Still Catching Up…

By Karen Tumulty | April 9, 2007 | +

Just back from Spring Break and catching up with what I missed, including this story in yesterday’s Washington Post recounting how the White House failed to see the warning signs when it nominated Bernard Kerik to be head of Homeland Security. One of the main reasons, it turns out, was that Rudy Giuliani was vouching for him. Will this become a problem in the Republican frontrunner’s presidential bid? He didn’t seem to see it that way at the time, as was evidenced by this quote from Jay Carney’s report:

“Everything seemed pretty normal, at least by Washington or New York standards,” his mentor and boss, former New York City mayor Rudolph Giuliani, told TIME.

Related Topics: Uncategorized

@TIMEPolitics

Latest on Swampland

Mitt Romney May 16, 2012

Why Romney Is Dodging the Press

Joe, the Romney campaign’s control-freakery makes for bad democracy, but I suspect it’s a smart strategy. Consider the way Mitt’s personal approval rating has bounced back over the past several weeks. As the GOP primaries wrapped up, Romney was roughly as unpopular as late-era George W. Bush. Now he’s about even with Barack Obama.

Since becoming the presumptive Republican nominee, Romney’s favorable-unfavorable rating has jumped to 50%-41%, his best ever and in the same neighborhood as Obama’s 52%-46% standing.

What changed? Well, for one thing, other Republican rivals are no longer attacking Romney. That helps. But it’s not like he’s had a free ride: the Obama camp has picked up where Rick and Newt left off. An alternate explanation would be that Americans are simply seeing less of Romney, and that makes them like him better.
From our Partners
For Obama, gay marriage stance born of a long evolutionHuffPost Politics

Gay Marriage, Black VotersSlate
Mitt Romney Says Homosexuality Wasn't Discussed In 1960s; History Tells A Different StoryHuffPost Politics
Ads May 16, 2012

Crossroads, Super PACs and the Incumbent Advertising Gap

In a recent piece about the Obama-Romney ad wars, Michael Scherer made the smart point that this election is different from past ones in that the incumbent no longer gets a free hit on his rival during the period immediately following the primary. The reason: super PACs have the cash to cover that gap while the challenger collects enough general election funds to keep pace.