In the Arena

Today’s Alterman–Continued

Several readers have wondered why I’m wasting my time with Eric Alterman. (Here’s today’s attack on me, by the way).

Here’s why: I’ve noticed that a fair number of readers have, shall we say, a slightly inaccurate impression about who I am and what I care about. Where do they get these ideas? From intellectually dishonest bloggers like Alterman. Why intellectually dishonest? Because he sarcastically calls me Time’s “most liberal” columnist and never once–not once–links to something “liberal” that I’ve written. I only appear on his radar screen when I criticize Democrats, which–yes–I sometimes do…but not nearly as often as I’ve criticized Republicans, especially during the past six years. A fairly flagrant case of bias, I would say.

The first time I met Alterman, nearly twenty years ago, I was under attack by assorted New York liberals for taking the shocking position that Daniel Patrick Moynihan was right: that out-of-wedlock births were helping to destroy the black community. The evidence of the disaster was coming in strong, and liberals refused to even consider the problem–until William Julius Wilson broke the silence with his fine book, The Truly Disadvantaged, and even then Wilson was accused, as I was, of “blaming the victim.” In any case, Alterman introduced himself to me at a party around that time and said, “Doesn’t it bother you that everybody hates you so much?”

“Not at all,” I told him. (Actually, most people kind of liked what I was writing in those days–just none of the people Alterman hung with). I was describing what I saw in the poorest neighborhoods, but I was also regularly writing about creative ideas to solve the problems.

I’ve taken non-stop crap from Alterman ever since, and tried to ignore it. But now I’m living in his world–your world, the blogosphere–and I’m just not going to let him get away with his persistent intellectual dishonesty. (Even Atrios, with whom i’ve had some disagreements–to say the least–has linked to posts of mine that he thought worthy).

I’ll try not to waste any valuable blogospace on this matter in the future. I won’t even link to Alterman’s attack on me tomorrow…or whenever. I just wanted you to know that he’s not reliable.

Related Topics: Uncategorized
  • Latest on Swampland

    Ron Paul holds a campaign event in Virginia in early 2012.

    The Story of Ron Paul’s Presidential Candidacy as Told by His Supporters in Our Comments Section

    Most people have hobbies: golf, model trains, restoring old cars, whatever. A year after Ron Paul announced his Republican presidential bid, I have concluded that his supporters must not do these things. They can’t possibly have the time. While others are at rest or at play, Paul’s supporters are on the Internet, googling his name and diving into the comments sections of news articles to register their opinions.

    For Obama, gay marriage stance born of a long evolutionHuffPost Politics

    MANDEL NGAN / AFP / Getty Images

    Bashing Bain: Why Obama’s New Attacks on Romney Might Not Work

    The much-heralded and long-awaited Obama campaign media attack on Mitt Romney began Monday with a reporter conference call and the release of two videos bemoaning the pain caused after Romney’s former private equity firm, Bain Capital, took over a Missouri steel company called GST Steel. The effort is textbook negative politics, from the sympathetic white working class steel men bemoaning their lost careers to the talk about “values” and the shots of lonely industrial wastelands left by the collective failure of Romney, Bain and GST.

blog comments powered by Disqus