A Texas Affair?

This came over the wires from the White House not long ago:

*THERE WILL BE AN ON-CAMERA BRIEFING BY DAN BARTLETT, COUNSELOR TO THE PRESIDENT, AT 2:00 PM LOCAL TIME (4:00 PM EDT) IN THE PRESS FILING CENTER IN MERIDA, MEXICO*

Tony Snow is on the LatAm trip, and Bartlett rarely briefs the press. So there’s a very specific reason they’re putting Bartlett out there. And the reason — I’m almost certain — is because Bartlett has, since Bush’s 2000 campaign, been the keeper of the Texas vault. Whenever the press had questions about Bush’s record as governor, or his “young and irresponsible days,” Bartlett, working with Karen Hughes, was the operation’s point person.

Why go to Bartlett now? Because all the principals involved in this unfolding story are old hands from Bush’s days in Austin — Harriet Miers, Alberto Gonzales, Karl Rove. Snow is an interloper in this crowd; the delicate task of protecting the Texas family has to fall to Bartlett.

It shows how nervous the White House is about this.

Related Topics: Uncategorized
  • Latest on Swampland

    Why Romney Is Dodging the Press

    Joe, the Romney campaign’s control-freakery makes for bad democracy, but I suspect it’s a smart strategy. Consider the way Mitt’s personal approval rating has bounced back over the past several weeks. As the GOP primaries wrapped up, Romney was roughly as unpopular as late-era George W. Bush. Now he’s about even with Barack Obama.

    Since becoming the presumptive Republican nominee, Romney’s favorable-unfavorable rating has jumped to 50%-41%, his best ever and in the same neighborhood as Obama’s 52%-46% standing.

    What changed? Well, for one thing, other Republican rivals are no longer attacking Romney. That helps. But it’s not like he’s had a free ride: the Obama camp has picked up where Rick and Newt left off. An alternate explanation would be that Americans are simply seeing less of Romney, and that makes them like him better.

    For Obama, gay marriage stance born of a long evolutionHuffPost Politics

    Crossroads, Super PACs and the Incumbent Advertising Gap

    In a recent piece about the Obama-Romney ad wars, Michael Scherer made the smart point that this election is different from past ones in that the incumbent no longer gets a free hit on his rival during the period immediately following the primary. The reason: super PACs have the cash to cover that gap while the challenger collects enough general election funds to keep pace.

blog comments powered by Disqus