At the Rally

Protesters were waterboarding someone near Charlie Palmer’s. Really. They were pretending to interrogate a guy in an orange jumpsuit, but the rest wasn’t for pretend. They poured water through a cloth held over on his face as he lay on a steep incline, his head near the ground. He was screaming.

About five or six people were taking pictures; some of the photographers were press, some appeared to be with the protest, at least one could have been a tourist.

I told the next policeman I saw: “You know, they’re waterboarding someone over there.”

He said: “What’s waterboarding?”

Me: “We’ll, they’re doing a demonstration if you want to find out. You know, when they have the guy upside down? And they pour water on his face?”

Policeman: “Oh, yeah. But if it’s voluntary — ” he shrugged ” — there’s not a law against it.”

Me: “I think that’s the point. But it looks pretty dangerous. You might just want to make sure no one gets hurt accidentally?”

Him: “Sure. Once these people get out of the way, I’ll check it out.”

I went back myself a few minutes later. The demonstration was over. The man in the jumpsuit was hanging onto a lamppost, soaking wet, retching. People were still taking pictures, but the crowd had moved on.

As I walked across the street toward home, I stood with a man and his daughter. A protester dressed like a fairy or a good witch pranced toward us. “Look honey, she has bells on!” the dad said.

“Ring a bell for peace!” trilled the fairy, who jingled as she walked. It was a less depressing note to leave on.

UPDATE: Thanks to commenter JJ, who points to an un-fire-walled version of my friend Tom’s spectacular New Republic piece on the building at 101 Capitol Ave. And to Stanley W. Rogouski, for finding pictures of the demonstration.

Related Topics: Uncategorized
  • Latest on Swampland

    Why Romney Is Dodging the Press

    Joe, the Romney campaign’s control-freakery makes for bad democracy, but I suspect it’s a smart strategy. Consider the way Mitt’s personal approval rating has bounced back over the past several weeks. As the GOP primaries wrapped up, Romney was roughly as unpopular as late-era George W. Bush. Now he’s about even with Barack Obama.

    Since becoming the presumptive Republican nominee, Romney’s favorable-unfavorable rating has jumped to 50%-41%, his best ever and in the same neighborhood as Obama’s 52%-46% standing.

    What changed? Well, for one thing, other Republican rivals are no longer attacking Romney. That helps. But it’s not like he’s had a free ride: the Obama camp has picked up where Rick and Newt left off. An alternate explanation would be that Americans are simply seeing less of Romney, and that makes them like him better.

    For Obama, gay marriage stance born of a long evolutionHuffPost Politics

    Crossroads, Super PACs and the Incumbent Advertising Gap

    In a recent piece about the Obama-Romney ad wars, Michael Scherer made the smart point that this election is different from past ones in that the incumbent no longer gets a free hit on his rival during the period immediately following the primary. The reason: super PACs have the cash to cover that gap while the challenger collects enough general election funds to keep pace.

blog comments powered by Disqus