In the Arena

Here We Go…

Greg Sargent over at TPM has the transcript of remarks Barack Obama just made slamming Hillary Clinton, a continuation of the tiff that began during Monday night’s Youtube debate.

So, reality check: Substantively, this isn’t about very much at all. Both candidates would go about–finally!–talking to the rogue states in the same way: cautiously, but actively. As I’ve written and written, the U.S. government’s diplomatic non-recognition policy is quite stupid and counterproductive. It began 90 years ago, with the non-recognition of the Soviet Union. It should end in the next administration.

Then, Hillary was wrong to slag Obama? Not entirely. She made a teeny-tiny point about experience and judiciousness. You don’t flat-out say you’re going to meet with anyone without doing the groundwork first. If, say, Hugo Chavez, is going to come to the oval office with a deodorizer to clear the sulphuric smell from the air, you want to have some hint of his intentions in advance. You want to go into the meeting with at least one (small) point of agreement, if possible, that you can hold up as progress.

But the real significance of the exchange had nothing to do with foreign leaders: It showed that the ultra-programmed Hillary has a lightning fast political intelligence, something I never quite realized before. She siezed the moment and pounced. You want a candidate like that in general election debates. (I’ll have more on Hillary’s candidacy in my print column this week.)

Finally, I’m not sure about the wisdom of Barack Obama keeping this thing alive, launching nuclear war during a slow, slow week of summer. He may have to go after Clinton eventually–she’s the front runner–but, as with meetings with foreign leaders, the groundwork should be laid in advance, the attacks should be smart and thorough, especially when coming from a candidate whose selling point is his desire for post-partisan, anti-attack politics. He should wait until people are actually paying attention–like next November. He should not go nuclear in a week when people are focused on Lindsey Lohan.

Related Topics: Uncategorized
  • Latest on Swampland

    Mitt Romney’s Sweet Spot: Just Conservative Enough

    Why is Mitt Romney having trouble winning over the conservative Republican base? One reason is his lack of political finesse, an air of dorky rich-guy aloofness that reminds some people of John Kerry. More important, however, is his ideological profile. In almost every important way, Romney’s policy platform is more moderate than those of Newt Gingrich and Rick Santorum. Gingrich  offers a much more conservative tax plan, along with crowd-pleasing ideas like his plan to sic federal marshals on “radical” liberal judges. Santorum carries a blazing social-conservative torch, championing ideas like a constitutional ban on abortion. Both Gingrich and Santorum talk quite openly about the virtues of bombing Iran. Romney’s temperature runs cooler in all these areas. Not to mention his past record of pro-choice, pro-gay rights positions. As Jon Chait notes today, the GOP establishment is defending Romney but also working hard to push him to the right.

    Romney: 'I Misspoke'HuffPost Politics

    Conflict Over Obama’s Contraception Rule Intensifies

    The Administration’s decision to require Catholic charities and universities to provide free birth control through employee health coverage is several weeks old, but the maelstrom of dissent it’s created is widening. Republicans, who charge that the measure violates such organizations’ religious freedoms, have allied with Catholic groups in opposition, and in recent days a handful of high-profile Democrats have joined their ranks in calling on the Administration to broaden exemptions from the rule.

blog comments powered by Disqus