In the Arena

Clinton-Obama

Well, everybody seems to be having fun with this.. A few observations:

1. I think Obama won the round. The Clinton camp’s initial reaction was over the top: Do they really expect Obama to censor his campaign contributors? The Obama camp’s response was swift, brutal and elegant, another signal–after Obama’s take-down of the Australian Prime Minister–that he’s not going to take guff from anyone. And Hillary raising the “politics of personal destruction” at the AFSCME candidate forum because a Hollywood mogul leveled on her seemed rote and oh so ten years ago.

2. I love all the tut-tutting from other Democrats (Richardson, Vilsack). Such a transparent attempt to break into the news.

3. This is useful. You want to see how feisty the candidates are going to be. If John Edwards had gone after Kerry in the primaries, we might have learned how inept the big guy’s responses would be when the Republicans attacked.

4. Yeah, yeah–this was about fluff, not substance. But it makes me hopeful that some real tiffs about substance will come in time.

I’ll have more to say about the Clinton and McCain campaigns–two stumbling front-runners–in my print column, to be posted later today.

Related Topics: Uncategorized
  • Latest on Swampland

    Why Romney Is Dodging the Press

    Joe, the Romney campaign’s control-freakery makes for bad democracy, but I suspect it’s a smart strategy. Consider the way Mitt’s personal approval rating has bounced back over the past several weeks. As the GOP primaries wrapped up, Romney was roughly as unpopular as late-era George W. Bush. Now he’s about even with Barack Obama.

    Since becoming the presumptive Republican nominee, Romney’s favorable-unfavorable rating has jumped to 50%-41%, his best ever and in the same neighborhood as Obama’s 52%-46% standing.

    What changed? Well, for one thing, other Republican rivals are no longer attacking Romney. That helps. But it’s not like he’s had a free ride: the Obama camp has picked up where Rick and Newt left off. An alternate explanation would be that Americans are simply seeing less of Romney, and that makes them like him better.

    For Obama, gay marriage stance born of a long evolutionHuffPost Politics

    Crossroads, Super PACs and the Incumbent Advertising Gap

    In a recent piece about the Obama-Romney ad wars, Michael Scherer made the smart point that this election is different from past ones in that the incumbent no longer gets a free hit on his rival during the period immediately following the primary. The reason: super PACs have the cash to cover that gap while the challenger collects enough general election funds to keep pace.

blog comments powered by Disqus