Re: Womb Wars

By Karen Tumulty | January 12, 2007 | +

Senator Boxer’s spokeswoman suggests the comment should be viewed in fuller context, so here it is:

Now, the issue is who pays the price. Who pays the price?

I’m not going to pay a personal price. My kids are too old and
my grandchild is too young. You’re not going to pay a particular price, as I understand it,
with immediate family. So who pays the price? The American military and their families.

Here is Sen. Boxer’s statement today:

I spoke the truth at the Committee hearing, which is that neither Secretary Rice nor I have family members that will pay the price for this escalation. My point was to focus attention on our military families who continue to sacrifice because this Administration has not developed a political solution to the situation in Iraq.

Related Topics: Uncategorized

@TIMEPolitics

Latest on Swampland

Mitt Romney May 16, 2012

Why Romney Is Dodging the Press

Joe, the Romney campaign’s control-freakery makes for bad democracy, but I suspect it’s a smart strategy. Consider the way Mitt’s personal approval rating has bounced back over the past several weeks. As the GOP primaries wrapped up, Romney was roughly as unpopular as late-era George W. Bush. Now he’s about even with Barack Obama.

Since becoming the presumptive Republican nominee, Romney’s favorable-unfavorable rating has jumped to 50%-41%, his best ever and in the same neighborhood as Obama’s 52%-46% standing.

What changed? Well, for one thing, other Republican rivals are no longer attacking Romney. That helps. But it’s not like he’s had a free ride: the Obama camp has picked up where Rick and Newt left off. An alternate explanation would be that Americans are simply seeing less of Romney, and that makes them like him better.
From our Partners
For Obama, gay marriage stance born of a long evolutionHuffPost Politics

Gay Marriage, Black VotersSlate
Mitt Romney Says Homosexuality Wasn't Discussed In 1960s; History Tells A Different StoryHuffPost Politics
Ads May 16, 2012

Crossroads, Super PACs and the Incumbent Advertising Gap

In a recent piece about the Obama-Romney ad wars, Michael Scherer made the smart point that this election is different from past ones in that the incumbent no longer gets a free hit on his rival during the period immediately following the primary. The reason: super PACs have the cash to cover that gap while the challenger collects enough general election funds to keep pace.