the (Saudi-funded, let’s not forget) madrasas adds his voice to that of Senator Joe Biden, who has been trying to get this sort of legislation passed for years.

Finally, on Pakistan, what Obama is proposing is the precise opposite of what Bush has done. It is clear that not only is General Musharraf incapable of controlling his tribal areas, but also that there are elements of the Pakistani military and intelligence services that are actively Salafist and support the jihadis, quite possibly including the Al Qaeda leadership. Bush has chosen to do nothing about this. Which is remarkable: here’s the group most successful at attacking the U.S. homeland, that has rebuilt its infrastructure (according to the national intelligence estimate), the group that Bush had vowed to make “war” upon–and we are allowing it to fester, perhaps even to plan more attacks on our citizens?

If there was ever a vital national security interest of the United States, this is it. Indeed, the Iraq war was a criminally foolish diversion from this mission. It is a good thing that Senator Obama is willing to consider non-traditional military actions to remove it–and an even better thing that he knows that a far more supple array of non-kinetic actions will be necessary to restore our place in the world.

Related Topics: Uncategorized
  • Latest on Swampland

    Rick Santorum Wants to Fight ‘The Dangers Of Contraception’

    Candidates often say things when polling in the single digits that come back to haunt them when they start leading the polls. Last October, Rick Santorum gave an interview with an Evangelical blog called Caffeinated Thoughts, in which he said contraception is “not okay,” and that this would be a public policy issue he would tackle as President. In particular, he said he would “get rid of any idea that you have to have abortion coverage or contraceptive coverage” as a government policy. Start watching the following video at 17:55.

    Romney: I Was A 'Severely Conservative' GovernorHuffPost Politics

    Occupy the Regulatory Open Comment Period!

    There’s nothing “wrong” with protests built around placard-hoisting and park-squatting, but Occupy the SEC is definitely doing something right with its radically different tack. The OWS-offshoot has submitted a 325-page letter to federal financial regulatory agencies on the Volcker Rule, a controversial measure designed to prohibit banks from proprietary trading, or making investments with their own dollars rather than their customers’, that was passed as part of the Dodd-Frank financial reform law.

blog comments powered by Disqus