In the Arena

No Debate?

I just spoke with a prominent Democratic member of the Senate who is worried that the anti-surge forces won’t be able to muster the 60 votes necessary to open debate this evening on the Warner resolution to oppose the President’s policies in Iraq.

If so, the Republicans are going to have to explain what they have against free speech…

2:07 PM Update: Harry Reid is on the floor of Senate saying the Republicans have refused all deals on staging a debate…”The minority…has decided to stamp out debate. America demands more than filibuster on the President’s flawed plan.”

2:14PM: Did I just hear Reid say, “According to the Republican leader, all Republicans will vote not to proceed” with the debate? That seems weird: Warner will vote against debating his own proposal?

2:20 PM–Mitch McConnell, Republican leader, has called this “a bump in the road…and aa fairness vote.” Apparently, he wants all resolutions subjected to 60 vote majority

2:25 PM–Reid: why not a simple up or down vote on each of the resolutions–Warner, McCain, Gregg (which would posit that the Senate will not cut off support for the troops).

3 pm–Apparently there will be a debate on whether or not to have a debate at 4pm, and aa vote at 5:30 pm…I’ll be back at 4 pm.

Related Topics: Uncategorized
  • Latest on Swampland

    Why Romney Is Dodging the Press

    Joe, the Romney campaign’s control-freakery makes for bad democracy, but I suspect it’s a smart strategy. Consider the way Mitt’s personal approval rating has bounced back over the past several weeks. As the GOP primaries wrapped up, Romney was roughly as unpopular as late-era George W. Bush. Now he’s about even with Barack Obama.

    Since becoming the presumptive Republican nominee, Romney’s favorable-unfavorable rating has jumped to 50%-41%, his best ever and in the same neighborhood as Obama’s 52%-46% standing.

    What changed? Well, for one thing, other Republican rivals are no longer attacking Romney. That helps. But it’s not like he’s had a free ride: the Obama camp has picked up where Rick and Newt left off. An alternate explanation would be that Americans are simply seeing less of Romney, and that makes them like him better.

    For Obama, gay marriage stance born of a long evolutionHuffPost Politics

    Crossroads, Super PACs and the Incumbent Advertising Gap

    In a recent piece about the Obama-Romney ad wars, Michael Scherer made the smart point that this election is different from past ones in that the incumbent no longer gets a free hit on his rival during the period immediately following the primary. The reason: super PACs have the cash to cover that gap while the challenger collects enough general election funds to keep pace.

blog comments powered by Disqus