In the Arena

Nicorette?

Ames, Iowa–Barack Obama turned a little spikey this morning in his first official press conference of the campaign. It started innocently enough–several questions about Iraq: How important was it that he was against the war from the start? Answer: “I think it demonstrates that even at that time it was possible to make judgments that this would not work out well…and that [speaks] to the sort of judgments I might make as president.” Obama wisely refused to get into an assessment of Hillary Clinton’s Iraq position and added that his own plan–combat troops out by March 2008–was the most specific of any Democrat.
Later, though, he allowed himself into drift into a criticism of “a theme out there in the mainstream media” that he emphasized rhetoric at the expense of policy specifics. He said there were plenty of specifics in his books and his Iraq plan, “The substance is out there,” he said, “but that’s not what’s been reported. What’s been reported is how I look in a bathing suit.” Ouch.
Then, at the end of the presser, Obama squatted down next to three student reporters and answered a question about the No Child Left Behind bill. He answered well, in detail and without patronizing the kids. Then he looked up at the rest of us and said, “Take some notes guys. That’s how you do it.”
Huh? Why so prickly?
Well, the answer may have been contained in a seemingly trivial question from Mara Liaison of NPR: Are you still smoking? “Been chewing Nicorette all day.” He said.
Oh.
(Update: Mara reminds me that she asked a substantive Iraq question–should the U.S. troops take control of Iraq’s borders?–before she asked Obama about smoking.)
For the record, here’s the question I wanted to ask, but wasn’t called upon: Are you in favor of pulling our troops out of the Baghdad civil war now–as Senator Jack Reed and others are–and concentrating on fighting the Sunni extremists in Al Anbar province?
In other words, how do we begin moving toward the redeployment of all combat troops out of Iraq by March 2008?

Update: I should add that in the press conference Obama totally slam-dunked Austrialian Prime Minister John Howard who had criticized Obama’s anti-war position. Obama responded that Australia currently has 1400 troops in Iraq and if Howard feels so strongly about “fighting the good fight” he should “send 20,000 more Australians to fight in Iraq.”
To which I say, amen and hooray for nicotine withdrawal.

And more: From Think Progress:

This morning on Fox News Sunday, Weekly Standard editor William Kristol attacked Obama’s Iraq policy, saying he wants to appease terrorists like pro-slavery politician Stephen Douglas tried to appease slave-owners. Kristol said, “Obama’s speech is a ‘can’t we get along’ speech — sort of the opposite of Lincoln. He would have been with Stephen Douglas in 1858.”

Jeez, Bill. Get a grip. This isn’t our civil war. It’s theirs…and we caused it.

And finally: Another Klein heard from. Ezra, constructively critical about Obama.

Related Topics: Uncategorized
  • Latest on Swampland

    Gary Cameron / Reuters

    The Foreclosure Deal: Obama and the Banks Win Big While Homeowners See Modest Reward

    Those of you who have read our previous coverage of the back and forth between the state attorneys general and five major mortgage servicers know that the settlement announced on Thursday is a massive, complicated, multi-year deal negotiated by the country’s most ambitious public prosecutors, its most powerful financial institutions and some of the highest-paid lawyers in New York City. There are several levels to judge it on: the help it gives homeowners; its benefit for various political players; and what it may do for the economy. But overall, it’s a clear win for Obama and Democrats, a qualified win for the banks, and a minor, belated victory for homeowners.

    Romney: 'I Misspoke'HuffPost Politics

    Mitt Romney’s Sweet Spot: Just Conservative Enough

    Why is Mitt Romney having trouble winning over the conservative Republican base? One reason is his lack of political finesse, an air of dorky rich-guy aloofness that reminds some people of John Kerry. More important, however, is his ideological profile. In almost every important way, Romney’s policy platform is more moderate than those of Newt Gingrich and Rick Santorum. Gingrich  offers a much more conservative tax plan, along with crowd-pleasing ideas like his plan to sic federal marshals on “radical” liberal judges. Santorum carries a blazing social-conservative torch, championing ideas like a constitutional ban on abortion. Both Gingrich and Santorum talk quite openly about the virtues of bombing Iran. Romney’s temperature runs cooler in all these areas. Not to mention his past record of pro-choice, pro-gay rights positions. As Jon Chait notes today, the GOP establishment is defending Romney but also working hard to push him to the right.

blog comments powered by Disqus